Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Luc Baeyens a Sports Gynaecology Unit, Brugmann University
Hospital, B-1020 Brussels, Belgium, b Department of Radioisotopes, Institut J Bordet,
B-1000 Brussels Correspondence to: L Baeyens luc.baeyens{at}chu-brugmann.be
Many chronic injuries related to athletic bicycling are now
recognised: cyclist's nipples,1 neuropathic
syndromes,2 and skin problems caused by the saddle. We
have seen a new clinical problem in female high level cycling
competitors: bicyclist's vulva (figure).
Six women, aged 21-38 years, had a unilateral chronic swelling of
the labium majus after a few years of intensive bicycling (an average
of 462.5 km per week). All six had typical unilateral lymphoedema (five
on the right side, one on the left) which was more severe after more
intense and longer training. The position of the bicycle saddle, the
type of shorts worn, and the women's perineal hygiene were optimum.
There was no family history of lymphoedema in any of the women, nor any
common factor that might explain the lymphoedema.
All six women regularly had inflammatory skin problems related to the
saddle and five had scars and perineal lesions such as chafing,
perineal folliculitis, and nodules. Further clinical and ultrasound
examination showed no pelvic anomaly.
Three of the cyclists (aged 27, 21, and 21 years) underwent three phase
lymphoscintigraphy of their legs.3 We found similar lymphatic anomalies in all three. One had bilateral intra-abdominal abnormalities at the level of the iliac nodes and functional
insufficiency of the superficial lymphatic system on the left side, the
same side as the oedematous labium majus. In the other two, who
presented with oedema of the right labium majus, lymphoscintigrams
showed decreased uptake at the height of the right lumboaortic nodes. One of these two also had some inguinal nodes in the right groin. A
previous study found no lymphatic abnormalities in the general population.3
Two women (aged 23 and 38 years) refused lymphoscintigraphy for
personal reasons. The fifth woman (aged 34 years) was not offered the
procedure owing to a history of pelvic surgery for endofibrosis of the
external iliac artery, a syndrome seen in high level competition
cyclists.4 In this patient, unilateral lymphoedema of the
vulva was present before vascular surgery and resolved only partially
after the vascular intervention. None of the other five cyclists
presented symptoms of this vascular compression syndrome.
Cyclists with unilateral chronic swelling of the labium majus had
similar lymphoscintigraphic abnormalities in their pelvis and
homolateral leg.
Vulvar lymphoedema may be caused by a combination of chronic
inflammation in the vulvoperineal area We have yet to conduct prospective lymphoscintigraphic studies in a
random sample of competitive cyclists. It is possible, in these women,
that lymphatic disease existed before (latent lymphoedema) but was
exposed by their intensive bicycling. The lymph nodes can be abnormal
in lymphoedema praecox (affecting patients 2 to 35 years old) and tarda
(affecting patients older than 35 years old).
In addition to standard measures for preventing saddle
lesions,2 we recommend thorough care of any lesion of the
vulvoperineal region. Elevation of the lower limbs during rest periods
contributes to a better lymph drainage of the perineum and pelvis.
Oedema may be reduced by applying cold compresses on the vulvoperineal region after training and by physiotherapy that stimulates alternative lymph drainage pathways.5

Bicyclist's vulva
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
![]()
Comment
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
very common in competitive cyclists
with damage to lymphatic vessels and repeated compression of
the inguinal lymphatic vessels due to the curved posture of the
cyclists. Both of these factors could contribute to alterations in
lymphatic circulation in the vulvoperineal area. The abnormalities seen
by lymphoscintigraphy might ultimately lead to more generalised lymphoedema of the legs.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Monique Van Noten for secretarial assistance.
Contributors: LB discovered the first case. The other women were seen by LB and EV. PB, carried out the lymphoscintigraphies, assisted by LB and EV. LB, EV, and PB wrote the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: No additional funding.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Powell B.
Bicyclist's nipples.
