Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
John Spencer
Clinical teaching Learning in the clinical environment
has many strengths. It is focused on real problems in the context of
professional practice. Learners are motivated by its relevance and
through active participation. Professional thinking, behaviour, and
attitudes are "modelled" by teachers. It is the only setting in
which the skills of history taking, physical examination, clinical
reasoning, decision making, empathy, and professionalism can be taught
and learnt as an integrated whole. Despite these potential strengths,
clinical teaching has been much criticised for its variability, lack of
intellectual challenge, and haphazard nature. In other words, clinical
teaching is an educationally sound approach, all too frequently
undermined by problems of implementation.
Many principles of good teaching, however, can (and should) be
incorporated into clinical teaching. One of the most important is the
need for planning. Far from compromising spontaneity, planning provides
structure and context for both teacher and students, as well as a
framework for reflection and evaluation. Preparation is recognised by
students as evidence of a good clinical teacher.
Almost all doctors are involved in clinical teaching at some
point in their careers, and most undertake the job conscientiously and enthusiastically.
However, few receive any formal training in teaching skills,
and in the past there has been an assumption that if a person simply
knows a lot about their subject, they will be able to teach it. In
reality, of course, although subject expertise is important, it is not
sufficient. Effective clinical teachers use several distinct, if
overlapping, forms of knowledge.
Understanding the learning process
will help clinical teachers to be more effective. Several theories are
relevant (see first article in the series, 25 January). All start with
the premise that learning is an active process (and, by inference, that
the teacher's role is to act as facilitator). Cognitive theories argue that learning involves processing information through interplay between
existing knowledge and new knowledge. An important influencing factor
is what the learner knows already. The quality of the resulting new
knowledge depends not only on "activating" this prior knowledge but
also on the degree of elaboration that takes place. The more elaborate
the resulting knowledge, the more easily it will be retrieved,
particularly when learning takes place in the context in which the
knowledge will be used.
Help students to identify what they already know
Help students elaborate their knowledge
Experiential learning theory holds
that learning is often most effective when based on experience. Several
models have been described, the common feature being a cyclical process
linking concrete experience with abstract conceptualisation through
reflection and planning. Reflection is standing back and thinking about
experience (What did it mean? How does it relate to previous
experience? How did I feel?). Planning involves anticipating the
application of new theories and skills (What will I do next time?). The
experiential learning cycle, which can be entered at any stage,
provides a useful framework for planning teaching
sessions.
The session
Questions may fulfil many purposes, such as to clarify
understanding, to promote curiosity, and to emphasise key points. They can be classified as "closed," "open," and "clarifying" (or
"probing") questions.
Effective
teaching depends crucially on the teacher's communication skills. Two
important areas of communication for effective teaching are questioning
and giving explanations. Both are underpinned by attentive listening
(including sensitivity to learners' verbal and non-verbal cues). It is
important to allow learners to articulate areas in which they are
having difficulties or which they wish to know more about
that is, teaching and learning focused on,
and usually directly involving, patients and their problems
lies at
the heart of medical education. At undergraduate level, medical schools
strive to give students as much clinical exposure as possible; they are
also increasingly giving students contact with patients earlier in the
course. For postgraduates, "on the job" clinical teaching is the
core of their professional development. How can a clinical teacher
optimise the teaching and learning opportunities that arise in daily
practice?

Clinical teaching in general practice
![]()
Strengths, problems, and challenges
Common problems with clinical teaching
Challenges of clinical teaching
clinical (especially when needs of
patients and students conflict); administrative; research
makes planning more difficult
![]()
The importance of planning

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Questions to ask yourself when planning a clinical teaching
session
![]()
How doctors teach

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Various domains of knowledge contribute to the idiosyncratic
teaching strategies ("teaching scripts") that tutors use in
clinical settings
![]()
How students learn
How to use cognitive learning theory in clinical teaching
for example, use of clinical examples, comparisons,
analogies
![]()
Experiential learning
Example of clinical teaching session based on experiential
learning cycle
Six third year medical
students doing introductory clinical skills course based in
general practice
History taking and physical examination
of patients with musculoskeletal problems (with specific
focus on rheumatoid arthritis); three patients with good stories and
signs recruited from the community
Brainstorm for relevant symptoms and
signs: this activates prior knowledge and orientates and
provides framework and structure for the task
Students interview patients in
pairs and do focused physical examination under supervision:
this provides opportunities to implement and practise skills
Case presentations and discussion:
feedback and discussion provides opportunities for
elaboration of knowledge
Didactic input from teacher (basic
clinical information about rheumatoid arthritis): this links
practice with theory
"What have I learned?" and
"How will I approach such a patient next time?" Such
questions prepare students for the next encounter and enable evaluation
of the session

