Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Evidence favouring a negative correlation between income inequality and life expectancy has disappeared
In 1992, the BMJ published a now famous
paper showing a strong negative correlation between income inequality
and life expectancy. Among nine Western industrialised countries those
which had less income inequality seemed to have higher life
expectancy.1 A few years later this was replicated in
analyses looking at income inequality and mortality in states within
the United States A novel area of research was born, adding new perspectives to
conventional studies of health inequalities. These had tended to focus
on relations between socioeconomic factors and health of the
individual, while the findings on income inequality suggested that
contextual effects of inequality might be just as important. Considerable dissent, however, emerged on the explanation of these effects. Some favoured softer psychosocial pathways (for example through feelings of relative deprivation, or disruption of social cohesion) while others favoured harder material pathways (for example
through underinvestment in public resources).4-6 Support was found for some of these mechanisms, which are also important in
their own right, and the debate on income inequality versus mortality
acted as a strong stimulus for further work on factors such as social
cohesion and social capital.7 Although most of the papers
dealt with mortality or life expectancy as measures of the health of
the population, results from geographical analyses within the United
States suggested possible effects of income inequality on self rated
health as well.8
All along, however, critical questions were being asked about the
quality and interpretation of the data. In an early exchange, serious
criticisms of the selection of countries, the quality of the data, and
the lack of control for confounding in the BMJ paper of 1992 were only half countered.
9 10
Although many aspects of
this debate are still unresolved, it has recently become clear that the
findings in that paper were an artefact of the selection of countries.
Now that good data on income inequality have become available for 16 western industrialised countries, the association between income
inequality and life expectancy has
disappeared.11
This reduces the evidence favouring the correlation of income
inequality and mortality almost entirely to analyses of geographical units within the United States. An interesting comparison between the
United States and Canada had already shown that this correlation at the
level of states exists only in the former, and on the basis of the
available evidence we can conclude that the United States is the
exception.12 But even within the United States it is not
certain that the association reflects a contextual effect of income
inequality on everyone's mortality. It has been shown that the
association between income inequality and mortality at the aggregate
level could theoretically be the result of a curvilinear relation
between the two at the individual level, a finding which would remove
the need to postulate a contextual effect.
13 14
This can
only be resolved with data on mortality that permit a simultaneous
analysis of effects of income on mortality at the individual and
aggregate (for example, state) level, and such data are
scarce.15 For self rated health such data are easier to
find, and multilevel analyses of the effects of income inequality on
self rated health, controlling for the effects of individual income,
have produced inconsistent results, but mostly suggest that, at least
within the United States, there may be an independent but small effect
of income inequality on self rated health.
8 16-19
This issue contains four papers which add new elements to this overall
picture.20-23 Osler et al present the results of an analysis of mortality in a small area in Copenhagen, Denmark (p 13),
and they use the type of multilevel data that we need to disentangle
the effects of income on mortality at the aggregate level from those at
the individual level.20 They find no association between
income inequality and mortality after adjustment for individual income
and suggest that the Danish welfare state evens out differences in the
effect on mortality of income inequality between areas.20 Another possible explanation is that some of the possible pathways linking income inequality and mortality cannot be expected to operate
at this low geographical level. Would individuals feel relatively
deprived because of a comparison with others' incomes in the same
small area, or because of comparisons within a larger social
environment? Would income inequality be associated with underinvestment in public resources within the same small area, or
would this mechanism operate on a larger geographical scale? It would
be useful to replicate these analyses with different geographical
scales, and in different European countries.
Muller shows that most of the correlation between income inequality and
mortality at the aggregate level in the United States can be explained
away by differences in average levels of formal education
(p 23).21 This is not surprising in itself, because others have shown before that income inequality is strongly and negatively associated with measures of educational achievement in the
United States.2 The main issue is whether we should see
educational achievement as a confounder or an intermediary between
income inequality and mortality. One could argue that high levels of
income inequality, and the associated underinvestment in public
resources, might in the long run lead to lower levels of educational
achievement. This would then make educational achievement an
intermediary on the causal path from income inequality to mortality. On
the other hand, it is unlikely that variations at the level of the
state in educational achievement are entirely due to variations in
income, so confounding may also be involved. We urgently need better
conceptual frameworks Shibuya et al present the results of an interesting study from Japan,
where income inequality is reported to have increased substantially
over the past decade (p 16).22 They show that, although
income inequality at the level of prefectures is weakly associated with
poor or fair self rated health, this is no longer so when individual
income is controlled for. Income measured at the individual level is an
important determinant of self rated health in Japan and because income
inequality is an important determinant of variations in individual
income it does not need to have an independent effect to deserve the
attention of policymakers.
