Table 1.  Pooled likelihood ratios (95% confidence intervals; random effects) of negative result with Ottawa ankle rules for subgroups of increasing complexity of methodological quality


Stratum
Prospective data collection
Plus consecutive enrolment
Plus blinding
Plus radiography as reference standard in all patients
All studies
Within 48 hours
After 48 hours
Within 48 hours
After 48 hours
Within 48 hours
After 48 hours
Within 48 hours
After 48 hours
Ankle 0.01 (0.08 to 0.22) 0.09* (0.04 to 0.22) --- 0.08 (0.02 to 0.39) --- 0.07 (0.01 to 0.44) --- --- 0.08 (0.03 to 0.20)
  2×2 tables n=1 n=12 n=5 n=4 n=13
Mid-foot --- 0.07* (0.03 to 0.21) --- 0.08 (0.01 to 0.77) --- 0.08  (0.003 to 1.74) --- --- 0.07 (0.03 to 0.21)
  2×2 tables n=9 n=4 n=3 n=9
Combined --- 0.21* (0.12 to 0.38) --- 0.26 (0.13 to 0.51) --- 0.29 (0.12 to 0.71) --- 0.42 (0.21 to 0.81) 0.21 (0.12 to 0.38)
  2×2 tables n=10 n=6 n=4 n=1 n=10
Children 0.08 (0.02 to 0.29) 0.06  (0.02 to 0.25) 0.10 (0.01 to 1.64) --- 0.10 (0.01 to 1.64) --- --- --- 0.07 (0.03 to 0.18)
  2×2 tables n=4 n=3 n=1 n=1 n=7 

* Larger negative likelihood ratios in studies testing Ottawa ankle rules in mixed populations (ankle and mid-foot versus combined: P<0.001).




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