JAMA
1983;
249:
2457 |
| 2. | Mellion MB. Common cycling injuries: management and prevention. Sports Med 1991; 11: 52-70[Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 3. | Bourgeois P, Munck D, Becker C, Leduc O, Leduc A. A three-phase lymphoscintigraphic investigation protocol for the evaluation of lower limb edemas. Eur J Lymphol 1997; 6: 10-21. |
| 4. | Abraham P, Saumet JL, Chevalier JM. External iliac artery endofibrosis in athletes. Sports Med 1997; 24: 221-226[Medline]. |
| 5. | Rubin JR, Eberlin LB. The effect of inguinal lymphatic manipulation on regional lymph flow patterns. J Vasc Surg 1993; 17: 896-900[Medline]. |
(Accepted 30 January 2002)
Mary Ann Elston Department of Social and Political Science,
Royal Holloway College, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX
The typical female cyclist in the United Kingdom is
unlikely to be clocking up an average 462.5 km per week. For most of
us, the risk of serious harm from contact between body and bike is probably insignificant compared with that arising from contact between
bike and motor vehicle (hence the emergence of the leisure cycle
trails, accessed largely by car).
In 2002, the report of a form of vulval damage, possibly caused
or exacerbated by intensive bicycling training, and possibly implicated
in more extensive lymphatic disease, seems unlikely to generate wide
scale public debate about the desirability of women engaging in cycling
in general. Nor do the authors themselves raise concerns about whether
high level competitive cycling is a suitable activity for women. Their
affiliation to a sport gynaecology clinic is an expression of the
institutionalisation of competitive sports for women by the beginning
of the 21st century. The risks to women of such participation are seen
as warranting special surveillance and expert management but not as
grounds for women's exclusion from high level competition.
The same report a century ago might have taken a different view. In the
late 19th century, the coming of the (relatively) cheap safety bicycle
revolutionised personal transport and recreation for people of all ages
and classes and of both sexes. By the 1890s, the sight of large numbers
of women pedalling freely was "a sign of dramatically changing
times."1 To some, this "new woman" on the roads
conveyed a welcome image of female vitality and independence, with its
encouragement of more rational dress and reduced chaperonage. (In 1904, the women students of Girton College, Cambridge, were permitted to ride
to lectures after dark, unaccompanied by a don, if in groups of at
least three.1) For others, women's passion for cycling
was more like a harbinger of doom for the imperial race, through the
deleterious impact of excessive strain and jolting on women's
reproductive systems.
The medical profession, not surprisingly, expressed its views on
this matter in the BMJ and elsewhere; views which were, by no means, all hostile. According to Dr W H Fenton, when women began
bicycling, there was much "solemn wagging of grey beards and a low
pitched murmur of `grave consequences' to be anticipated" from
doctors, particularly those too old and too conscious of their dignity
to have actually tried bicycling.2 But, by 1896, with
improvements to bicycles and some years of the experiment, Fenton
opined confidently, "an organically sound woman can cycle with as
much impunity as a man." If women "cycle on commonsense terms for
pleasure and health, the sex and the community at large will greatly
benefit, and all prejudices will be assuredly
overcome."2 Most doctors' support was conditional on
women's exercise of commonsense, most having "wisely set their faces
against racing and record breaking. Both are physiological
crimes."2 The Cycle Touring Club of Great Britain
admitted women as full members from 1880, but the club refused to allow
women's racing, on grounds of propriety and female physiology for
several decades. Women's bicycling for pleasure or for convenience,
for improving their fitness to be mothers, it seems, was one thing;
taking it seriously, behaving competitively, training their bodies, as
if they were men, was quite another.
![]()
References
1.
McCrone KE.
Sport and the physical emancipation of English women, 1870-1914.
London: Routledge, 1988:183.
2.
Fenton WH.
A medical view of cycling for ladies.
The Nineteenth Century
1896;
39:
799-800.
© BMJ 2002
Read all Rapid Responses