BMJ 2002;325:1134 ( 16 November )

News

MMR vaccine is not linked with autism, says Danish study

Janice Hopkins Tanne, New York

A Danish study of more than half a million children showed no link between measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination and autism.

In a commentary accompanying the study, which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2002;347:1477-82)[Abstract/Free Full Text], Dr Edward Campion, senior deputy editor, wrote, "This careful and convincing study shows that there is no association between autism and MMR vaccination."

Lead author Dr Kreesten Meldgaard Madsen, an epidemiologist and expert on infectious diseases at the Danish Epidemiology Science Centre in Aarhus, told the BMJ that the study showed that the risk of autism was similar in children who were vaccinated and children who were not.

The study reviewed records of 537303 children born in Denmark between January 1991 and December 1998, representing almost 100% of children born in that period. Of these children 440655 had been vaccinated. Records were retrieved from three sources: the unique identification number assigned to each child at birth; MMR vaccination data reported to the National Board of Health by general practitioners, who give all MMR vaccinations and are reimbursed for their reports; and diagnoses of autism recorded in the Danish Psychiatric Central Registry. Only specialists in child psychiatry diagnose autism and related conditions.

The study considered the children's sex, weight and gestational age at birth, and age at diagnosis of autism or of a related disorder; the socioeconomic status of the parents; and the mother's education.

The authors found that "There was no increase in the risk of autistic disorder or other autistic-spectrum disorders among vaccinated children as compared with unvaccinated children (adjusted relative risk of autistic disorder, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.24; adjusted relative risk of other autistic-spectrum disorders, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.07)."

In addition, the authors found no association between the development of autistic disorder and the age at vaccination, the interval since vaccination, or the calendar period at the time of vaccination.

Children were vaccinated at 15 to 17 months, and catch up vaccination was given to older children when the vaccine was introduced in 1987. Almost all children were vaccinated before the age of 3 years. The mean age at diagnosis for autism was 4 years, 3 months, and for autistic spectrum disorders 5 years, 3 months.

Although MMR vaccination was introduced in Denmark in 1987, the rise in autism began only in the mid-1990s. "If it [MMR vaccination] caused autism, we would see a greater risk [soon] after its introduction," Dr Madsen said, but the study did not show that. Autism is increasing, perhaps because of better diagnosis, but there is no link to MMR vaccination, he said.

The retrospective nature of the study may be its strength, Dr Madsen told the BMJ. Recall bias, such as when parents whose children are given a diagnosis of autism recall events that occurred around the time of the diagnosis, was absent. In this study, data on vaccination were recorded separately from data on diagnosis.

MMR vaccination protects children against disease, Dr Madsen said. "Measles kills one in 3000 children, even in developed countries. It causes encephalitis in one in 2000 and pneumonia in one in 20. People tend to forget."


