Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR We conducted an audit of all patients admitted with unstable angina or
acute myocardial infarction in a local trust between July 1999 and June
2000. Information was obtained on age, sex, ethnic group, and Carstairs
socioeconomic deprivation category derived from postcode of residence.
Record linkage to subsequent hospital episode statistics provided
follow up information on procedures up to 18 months after admission.
Data on 53 south Asians and 1556 white patients were analysed using
logistic regression models.
We found higher access to angiography and coronary artery bypass
grafting among south Asian compared with white patients in the
univariate analysis. We found no difference in access to angiography (odds ratio=0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.83) or coronary artery bypass grafting (1.27, 0.62 to 2.62) between south Asian and
white patients after controlling for age, sex, and Carstairs deprivation category.
Despite the small sample size, lack of control for severity, or
appropriateness we have shown that access can be audited by ethnic
group using routine data. Many trusts may currently have the ability to
carry out such audit, especially in areas with high ethnic minority
populations. It may not be long before national audit of ethnic data on
access to procedures is possible.
Feder et al reported findings from the appropriateness of
coronary revascularisation (ACRE) study showing that among patients
deemed clinically appropriate for coronary artery bypass grafting,
south Asians are less likely than white patients to undergo
procedures.1 They pointed out the lack of a mechanism to
monitor ethnic differences in invasive management of coronary disease
in the NHS. The quality of hospital episode statistics has improved
significantly in many trusts since the ACRE study. In 1999-2000 the
quality index for our local trust data on ethnic group was 92.8%
compared with a national average of 65.4%.2 This
contrasts with a rate of invalid coding in 1995-6 of
62.9%.3
David Kanka
Public Health Laboratory Service Communicable Disease
Surveillance Centre Eastern, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2
2SR iad21{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk
| 1. |
Feder G, Crook AM, Magee P, Banerjee S, Timmis A, Hemingway H.
Ethnic differences in invasive management of coronary disease: prospective cohort study of patients undergoing angiography.
BMJ
2002;
324:
511-516 |
| 2. | Department of Health. HES data quality
report 1999/00. www.doh.gov.uk/hes/data_quality/dqi99/rgn99.html
(accessed 5 Mar 2002).
|
| 3. | Aspinall PJ. The mandatory collection of data on ethnic group of inpatients: experience of NHS trusts in England in the first reporting years. Public Health 2000; 114: 254-259[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |