New consent rules threaten public health

New guidance on patient consent and confidentiality could compromise disease surveillance activities, putting the health of the public at serious risk. Verity and Nicoll (p 1210) argue that such restrictions would so damage surveillance procedures that they would cease to protect the health of the public, resulting in preventable ill health and deaths. The public should be made aware of the importance of surveillance, and organisations that determine health policy should consider issues related to health surveillance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Education and debate: Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance • Commentary: Don't waive consent lightly---involve the public
Chris Verity, Angus Nicoll, and Donal Manning
BMJ 2002 324: 1210-1213. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