Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Elisabeth Paice London Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education,
University of London, London WC1N 1DZ Correspondence
to: E Paice epaice{at}londondeanery.ac.uk
The use of teaching staff as role models for professional
behaviour has long been an informal part of medical training. The authors consider whether role models can still be an effective means of
imparting professional values, attitudes, and behaviours in a health
service that is increasingly sensitive to society's expectations
Role models
The attributes of medical role models have been the subject of
several interesting studies. Wright and colleagues looked at physicians
who had been identified as excellent role models by students and
residents.3-5 They found that the most important qualities in role models were a positive attitude to junior colleagues, compassion for patients, and integrity. Clinical competence, enthusiasm for their subject, and teaching ability were also important, but research achievement and academic status were much less so. Compared with colleagues, physicians who were identified as excellent role models spent more time teaching and conducting rounds and were more
likely to stress the importance of the doctor-patient relationship and
psychosocial aspects of medicine. They also socialised more with house
staff, sharing professional experiences and talking about their
personal lives.
A survey of general practitioners and their students identified a
positive attitude to teaching and excellent doctor-patient relationships as important in role models.6 Using a
different approach, other researchers asked medical students to name
one or two role models among their teachers and list five
characteristics that described the role models.7 The
commonly recurring characteristics were grouped under the headings
"physician," "teacher," and "person." The role models
themselves were then asked which of these characteristics they had. The
most commonly identified characteristics were, as physicians,
enthusiasm for the their specialty, clinical reasoning skills,
doctor-patient relationships, and viewing the patient as a whole; as
teachers, enthusiasm for teaching, involving students, and
communicating effectively with students; and as people, enthusiasm, compassion, and competence. Attributes that did not feature highly on
any list were excellence of research, publications, success in raising
grants, senior management roles, service development, and professional
leadership. Nor did power, status, and high earnings feature highly.
The work of Simon Sinclair, a psychiatrist and anthropologist who
spent a year observing a group of medical students, gives contrasting
findings to these studies.8 He saw that the students were
drawn to and emulated senior doctors who had responsibility and status.
The students were not impressed by doctors who seemed to share their
power and responsibility with other professionals. He also observed the
students learning an aversion to investigating patients' social and
psychological problems. Their personal idealism waned as they became
distanced from their family and non-medical friends and adopted the
idealism of the profession. They had little awareness of the internal
conflicts that must have been associated with these changes. These
observations suggest a divergence between the qualities that students
and young doctors say they seek in their role models and the qualities
that they actually emulate. The most sought after careers are not
necessarily those most associated with a holistic, patient centred
approach.9
By no means all doctors with teaching responsibilities have the
attributes that students and young doctors say they seek in role
models. Over half the students in a Canadian medical school considered
their teachers to be insensitive to the anxieties of students and
patients and their needs for communication.10 A study of
clinical teachers found that the teachers' negative attitudes towards
the doctor-patient relationship were obstacles to their teaching about
the relationship. The teachers were hard pressed to think of occasions
when they modelled the doctor-patient relationship for their students,
and they expected more of the students than of themselves in this
regard.11 When graduates from a US medical school were
invited to write a brief essay on their time in internal medicine, they
showed such a high level of dissatisfaction with the teaching staff
that the researchers were taken aback.12
Consultants as good role models "Dealing with young patient who was dying of cancer on a
Saturday evening and the consultant on call was there throughout the
terminal process. I felt sad and helpless. I respected the calm way she
handled the situation" "Once when a particularly aggressive alcoholic patient
was admitted, just watching [the consultant] control the situation,
make his examination and treat a patient no one else could control" "A patient died. I thought it was my fault, but
consultant came on ward at 8 am to explain to me that it wasn't. I was
very grateful. He was extremely kind." Consultants as poor role models "Complaint was made about me by senior nurse. Consultant was
only willing to listen to my point of view. I was initially pleased
that he backed me, but should he not have supported her? He seemed
blasé, uninterested." "Consultant got angry on ward round when I couldn't
find the most recent blood tests because the notes were very big "My consultant handled a patient with cancer in a way
I thought was very bad. She turned to me and said (self satisfied), `I
used to have to run after my consultant when I was a house officer to
sort out people he had emotionally upset.' I could only agree!" Consultants as unethical role models "Consultant wanting to do an invasive procedure on a cancer
patient who would be dead within three days. I refused to fill in the
form. I was incredulous. I thought he was disrespectful, incompetent,
and mean." "After an unexpected death surgical consultant tried
to take advantage of my inexperience by asking me to write
retrospectively in notes." "While caring for a terminal patient their condition
deteriorated and I phoned up the consultant at home who told me to
administer a fatal dose of diamorphine. I said I didn't feel this was
appropriate as the patient needed to speak to relatives, etc, and he
eventually agreed." "Patient with gonococcal arthritis. I was asked to do
an HIV screen, but patient refused consent. Consultant got very angry
and demanded that we take off some blood and `just do it.' I refused.
