Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Reduction in juniors' hours abolishes concept of continuity of care
EDITOR The reduction in junior doctors' hours does not satisfy trainee
surgeons' need for operative experience and abolishes the concept of
continuity of care. All surgeons (trainees and consultants) understand
that a patient deserves and requires continual care by the same firm
for the duration of his or her admission. Pickersgill and others need
to realise that trainee doctors' needs differ across the specialties
and that many other professionals work long hours. It is time that the
senate of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons said no to Europe's directives.
The gloating editorial by Pickersgill, the chairperson of the
BMA's Junior Doctors Committee, convinces me that the BMJ
is now the magazine for the coffee table of the politically active
lily-livered doctors who populate the NHS.1 The smile will
be wiped off Pickersgill's face if ever he is unfortunate enough to
need an operation.
Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital, London SE5
9RS David.Scott-Coombes{at}kcl.ac.uk
| 1. |
Pickersgill T.
The European working time directive for doctors in training.
BMJ
2001;
323:
1266 |
Profession needs to modernise surgical training
EDITOR We must separate service provision from training and learn from the
healthcare systems in the United States and Europe, where qualified
physician assistants (professionally trained non-medical staff) are
employed routinely to share the workload with the junior staff.
Trainers who are willing to initiate change must give a strong,
enthusiastic lead in improving training, which has long been unstructured, repetitive, and at times irrelevant to the specialty ambitions of trainees.2 The standards for surgical
practice should be clearly monitored and enforced, and frequent formal independent assessment, such as the record of in-training assessments and assessment by the specialist advisory committees, will help. It is
essential that both trainers and trainees are assessed, with the royal
colleges encouraging all consultants to improve their training
abilities. Good trainers should be recognised, and bad ones should be
excluded from training programmes.
The organisation of theoretical training (at local or regional level)
should ensure that specific topics are taught in coordinated lectures
or courses, when trainees from the same deanery are free from clinical
commitments. During practical training, ward rounds and outpatient
clinics should be educational. In addition, trainees must have hands-on
experience in the operating theatre, with proper supervision,
instruction, and practice. This may be difficult to achieve in the NHS,
which is already limited in time and resources. Consequently, an
increased amount of training in surgical skills has to be done with
simulators (for example, latex models of organs, laparoscopic boxes),
anaesthetised animals (for laparoscopic and endovascular procedures),
or computer generated virtual reality (for example, laparoscopy,
endoscopy).3 Such facilities must be widely available to
all trainees.
Finally, the assessment of operative skill needs to become more
objective and independent.4 Assessment methods (such as the objective structured assessment of technical skills or the Imperial
College surgical assessment device) are already available. Detecting
underperformance early would allow further training and guidance. We
need to reappraise, reform, and modernise surgical training rather than
blame Europe for cutting junior doctors' working hours.
ycchan88{at}hotmail.com
To ensure better surgical training in shorter
hours1 a more structured and focused approach must be
adopted. With the introduction of the new deal, Calman report, and
European working time directive, the time available to train a surgeon is now reduced by more than two thirds. Further reductions in working
hours threaten to jeopardise the effective continuation of patient care
and compromise training, resulting in inexperienced surgeons.
Fundamental reform must now take place to guarantee high surgical standard.
Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital, London SE5
9RS
1.
Pickersgill T.
The European working time directive for doctors in training.
BMJ
2001;
323:
1266. (1 December.)
2.
Taffinder N.
Better surgical training in shorter hours.
J R Soc Med
1999;
92:
329-331[Medline].
3.
Torkington J, Smith SG, Rees BI, Darzi A.
The role of simulation in surgical training.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
2000;
82:
88-94[ISI][Medline].
4.
Darzi A, Datta V, Mackay S.
The challenge of objective assessment of surgical skill.
Am J Surg
2001;
181:
484-486[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
© BMJ 2002
Read all Rapid Responses