Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Anne Scoular a Department of Genitourinary Medicine,
Sandyford Initiative, Glasgow G3 7NB, b Robertson Centre for
Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, c West of
Scotland Specialist Virology Centre, Gartnavel General Hospital,
Glasgow G12 0XN, d Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Russell
Institute, Paisley PA1 1UR Correspondence to: A Scoular anne{at}scoular.demon.co.uk
Although herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is regarded as
causing most cases of genital herpes, preliminary reports suggest that
the type 1 virus (HSV-1) is increasingly the cause of
infection.1 Recurrence rates, viral shedding, and the mode
of acquiring HSV-1 infection are different from those for HSV-2, so
counselling and clinical management strategies may need to be revised.
We studied longitudinal trends in laboratory reports of genital HSV-1 infection.
The West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre processes 99% of
all herpes simplex virus culture samples in the region. All genital
samples of herpes simplex processed between 1 January 1986 and 31 December 2000 were reviewed for source of referral, patient's sex and
age (stratified into seven bands: Samples were cultured and then typed using fluorescein labelled
monoclonal antibodies to HSV-1 and HSV-2 (Syva Microtrak). From January
1999, the virus was detected and typed using a polymerase chain
reaction method and restriction fragment length
polymorphism.2 The referral patterns and age and sex
profiles of patients did not change during the period of analysis.
We compared the proportion of HSV-1 in all positive swabs between sexes
and ages using Of 10 547 swabs, the virus was identified in 3181 (30%); 3126 were
typed, 1530 (49%) as HSV-1 and 1596 (51%) as HSV-2. Of the swabs
testing positive for HSV, 2004 (63%) were from women and 1177 (37%)
were from men. Age was recorded for 3099 (97.4%) patients, with 555 (18%) aged
![]()
Methods and results
Top
Methods and results
Comment
References
20, 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40, 41-45, and >45 years), and the type of virus isolated.
2 tests, and over the three year time
bands by the Cochran Armitage trend test (both overall and within four
subgroups with age categorised as
25 years or >25 years for each
sex) using SAS 8.2.
20, 885 (29%) aged 21-25, 686 (22%) aged 26-30, 413 (13%) aged 31-35, 239 (8%) aged 36-40, 159 (5%) aged 41-45, and 162 (5%) aged >45 years. The origin of the request to detect the virus
was recorded for 10 476 (99%) samples: 7579 (72%) were from
genitourinary medicine clinics, 678 (6%) from general practice, 223 (2%) from family planning clinics, and 1996 (19%) from other
sources.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Proportion (%) of herpes simplex virus test that were type
1
HSV-1 was strongly associated with female sex and younger age
(P<0.0001). Over the entire study period, HSV-1 was found in 751 (70%) of all positive swabs in women <25 years, 141 (41%) in men
<25 years, 413 (49%) in women
25 years, and 182 (23%) in men
25 years.
In 1986-8, 33% (187) of all positive swabs were due to HSV-1, rising
progressively to 56% (548) in 1998-2000 (P<0.0001). A significant
rise (P<0.0001, 1986 v 2000) in the proportion of isolates
attributable to HSV-1 occurred in each of the four age and sex
subgroups (P<0.0001) (figure).
| |
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both the number and percentage of genital HSV-1 infections have risen. Genital infection with HSV-1 is strongly associated with being young (aged <25 years) and being female.
Explanations include changing host susceptibility and changing sexual behaviour of the population. The population seroprevalence of HSV-1 is falling: increasing numbers of young adults are susceptible to HSV-1 infection.3 As genital tract reactivation of latent HSV-1 infection is infrequent, most new cases of genital HSV-1 infection are likely to be due to orogenital transmission, but there is no evidence suggesting that oral sex practices have changed substantially.4 The occurrence of HSV-1 infection in women, seen consistently in other studies,1 is unexplained.
These results have three important implications for management.
Firstly, patients should be counselled about the more favourable clinical course of genital HSV-1 than of HSV-2 infection; recurrences are generally milder and infrequent. Secondly, subclinical shedding of
HSV-1 is less common; this has a direct bearing on the likelihood of
transmission.5 Thirdly, preventive strategies for genital herpes should focus on the risk of unprotected orogenital intercourse, which is frequently perceived as "safe" in the context of sexually transmitted infections.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Geoffrey Clements, previously director of the West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre.
Contributors: AS initiated and designed the study, analysed and interpreted the results, and wrote the paper. JN and NM analysed and interpreted the results and wrote the paper. GG contributed to the study design and analysis of results. WC contributed to the study design, analysis, and interpretation of the results. AS is guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: No additional funding.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Lamey P-J, Hyland PL. Changing epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 1 infections. Herpes 1999; 6: 20-24. |
| 2. |
Scoular A, Gillespie G, Carman WF.
Polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of genital herpes in a genitourinary medicine clinic.
Sex Transm Infect
2002;
78:
21-25 |
| 3. |
Vyse AJ, Gay NJ, Slomka M, Gopal R, Gibbs T, Morgan-Capner P, et al.
The burden of infection with HSV-1 and HSV-2 in England and Wales: implications for the changing epidemiology of genital herpes.
Sex Transm Infect
2000;
76:
183-187 |
| 4. | Johnson AM, Wadsworth J, Wellings K, Field J. Sexual attitudes and lifestyles. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1994. |
| 5. | Lafferty WE, Coombs RW, Benedetti J, Critchlow C, Corey L. Recurrences after oral and genital herpes simplex virus infection: influence of site of infection and viral type. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1444-1449[Abstract]. |
(Accepted 3 December 2001)
Read all Rapid Responses