Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Researchers, policy makers, and media personnel need to collaborate on guidelines
Reporting and portrayal of suicidal behaviour in the
media may have potentially negative influences and facilitate suicidal acts by people exposed to such stimuli. Recent systematic reviews by
others and ourselves (unpublished) have found overwhelming evidence for
such effects.1 Evidence for the influence of media on
suicidal behaviour has been shown for newspaper and television reports
of actual suicides, film and television portrayals of suicides, and
suicide in literature, especially suicide manuals. The potential for
"suicide sites" on the internet influencing suicidal behaviour
remains to be proved, but anecdotal evidence of negative influences is
accumulating.
2 3
The impact of the media on suicidal behaviour seems to be most likely
when a method of suicide is specified Tackling this problem is one component of preventing suicides, and it
is included in the recently published National Suicide Prevention
Strategy for England.8 Relevant questions are,
therefore, how this should be done and whether it can be effective. One
approach has been to produce guidelines for the media, of which there
are now several.
9 10
All these emphasise the need to
avoid dramatic reporting or portrayal of suicide and specifying means
used. Most highlight the desirability of providing accurate facts about
causes, including due emphasis on mental health problems. At present no clear policy exists for the problem of "suicide sites" on
the internet.
One potential drawback of guidelines is that, in isolation, they may be
seen as dictating what the media can or cannot do and as threatening
freedom of speech. Firstly, for them to have credibility with
authorities in the media and with journalists they must be based on
evidence. Secondly, they should be produced ideally as a collaboration
between researchers, public health policy makers, and senior media
personnel. Thirdly, which is perhaps most difficult, they should be
shown to work. Some limited evidence exists of this. In an initiative
in Switzerland it was shown that collaboration between researchers and
the media resulted in a reduction of sensational and lengthy reports of
suicides in newspapers.11 No attempt was made, however, to
measure the impact on suicide. Efforts to limit the reporting of subway
suicides in Vienna through the collaboration of researchers and
journalists were followed by a reduction in the number of suicides and
suicide attempts by this method.12
A further but unanswered question is whether media portrayal of
positive coping with adversity in circumstances that might have led to
suicidal acts could provide a model that might also reduce suicidal
behaviour. Steps in this direction are worth exploring but will also
need collaborative initiatives. Their evaluation will present a
considerable but surmountable challenge.
Possibly the most influential approach to the problem of media and
suicide will be through ensuring that training courses for careers in
the media pay adequate attention to this important topic. Similar
initiatives should be made available to those already established in
media careers. Finally, inappropriate media portrayal and reporting of
suicidal behaviour should be immediately highlighted. This should
encourage producers and editors to remain aware of their potentially
influential role in future suicides.
Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of
Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX
especially when presented in
detail
when the story is reported or portrayed dramatically and
prominently
for example with photographs of the deceased or large
headlines
and when suicides of celebrities are
reported.4-6 Younger people seem to be most vulnerable to
the influence of the media, although limited evidence also shows an
impact on elderly people. Another factor is similarity between the
media stimulus or model and the observer in terms of age, sex, and
nationality. An important aspect of the presentation of suicide in the
media is that it usually oversimplifies the causes, attributing the act
to single factors such as financial disasters, broken relationships, or
failure in examinations. The most common factor leading to suicide,
mental illness, is often overlooked.7
Kathryn Williams
Footnotes
Competing interests: The authors have received funding for research from Syngenta.
| 1. | Pirkis J, Blood RW. Suicide and the media: a critical review. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, 2001. |
| 2. | Baume P, Cantor CH, Rolfe A. Cybersuicide: the role of interactive suicide notes on the internet. Crisis 1997; 18: 73-79[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Alao AO, Yolles JC, Armenta W.
Cybersuicide: the internet and suicide.
Am J Psychiatry
1999;
156:
1836-1837 |
| 4. | Phillips DP. The influence of suggestion on suicide: substantive and theoretical implications of the Werther effect. Am Sociol Rev 1974; 39: 340-354[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Hawton K, Simkin S, Deeks JJ, O'Connor S, Keen A, Altman DG, et al.
Effects of a drug overdose in a television drama on presentations to hospital for self poisoning: time series and questionnaire study.
BMJ
1999;
318:
972-977 |
| 6. | Stack S. Celebrities and suicide: a taxonomy and analysis. Am Sociol Rev 1987; 52: 401-412[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 7. | Fishman G, Weimann G. Motives to commit suicide: statistical versus mass-mediated reality. Arch Suicide Res 1997; 3: 199-212. |
| 8. | Department of Health. National suicide prevention strategy for England. London: Department of Health, 2002. |
| 9. | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Mental Health, Office of the Surgeon General. Reporting on suicide: recommendations for the media. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2002; 32: vii-xiii. www.afsp.org/education/recommendations/index.html (accessed 24 Oct 2002). |
| 10. | Samaritans. Media guidelines. Portrayals of suicide. Ewell: Samaritans, 2002. www.Samaritans.org/know/media_guide.shtm (accessed 24 Oct 2002). |
| 11. | Michel K, Frey C, Wyss K, Valach L. An exercise in improving suicide reporting in print media. Crisis 2000; 21: 1-10. |
| 12. | Etzersdorfer E, Sonneck G. Preventing suicide by influencing mass-media reporting. The Viennese experience 1980-1996. Arch Suicide Res 1998; 4: 67-74. |
Read all Rapid Responses