Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Most BMJ readers will have studied
pathology but forgotten most of what they knew. You don't, however,
need to be much of a pathologist to see the infarct that scars the
brain on the cover (or on the homepage of bmj.com). Such a stroke is
something to be avoided, and a trial on p 699 shows that the
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril will reduce by a third
the risk of stroke and transient ischaemic attacks in patients with
high cardiovascular risk. Hypertension is the major risk factor for
stroke, but, as an editorial discusses (p 687), ramipril reduces the
risk of stroke even in patients with normal blood pressure. It may work
through a protective effect on the vascular wall.
Another possible way to prevent the death of brain tissue in stroke may
be to use thrombolytic therapy. We know that it works in myocardial
infarction, and some believe that it works in acute stroke (p
727) These disagreements are inevitable and the stuff of scientific and
clinical debate. Unfortunately the advice of the American Heart
Association is tainted by undeclared conflicts of interest (p 723). The
association itself has received $11m (£7.8m; But Meanwhile, 3500 doctors in Germany are currently being investigated by
the district attorney for having taken funds and excessive hospitality
from SmithKline Beecham (p 693). Doctors were invited to conferences to
hear about angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors but then taken to
the final of the world soccer championships or to formula one races.
Corruption comes in a different form in Nigeria, where drugs for
preventing stroke are often fake (p 698). Some are made locally,
but others come from China, Pakistan, Indonesia, Egypt, and India.
while others are less sure (p 726). The American Heart
Association recently upgraded its advice on the use of alteplase (tPA)
from optional (class IIb) to definitely recommended (class I) (p 723).
Various other bodies are, however, unconvinced by the evidence, and one
member of the American Heart Association panel dissented from the advice.
12.6m) from Genentech,
the US manufacturers of alteplase, and six of the eight panellists had
financial ties to the manufacturer. Might these conflicts of interest
have influenced the advice from the association? We can't know. Even
those who produced the advice can't know
because bias is largely unconscious.
like it or not
we live in an age where what is not open may
well be considered to be biased, corrupt, or incompetent. So those
producing guidelines must declare all conflicts of interest. Problems
rarely result from disclosure, but failure to disclose creates
anxieties. The Association of British Neurologists is about to declare
its own conflicts and of those who write its guidelines on its website,
and Charles Warlow, professor of neurology in Edinburgh, suggests that
such conflicts should be quantified (p 726). "Accepting a ham
sandwich may not colour one's attitude, but what about a million
pounds . . . readers can then judge how much it takes
to make the professor spin a little this way or that."
Footnotes
To receive Editor's choice by email each week subscribe via our website: www.bmj.com/cgi/customalert
Read all Rapid Responses