© BMJ 2002

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

MMR Vaccine Proven to Not Cause Autism, Again...
Tony Floyd
bmj.com, 16 Nov 2002 [Full text]
Yes: we do need confirmation
Neville W Goodman
bmj.com, 20 Nov 2002 [Full text]
Confirmation of what?
Tony Floyd
bmj.com, 27 Nov 2002 [Full text]
Which MMR?
John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 10 Dec 2002 [Full text]
Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
Tony Floyd
bmj.com, 23 Feb 2003 [Full text]
Criticisms of Madsen et al in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
John Stone
bmj.com, 7 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: Criticisms of Madsen et al in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
John Stone
bmj.com, 8 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: Criticisms of Madsen et al in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Dr John MM Rumbold
bmj.com, 8 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Criticism Pulled From the Air Are Not Helpful!
Paul Shapiro
bmj.com, 9 Sep 2004 [Full text]
An Apology Is In Order!
Paul Shapiro
bmj.com, 9 Sep 2004 [Full text]
THE INTERESTING QUESTION - AND OUR CHILDREN ARE NOT SAFE
John Stone
bmj.com, 10 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: THE INTERESTING QUESTION - AND OUR CHILDREN ARE NOT SAFE
John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 27 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 27 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
Peter Flegg
bmj.com, 27 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 28 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
Peter Flegg
bmj.com, 28 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Refutation of Madsen in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Dr M L Grove
bmj.com, 30 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: Refutation of Madsen in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
John Stone
bmj.com, 30 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: Refutation of Madsen in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Andrew L. Schlafly
bmj.com, 30 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Re: Refutation of Madsen in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 1 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Refutation of Madsen in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Mark Struthers
bmj.com, 1 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Refutation of Madsen in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Jane M. Orient, et al.
bmj.com, 1 Oct 2004 [Full text]
So what else happened in Denmark?
F. Edward Yazbak
bmj.com, 1 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Matthew L Grove
bmj.com, 1 Oct 2004 [Full text]
HAVE VICARS-GENERAL OF VACCINATION GOT THE NEEDLE?
Clifford G. Miller
bmj.com, 2 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: HAVE VICARS-GENERAL OF VACCINATION GOT THE NEEDLE?
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Jane M. Orient, et al.
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Endorsement for mmrthefacts advice
John Stone
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Superficial and Misleading Critique
Harold E Buttram, MD
bmj.com, 4 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: HAVE VICARS-GENERAL OF VACCINATION GOT THE NEEDLE?
Clifford G. Miller
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
Peter Flegg
bmj.com, 4 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: : Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
Carol Johnston
bmj.com, 4 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: : Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
Tony Floyd, et al.
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Superficial and Misleading Critique
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Advancing ?
Lisa C Blakemore-Brown
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Response to Carol Johnston.
Peter Flegg
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Endorsement for mmrthefacts advice
John Stone
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: : Autism. Time to Look for Real Solutions.
MC Feliciello
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
NOW WE ARE TALKING REAL NUMBERS
Clifford G. Miller
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Endorsement for mmrthefacts advice
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: HAVE VICARS-GENERAL OF VACCINATION GOT THE NEEDLE?
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Endorsement for mmrthefacts advice
John Stone
bmj.com, 6 Oct 2004 [Full text]
MMR CAUSES AUTISM - CASE PROVEN - NOW ON RISK/BENEFIT
Clifford G. Miller
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: NOW WE ARE TALKING REAL NUMBERS
Peter Flegg
bmj.com, 6 Oct 2004 [Full text]
MMMRTHEFACTS: THE POLICY FLIES WITHOUT SAFETY CHECKS AND NO ONE SAYS ANYTHING
John Stone
bmj.com, 8 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: MMMRTHEFACTS: THE POLICY FLIES
Graeme Johnston
bmj.com, 8 Oct 2004 [Full text]
RE: MMR the facts ?
Matthew Grove
bmj.com, 8 Oct 2004 [Full text]
RE: MMR the facts - addendum
Matthew L Grove
bmj.com, 8 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: RE: MMR the facts ?
L. Travis Haws
bmj.com, 8 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: RE: MMR the facts - addendum
Carol Johnston
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Graeme Johnston's reply
John Stone
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re:Superficial and Misleading Critique
Raymond Gallup
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2004 [Full text]
The demise of common sense, and logical immunity
Hilary Butler
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: MMR information in PDR
Graeme Johnston
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Advice from MMR the Facts
Carol Johnston
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Advice from MMR the Facts
Ed Cooper
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Advice from MMR the Facts (Ed Cooper's response to Carol Jonston)
John Stone
bmj.com, 11 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Advice from MMR the Facts
Carol Johnston
bmj.com, 11 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: MMR CAUSES AUTISM - CASE PROVEN - NOW ON RISK/BENEFIT
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 11 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: MMR CAUSES AUTISM - CASE PROVEN - NOW ON RISK/BENEFIT
Raymond Gallup
bmj.com, 11 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: MMR information in PDR
L. Travis Haws
bmj.com, 11 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Limits of epidemiological studies
Deborah Kahn
bmj.com, 11 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Limits of epidemiological studies
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 12 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re:Superficial and Misleading Critique
Lisa C Blakemore-Brown
bmj.com, 12 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Adam Jacobs: "Limits of epidemiological studies", or here we go round the mulberry bush
John Stone
bmj.com, 13 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Limits of epidemiological studies
John Stone
bmj.com, 13 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Adam Jacobs :Limits of epidemiological studies - here we go round the mulberry bush II
John Stone
bmj.com, 13 Oct 2004 [Full text]
MMRTHEFACTS: THE POLICY CONTINUES TO FLY WITHOUT SAFETY CHECKS
John Stone
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Adam Jacobs: "Limits of epidemiological studies", or here we go round the mulberry bush
eamonn clarke
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Adam Jacobs: "Limits of epidemiological studies", or here we go round the mulberry bush
John Stone
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Limits of epidemiological studies in autism without clinical tests
Ellen C G Grant
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Limits of epidemiological studies
Raymond Gallup
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Limits of epidemiological studies
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Constructive debate
Dr John MM Rumbold
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Limits of epidemiological studies
Raymond Gallup
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Limits of epidemiological studies
John P. Heptonstall
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Limits of epidemiological studies
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Limits of epidemiological studies
L. Travis Haws
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Adam Jacobs: "association and causation"
John Stone
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Hypothetical MMR Survey
Michael D Innis
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2004 [Full text]
"I have a dream ....."
E J Northey
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Limits of epidemiological studies
John P. Heptonstall
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Just a thought.
Hilary Butler
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Hypothetical MMR Survey
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Hypothetical MMR Survey
John Stone
bmj.com, 20 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Just a thought.
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 20 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Hypothetical MMR Survey
John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 20 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Just a thought.
John Stone
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: The Smeeth Report
Michael D Innis
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Just a bigger thought.
Hilary Butler
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Hypothetical MMR Survey
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Hypothetical MMR Survey
Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
I AM NOT AN ANTI-VACCINATIONIST - PLEASE RETRACT
John Stone
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: "I have a dream ....."
MC Feliciello
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Just a thought.
John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: The Smeeth Report
L. Travis Haws
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: The Smeeth Report
Nicholas Bennett
bmj.com, 22 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hypothetical MMR Survey
John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 22 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Objective Correlative?
Dr. Herbert H. Nehrlich
bmj.com, 22 Oct 2004 [Full text]
The most troubling thing about the Smeeth study
John Stone
bmj.com, 25 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Refutation of Madsen in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Adam Jacobs, et al.
bmj.com, 29 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Re: MMR the facts: the policy continues to fly without safety checks
John Stone
bmj.com, 12 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Refutation of Madsen in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
John Stone
bmj.com, 31 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Re: Response to Carol Johnston.
C Johnson
bmj.com, 3 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Refutation of Madsen in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons and Adam Jacobs's interests
John Stone
bmj.com, 5 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Where are the named authors of the beleaguered Madsen and Smeeth papers?
John Stone
bmj.com, 7 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Where are the named authors of the beleaguered Madsen and Smeeth papers?
John F McCleary, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Madsen, Come Out, Come Out from Where Ever You Are!
Paul Shapiro
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Where are the named authors of the beleaguered Madsen and Smeeth papers?
Michael D Innis
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2005 [Full text]
So Unusual
F. Edward Yazbak
bmj.com, 11 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: So Unusual
John Stone
bmj.com, 17 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Re: Where are the named authors of the beleaguered Madsen and Smeeth papers?
Alan D Rees
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: So Unusual - but where is the explanation?
John Stone
bmj.com, 27 Jan 2005 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview