Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Diana F Wood
Problem based learning is used in many medical schools
in the United Kingdom and worldwide. This article describes this method of learning and teaching in small groups and explains why it has had an
important impact on medical education.
In problem based learning (PBL) students use "triggers"
from the problem case or scenario to define their own learning
objectives. Subsequently they do independent, self directed study
before returning to the group to discuss and refine their acquired
knowledge. Thus, PBL is not about problem solving per se, but rather it
uses appropriate problems to increase knowledge and understanding. The
process is clearly defined, and the several variations that exist all follow a similar series of steps.

The group learning process: acquiring desirable learning
skills
![]()
What is problem based learning?
Top
What is problem based...
What happens in a...
PBL in curriculum design
Writing PBL scenarios
Staff development
Assessment of PBL
Conclusion
Generic skills and attitudes
Teamwork
Critical evaluation of literature
Chairing a group
Self directed learning and use of resources
Listening
Presentation skills
Recording
Cooperation
Respect for colleagues' views
Group learning facilitates not only the acquisition of knowledge but also several other desirable attributes, such as communication skills, teamwork, problem solving, independent responsibility for learning, sharing information, and respect for others. PBL can therefore be thought of as a small group teaching method that combines the acquisition of knowledge with the development of generic skills and attitudes. Presentation of clinical material as the stimulus for learning enables students to understand the relevance of underlying scientific knowledge and principles in clinical practice.
However, when PBL is introduced into a curriculum, several other issues for curriculum design and implementation need to be tackled. PBL is generally introduced in the context of a defined core curriculum and integration of basic and clinical sciences. It has implications for staffing and learning resources and demands a different approach to timetabling, workload, and assessment. PBL is often used to deliver core material in non-clinical parts of the curriculum. Paper based PBL scenarios form the basis of the core curriculum and ensure that all students are exposed to the same problems. Recently, modified PBL techniques have been introduced into clinical education, with "real" patients being used as the stimulus for learning. Despite the essential ad hoc nature of learning clinical medicine, a "key cases" approach can enable PBL to be used to deliver the core clinical curriculum.
|
| |
What happens in a PBL tutorial? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PBL tutorials are conducted in several ways. In this article, the examples are modelled on the Maastricht "seven jump" process, but its format of seven steps may be shortened.
A typical PBL tutorial consists of a group of students (usually eight to 10) and a tutor, who facilitates the session. The length of time (number of sessions) that a group stays together with each other and with individual tutors varies between institutions. A group needs to be together long enough to allow good group dynamics to develop but may need to be changed occasionally if personality clashes or other dysfunctional behaviour emerges.
Students elect a chair for each PBL scenario and a
"scribe" to record the discussion. The roles are rotated for each
scenario. Suitable flip charts or a whiteboard should be used for
recording the proceedings. At the start of the
session, depending on the trigger material, either the student chair
reads out the scenario or all students study the material. If the
trigger is a real patient in a ward, clinic, or surgery then a student
may be asked to take a clinical history or identify an abnormal
physical sign before the group moves to a tutorial room. For each
module, students may be given a handbook containing the problem
scenarios, and suggested learning resources or learning materials may
be handed out at appropriate times as the tutorials progress.
|
Examples of trigger material for PBL scenarios
|
|
PBL tutorial process
|
The role of the tutor is to facilitate the proceedings
(helping the chair to maintain group dynamics and moving the group through the task) and to ensure that the group achieves appropriate learning objectives in line with those set by the curriculum design team. The tutor may need to take a more active role in step 7 of the
process to ensure that all the students have done the appropriate work
and to help the chair to suggest a suitable format for group members to
use to present the results of their private study. The tutor should
encourage students to check their understanding of the material. He or
she can do this by encouraging the students to ask open questions and
ask each other to explain topics in their own words or by the use of
drawings and diagrams.
