Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
The authors of this primary care paper, Tom Marshall and Andrew Rouse,
have alerted us to some errors in the costings given for the follow up
of patients (27 July, pp 197-9). They have confirmed that despite this
the conclusions of the article remain the same.
Firstly, in table 2 in the web version (bmj.com), the
costs should read, downwards: £3567; £18 290; £32 628; £3567;
£6758; £24 489; £36 233; £14 983; £25 975; £46 270; and
£34 950. The heading for that column should read: "Cost per event prevented."
Secondly, the first three paragraphs of the results
section should read as below.
Technical efficiency: maximising benefits within total resources
For any given allocation of resources to primary prevention of
cardiovascular disease more cardiovascular events can be prevented under RM strategies than the equivalent JBR strategies. A primary care
team can prevent 5.7 events for £40 934 under strategy RM-2 or 5.7 events for £28 090 under RM-3. The most efficient strategy for a
primary care team with a budget of £40 934 is therefore RM-3. A
primary care team can prevent 7.6 events for £116 233 under strategy
RM-1 or 7.6 events for £86 696 under RM-2. The most efficient
strategy for a primary care team with a budget of £116 233 is
therefore RM-2. For a primary care team with a budget of over
£116 233 the most efficient strategy is RM-1.
Maximising efficiency within available clinical staff time
[After second sentence] At one clinic a month there is not
sufficient clinical time to assess all eligible adults. JBR strategies therefore cannot be implemented. Strategy RM-3 can prevent 4.0 cardiovascular events at a cost of £3567 per event prevented. RM-2 can
prevent 1.1 more events at an incremental cost of £18 290 per event
prevented. RM-1 can prevent 2.5 more events than RM-2 at an incremental
cost of £32 628 per event prevented.
Compared with one clinic a month, allocating two
clinics a month to RM-3 can prevent 1.6 more events at a cost of
£6758 per event prevented. Allocating two clinics a month to RM-2
prevents a further 1.7 events at an incremental cost of £24 489 per
event prevented. Two clinics a month following strategy RM-1 prevents a
further 3.5 cardiovascular events at an incremental cost of £36 233 per event prevented.