Consultant walked off ward round and didn't speak to me for over a
week!"
people we can identify with, who have
qualities we would like to have, and are in positions we would like to
reach
have been shown as a way to inculcate professional values,
attitudes, and behaviours in students and young
doctors.
1 2
Because good role models are seen as
important in the making of a good doctor, we need to know more about
them. What are the attributes young people look for in role models? Are
these the attributes they really emulate? How do they react when they
find that seniors lack these attributes? We consider these questions
and whether we should rely on role models as a mechanism for developing
doctors who are more patient centred and ethically sensitive.
Summary points
Students and young doctors identify enthusiasm, compassion,
openness, integrity, and good relationships with patients as attributes
they seek in their role models
They are also drawn to senior figures who embody responsibility and
status
Some senior doctors show poor attitudes and unethical behaviour,
causing confusion, distress, and anger in young doctors and students
under their supervision
Role models may not be a dependable way to impart professional values,
attitudes, and behaviours
Professional behaviour and ethics should be explicitly taught through
peer group discussion, exposure to the views of people outside
medicine, and access to trained mentors
![]()
What qualities do students and young doctors look for in role
models?
![]()
Are these the qualities that students and junior doctors really
emulate?
![]()
Are these the qualities they find in their
teachers?
House officers' recollections of an exchange they had with a
consultant
he
snatched the top result sheet and complained it was out of date. The
correct results were found shortly after, and he put his arms around
me. I thought him irritable, unpredictable, and unprofessional."
In some cases students have reported seniors behaving in a way
that was frankly unethical and made them feel like accomplices in the
wrongdoing. Students who reported witnessing unethical behaviour were
more likely to report having done something unethical themselves, and
receiving more hours of ethics education made little difference to
reported unethical behaviour.13
| |
The consultant as role model |
|---|
Most consultants in the United Kingdom are trainers. Consultants entrusted with the educational supervision of doctors in their first year have a special responsibility for inculcating the principles of good medical practice, and the relationship between trainer and trainee is critical. We recently studied this relationship through a confidential survey of preregistration house officers across the United Kingdom.14 We asked respondents to describe an exchange with a supervising consultant that seemed important or interesting and to tell us how they felt about it (box).
In 59% of cases the described exchange was positive, with the young
doctor describing being praised or thanked, taught, given career advice
or support, socialised with, or offered an example of excellent patient
care. These house officers admired and respected their consultants.
They were likely to feel happy in their choice of medicine as a career
and to believe they would make good doctors. Twenty two per cent of the
house officers described a negative exchange, with the consultant
behaving badly towards them by making unreasonable demands or being
unfairly critical, sexist, or bullying. The words used to describe the
consultants
bastard, idiot, fathead, rude, arrogant, selfish, senile,
and pompous all recurred
give an idea of the vehement feelings aroused
in the young doctors by the behaviour described. In 7% of responses
the consultant was portrayed as incompetent, insensitive, or negligent
towards patients. House officers recalling these events spoke of their contempt, disbelief, frustration, or anger. These house officers were
the most likely to regret their choice of medicine as a career, though
whether their disillusionment was caused by the behaviour described or
led them to select a negative anecdote can only be speculative. The
exchanges included examples of consultant behaviour that was clearly
unethical and where the respondent felt pressured to collude in
wrongdoing. Students and junior doctors need to feel part of their team
and to be assessed favourably by their seniors, but if this is at the
price of their ethical values some of them are likely to become
confused and distressed. They appreciate the opportunity to discuss in
a safe environment the everyday ethical dilemmas they
encounter.15
| |
Role models and reform |
|---|
Medical schools have traditionally depended on good role
models as part of an informal curriculum of medical professionalism
a use that may be more or less acknowledged and organised. In this way
professional values, attitudes, and behaviours have been handed down
from generation to generation.
1 2
The important question is whether these values, attitudes, and behaviours are the ones that
will stand future clinicians in good stead as the health service of the
21st century develops.16
|
The cultural change that is so desperately needed to make doctors more
conscious of the patient's viewpoint has been long in coming. It may
be that dependence on role models to deliver the informal curriculum
has created a built-in resistance to change. We developed a
postgraduate training programme on clinical governance and continuous
quality improvement.17 It was a very successful course,
the highest rated feature of which was that it was interprofessional. No more than a third of participants came from any one professional group, and the facilitators made a point of exploring the diversity of
angles on each of the topics. The opportunity to hear different views
and see things from a different perspective was a revelation for many
young doctors. However, on their return to the clinical workplace they
complained that their seniors did not share these new insights, and it
was therefore hard to implement change. Without explicit training for
senior doctors, also undertaken in a interprofessional context, it was
unlikely that the learning would be sustained. The values, attitudes,
and behaviours that should characterise modern medical professionalism
need to be the topic of lifelong learning for all grades of staff.
| |
From role model to mentor |
|---|
Excellent role models will always inspire, teach by example, and excite admiration and emulation. Role models may have an impact on a large number of people, and individual students and young doctors may emulate different characteristics in a range of role models. However, being a role model is serendipitous: there is no training programme, appointment panel, or certificate. That you have been a role model for a young colleague can come as a surprise, either flattering or alarming, depending on your conscience. To paraphrase John Lennon, being a role model is what happens when you are busy doing other things.