| |
PBL in curriculum design |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PBL may be used either as the mainstay of an entire curriculum or for the delivery of individual courses. In practice, PBL is usually part of an integrated curriculum using a systems based approach, with non-clinical material delivered in the context of clinical practice. A module or short course can be designed to include mixed teaching methods (including PBL) to achieve the learning outcomes in knowledge, skills, and attitudes. A small number of lectures may be desirable to introduce topics or provide an overview of difficult subject material in conjunction with the PBL scenarios. Sufficient time should be allowed each week for students to do the self directed learning required for PBL.
|
| |
Writing PBL scenarios |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PBL is successful only if the scenarios are of high quality. In
most undergraduate PBL curriculums the faculty identifies learning
objectives in advance. The scenario should lead students to a
particular area of study to achieve those learning
objectives.
|
How to create effective PBL scenarios*
*Adapted from Dolmans et al. Med Teacher
1997;19:185-9 |
| |
Staff development |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Introducing PBL into a course makes new demands on tutors, requiring them to function as facilitators for small group learning rather than acting as providers of information. Staff development is essential and should focus on enabling the PBL tutors to acquire skills in facilitation and in management of group dynamics (including dysfunctional groups).
|
Tutors should be also given information about the
institution's educational strategy and curriculum programme so that
they can help students to understand the learning objectives of
individual modules in the context of the curriculum as a whole. Methods
of assessment and evaluation should be described, and time should be
available to discuss anxieties.
|
Advantages and disadvantages of PBL
|
Staff may feel uncertain about facilitating a PBL tutorial for
a subject in which they do not themselves specialise. Subject specialists may, however, be poor PBL facilitators as they are more
likely to interrupt the process and revert to lecturing. None the less,
students value expertise, and the best tutors are subject specialists
who understand the curriculum and have excellent facilitation skills.
However, enthusiastic non-specialist tutors who are trained in
facilitation, know the curriculum, and have adequate tutor notes, are
good PBL tutors.
| |
Assessment of PBL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Student learning is influenced greatly by the assessment
methods used. If assessment methods rely solely on factual recall then
PBL is unlikely to succeed in the curriculum. All assessment schedules
should follow the basic principles of testing the student in relation
to the curriculum outcomes and should use an appropriate range of
assessment methods.
|
Further reading
|
Assessment of students' activities in their PBL groups is
advisable. Tutors should give feedback or use formative or summative assessment procedures as dictated by the faculty assessment schedule. It is also helpful to consider assessment of the group as a whole. The
group should be encouraged to reflect on its PBL performance including
its adherence to the process, communication skills, respect for others,
and individual contributions. Peer pressure in the group reduces the
likelihood of students failing to keep up with workload, and the award
of a group mark
added to each individual's assessment schedule
encourages students to achieve the generic goals associated with PBL.
| |
Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PBL is an effective way of delivering medical education in a coherent, integrated programme and offers several advantages over traditional teaching methods. It is based on principles of adult learning theory, including motivating the students, encouraging them to set their own learning goals, and giving them a role in decisions that affect their own learning.
Predictably, however, PBL does not offer a universal panacea
for teaching and learning in medicine, and it has several well recognised disadvantages. Traditional knowledge based assessments of
curriculum outcomes have shown little or no difference in students graduating from PBL or traditional curriculums. Importantly, though, students from PBL curriculums seem to have better knowledge retention. PBL also generates a more stimulating and challenging educational environment, and the beneficial effects from the generic attributes acquired through PBL should not be underestimated.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Christ and St John with Angels by Peter Paul Rubens is from the collection of the Earl of Pembroke/BAL.The Mad Hatter's Tea Party is by John Tenniel.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
The ABC of learning and teaching in medicine is edited by Peter Cantillon, senior lecturer in medical informatics and medical education, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland; Linda Hutchinson, director of education and workforce development and consultant paediatrician, University Hospital Lewisham; and Diana F Wood, deputy dean for education and consultant endocrinologist, Barts and the London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London. The series will be published as a book in late spring.
Read all Rapid Responses