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Experiential learning cycle: the role of the teacher is to help
students to move round, and complete, the cycle
![]()
Questions
Closed questions invoke relatively low order thinking, often simple recall. Indeed, a closed question may elicit no response at all (for example, because the learner is worried about being wrong), and the teacher may end up answering their own question.
In theory, open questions are more likely to promote deeper
thinking, but if they are too broad they may
be equally ineffective. The purpose of clarifying and probing questions
is self evident.
|
How to use questions
|
| |
Explanation |
|---|
Teaching usually involves a lot of
explanation, ranging from the (all too common) short lecture to
"thinking aloud." The latter is a powerful way of "modelling"
professional thinking, giving the novice insight into experts'
clinical reasoning and decision making (not easily articulated in a
didactic way). There are close analogies between teacher-student and
doctor-patient communication, and the principles for giving clear
explanations apply. If in doubt, pitch things at a low level and work
upwards. As the late Sydney Jacobson, a journalist, said, "Never
underestimate the person's intelligence, but don't overestimate their
knowledge." Not only does a good teacher avoid answering questions,
but he or she also questions answers.
|
Questions can be sequenced to draw out contributions or be built on to promote thinking at higher cognitive levels and to develop new understanding |
|
How to give effective explanations
|
| |
Exploiting teaching opportunities |
|---|
Most clinical teaching takes place in the context of busy practice, with time at a premium. Many studies have shown that a disproportionate amount of time in teaching sessions may be spent on regurgitation of facts, with relatively little on checking, probing, and developing understanding. Models for using time more effectively and efficiently and integrating teaching into day to day routines have been described. One such, the "one-minute preceptor," comprises a series of steps, each of which involves an easily performed task, which when combined form an integrated teaching strategy.
|
| |
Teaching on the wards |
|---|
Despite a long and worthy tradition, the hospital ward is not an ideal teaching venue. None the less, with preparation and forethought, learning opportunities can be maximised with minimal disruption to staff, patients, and their relatives.
Approaches include teaching on ward rounds (either dedicated
teaching rounds or during "business" rounds); students seeing patients on their own (or in pairs
students can learn a lot from each
other) then reporting back, with or without a follow up visit to the
bedside for further discussion; and shadowing, when learning will
inevitably be more opportunistic.
Key issues are careful selection of patients; ensuring ward
staff know what's happening; briefing patients as well as students; using a side room (rather than the bedside) for discussions about patients; and ensuring that all relevant information (such as records
and x ray films) is available.
| |
Teaching in the clinic |
|---|
Although teaching during
consultations is organisationally appealing and minimally disruptive,
it is limited in what it can achieve if students remain passive
observers.
|
Teaching during consultations has been much criticised for not actively involving learners |
With relatively little impact on the running of a clinic,
students can participate more actively. For example, they can
beasked to make specific observations, write down thoughts
about differential diagnosis or further tests, or note any
questions
for discussion between patients. A more active approach is
"hot seating." Here, the student leads the consultation, or part of
it. His or her findings can be checked with the patient, and discussion
and feedback can take place during or after the encounter. Students,
although daunted, find this rewarding. A third model is when a student sees a patient alone in a separate room, and is then joined by the
tutor. The student then presents their findings, and discussion follows. A limitation is that the teacher does not see the student in
action. It also inevitably slows the clinic down, although not as much
as might be expected. In an ideal world it would always be sensible to
block out time in a clinic to accommodate teaching.
| |
The patient's role |
|---|
Sir William Osler's dictum that
"it is a safe rule to have no teaching without a patient for a text,
and the best teaching is that taught by the patient himself" is well
known. The importance of learning from the patient has been repeatedly
emphasised. For example, generations of students have been exhorted to
"listen to the patient
he is telling you the diagnosis."
Traditionally, however, a patient's role has been essentially passive,
the patient acting as interesting teaching material, often no more than
a medium through which the teacher teaches. As well as being
potentially disrespectful, this is a wasted opportunity. Not only can
patients tell their stories and show physical signs, but they can also give deeper and broader insights into their problems. Finally, they can
give feedback to both learners and teacher. Through their interactions
with patients, clinical teachers
knowingly or unknowingly
have a
powerful influence on learners as role models.
|
|
Working effectively and ethically with patients
|
|
Suggested reading
|
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Drs Gabrielle Greveson and Gail Young gave helpful feedback on early drafts.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
John Spencer is a general practitioner and professor of medical education in primary health care at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
The ABC of learning and teaching in medicine is edited by Peter Cantillon, senior lecturer in medical informatics and medical education, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland; Linda Hutchinson, director of education and workforce development and consultant paediatrician, University Hospital Lewisham; and Diana F Wood, deputy dean for education and consultant endocrinologist, Barts and the London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London. The series will be published as a book in late spring.
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.