Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Maeve A Eogan National Maternity Hospital, Holles
St, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland Correspondence to: M A Eogan maeveeogan{at}eircom.net
The association of fetal sex with pregnancy induced
hypertension and pre-eclampsia, the interaction between sex and risk
factors for fetal growth restriction, and the increased likelihood of second stage arrest with male sex have all been
studied.1-3 However, a Medline search (1966 to August
2002) using the search terms fetal gender, fetal sex, labour, delivery,
and childbirth found no studies on the effect of fetal sex itself on
labour outcomes and events. We set out to determine the effect of fetal
sex on birth weight, duration of labour, mode of delivery, and birth outcome.
In the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, where the study took
place, labour and delivery are actively managed according to a standard
protocol.4 We obtained data from the delivery ward
database for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2000 on all
primigravid mothers who had a singleton, cephalic fetus and who
spontaneously went into labour at term. We confined the analysis to
this group to avoid the confounding effects of induced labour and
previous parity. We excluded stillbirths, neonatal deaths, and infants
with congenital anomalies. We used a In the study period 4070 male and 4005 female infants fulfilled
the inclusion criteria. Male infants were significantly more likely to
require oxytocin augmentation, fetal blood sampling, and instrumental
vaginal delivery or caesarean section (table). Female infants were more
likely to have meconium stained liquor. There was no statistically
significant difference between the sexes in gestation, requirement for
antibiotics in labour, or the number of infants with no liquor in
labour.
![]()
Subjects, methods, and results
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comment
References
2 test with
Yates's correction (P values were considered significant at the level
of <0.01). Among the variables studied were gestation, need for
antibiotics, need for oxytocin augmentation, colour of liquor, need for
fetal blood sampling, use of epidural analgesia, duration of labour,
and mode of delivery, as well as birth weight.
Multiple regression analysis, with adjustment for confounding factors
that are known to affect labour and delivery outcome (such as birth
weight, duration of labour, and use of epidural analgesia), showed a
strong association between fetal sex and birth weight, duration of
labour, and mode of delivery. However, mode of delivery was not
associated with birth weight.
| |
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primigravid women who go into labour spontaneously and at term are more likely to encounter complications during labour and delivery when the infant is a boy. We found no biases in the data studied that could account for the difference; specifically, demographic details of the mothers were similar. Furthermore, the possible confounding effects of parity and induction of labour were removed by confining this analysis to spontaneously labouring primigravid women.
The reason for the impact of fetal sex on birth outcome is unclear.
Male infants have a significantly larger head size than female infants,
and this may contribute to the duration of labour and the higher
incidence of operative delivery.5 Although we adjusted for
birth weight of the infants, we did not consider data on head
circumference. However, this factor would not fully explain the sex
difference, as duration of labour alone would not account for the
increased incidence of suspected fetal distress in males (as evidenced
by their increased need for fetal blood sampling). What this study does
show is that when we say "it must be a boy" as a humorous
explanation of complications of labour and delivery we are
scientifically more correct than previously supposed.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: MAE had the original idea for the study. MAE, DPK, and MPO'C designed the study. MAE, MPO'C, and MPG managed the data collection and entry. MPO'C and MPG analysed the data. All authors contributed to interpretation of results and to the writing of the paper. MAE will act as guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Makhseed M, Musini VM, Ahmed MA. Association of fetal gender with pregnancy induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998; 63: 55-56[Medline]. |
| 2. | Spinillo A, Capuzzo E, Nicola S, Colonna L, Iasci A, Zara C. Interaction between fetal gender and risk factors for fetal growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 1273-1277[Medline]. |
| 3. | Feinstein U, Sheiner E, Levy A, Hallak M, Mazor M. Risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labour. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 77: 7-14[Medline]. |
| 4. | O'Driscoll K, Meagher D, Boylan P. Active management of labour. In: London: Mosby, 1993. |
| 5. | Hindmarsh PC, Geary MP, Rodeck CH, Kingdom JC, Cole TJ. Intrauterine growth and its relationship to size and shape at birth. Pediatr Res 2002; 52: 263-268[CrossRef][Medline]. |
(Accepted 4 October 2002)
Read all Rapid Responses