Mentorship differs from role modelling in that the mentor is
actively engaged in an explicit two way relationship with the junior
colleague
a relationship that evolves and develops over time and can
be terminated by either party.
18 19
A good mentor is a
coach, asking questions more often than giving answers. Mentors have an
active role in guiding their junior colleagues as they develop their
own special attributes. The role is not an easy one and requires
training, time, and mutual trust.
| |
Role models, mentors, and the future of medicine |
|---|
Keeping medicine up to date with society's changing expectations and values is a continual struggle.20 We need to be more open to the views of other professionals, more aware of clinical error, more willing to discuss everyday ethical dilemmas, and more prepared to learn from our patients. Doctors at all levels need to be open about their need to learn. Changing the medical profession from one that is paternalistic to one that is self aware and quickly responsive to society's expectations is a difficult assignment. It won't happen by chance or through emulating our predecessors. It will require doctors at every level of seniority to be prepared to re-examine their own values, attitudes, and behaviour from the viewpoint of patients. Such reflection doesn't occur in a vacuum; it is stimulated by colleagues and patients who ask difficult questions and refuse to be put off by easy answers.
A healthy mentoring relationship is likely to provide the mental and
moral challenges essential to continuing self improvement. Ideally all
doctors
junior and senior
should be in such a relationship and have
the opportunity to reflect on performance and how it can be improved.
| |
References |
|---|
| 1. |
Swick HM, Szenas P, Danoff D, Whitcomb M.
Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education.
JAMA
1999;
282:
830-832 |
| 2. |
Wear D.
On white coats and professional development: the formal and the hidden curricula.
Ann Intern Med
1998;
129:
734-737 |
| 3. | Wright S. Examining what residents look for in their role models. Acad Med 1996; 71: 290-292[ISI][Medline]. |
| 4. | Wright S, Wong A, Newill C. The impact of role models on medical students. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 53-56[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Wright SM, Kern DE, Kolodner K, Howard DM, Brancati FL.
Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models.
N Engl J Med
1998;
339:
1986-1993 |
| 6. | Lublin JR. Role modelling: a case study in general practice. Med Educ 1992; 26: 116-122[ISI][Medline]. |
| 7. | Ambrozy DM, Irby DM, Bowen JL, Burack JH, Carline JD, Stritter FT. Role models' perceptions of themselves and their influence on students' specialty choices. Acad Med 1997; 72: 1119-1121[ISI][Medline]. |
| 8. | Sinclair S. Making doctors: an institutional apprenticeship. Oxford: Berg, 1997. |
| 9. | Whitehouse A. The way I see it: National competition ratios should be available for all HST applicants. BMJ 2002; 325(suppl): S55. |
| 10. | Beaudoin C, Maheux B, Cote L, Des Marchais JE, Jean P, Berkson L. Clinical teachers as humanistic care-givers and educators: perceptions of senior clerks and 2nd year residents. CMAJ 1998; 159: 765-769[Abstract]. |
| 11. | Cote L, Leclerc H. How clinical teachers perceive the doctor-patient relationship and themselves as role models. Acad Med 2000; 75: 1117-1124[ISI][Medline]. |
| 12. |
McMurray JE, Schwartz MD, Genero NP, Linzer M.
The attractiveness of internal medicine: a qualitative analysis of the experiences of female and male medical students.
Ann Intern Med
1993;
119:
812-818 |
| 13. | Feudtner C, Christakis DA, Christakis NA. Do clinical clerks suffer ethical erosion? Students' perceptions of their ethical environment and personal development. Acad Med 1994; 69: 670-679[ISI][Medline]. |
| 14. | Paice E, Moss F, Heard S, Winder B, McManus IC. The relationship between pre-registration house officers and their consultants. Med Educ 2002; 36: 26-34[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 15. | Kushner TK, Thomasma DC, eds. Ward ethics: dilemmas for medical students and doctors in training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. |
| 16. | Allen I. Committed but critical: an examination of young doctors' views of their core values. In: London: Health Policy and Economic Research Unit, BMA, 1997. |
| 17. | Heard SR, Schiller G, Aitken M, Fergie C, McCready Hall L. Continuous quality improvement: educating towards a culture of clinical governance. Qual Health Care 2001; 10(suppl 2): S70-S78. |
| 18. | Barondess J. On mentoring. J R Soc Med 1997; 90: 347-349[ISI][Medline]. |
| 19. | Sachdeva AK. Preceptorship, mentorship, and the adult learner in medical and health sciences education. J Cancer Educ 1996; 11: 131-136[Medline]. |
| 20. | Christakis N. The similarity and frequency of proposals to reform US medical education. Constant concerns. JAMA 1995; 274: 706-711[Abstract]. |
(Accepted 12 August 2002)
Read all Rapid Responses