Finally, Sturm and Gresenz look at the effects of income inequality in
the United States on self reported chronic conditions and depressive
and anxiety disorder as assessed by clinical screeners (p 20).23 Again, strong associations exist with
individual income, but even without controlling for individual income
there are no indications for an effect of income inequality as such.
Overall these papers reinforce the idea that the evidence for a
correlation between income inequality and the health of the population
is slowly dissipating. There is very little confirmation of such a
relation outside the United States. Within the United States it has
still to be convincingly demonstrated that it is not due to curvilinear
individual level relationships and confounding. This should give no
reason for concern Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO
Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands (mackenbach{at}mgz.fgg.eur.nl)
analyses which seemed more secure because of having
more and better quality data.
2 3
These findings, which
suggested that income inequality is bad for the health of the whole
population and not only for those with the lowest incomes, were seen to
have important implications. Reducing the inequality would be in
everyone's interest, including those with higher incomes.
with input from economics, education, science,
and other disciplines
if we want to make progress based on empirical
analyses like this.
after all, conjecture and refutation are science's
core business. In the process, new research avenues have opened and a
better understanding of the potential importance of contextual factors
for population health has emerged. Most importantly, perhaps, the
powerful impact of individual income on mortality has been rediscovered
and still demands the urgent attention of policymakers and politicians
around the world.
| 1. | Wilkinson RG. Income distribution and life expectancy. BMJ 1992; 304: 165-168. |
| 2. |
Kaplan GA, Pamuk ER, Lynch JW, Cohen RD, Balfour JL.
Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: analysis of mortality and potential pathways.
BMJ
1996;
312:
999-1003 |
| 3. |
Kennedy BP, Kawachi I, Prothrow-Stith D.
Income distribution and mortality: cross-sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States.
BMJ
1996;
312:
1004-1007 |
| 4. | Wilkinson RG. Unfair shares. Ilford: Barnardo's, 1994. |
| 5. |
Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Lochner K, Prothrow-Stith D.
Social capital, income inequality and mortality.
Am J Public Health
1997;
87:
1491-1498 |
| 6. |
Lynch JW, Davey-Smith G, Kaplan GA, House JS.
Income inequality and mortality: importance of individual income, psychosocial environment or material pathways in health.
BMJ
2000;
320:
1200-1204 |
| 7. |
Kawachi I.
Social capital and community effects on population and individual health.
Ann N Y Acad Sci
1999;
896:
120-130 |
| 8. |
Kennedy BP, Kawachi I, Glass R, Prothrow-Stith D.
Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and self rated health in the United States: multilevel analysis.
BMJ
1998;
317:
917-921 |
| 9. |
Judge K.
Income distribution and life expectancy: a critical appraisal.
BMJ
1995;
311:
1282-1285 |
| 10. |
Wilkinson RG.
Commentary: A reply to Ken Judge: mistaken criticisms ignore overwhelming evidence.
BMJ
1995;
311:
1285-1287 |
| 11. | Lynch J, Davey-Smith G, Hillemeier M, Shaw M, Raghunathan T, Kaplan G. Income inequality, the psycho-social environment and health: comparisons of wealthy nations. Lancet 2001; 358: 194-200[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Ross NA, Wolfson MC, Dunn JR, Berthelot J-M, Kaplan GA, Lynch JW.
Relation between income inequality and mortality in Canada and in the United States: cross-sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics.
BMJ
2000;
320:
898-902 |
| 13. |
Gravelle H.
How much of the relation between population mortality and unequal distribution of income is a statistical artefact?
BMJ
1998;
316:
382-385 |
| 14. | Wagstaff A, Van Doorslaer E. Income inequality and health: what does the literature tell us? Annu Rev Public Health 2000; 21: 543-567[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Lochner K, Pamuk E, Makuc D, Kennedy BP, Kawachi I.
State-level income inequality and individual mortality risk: a prospective, multilevel study.
Am J Public Health
2001;
91:
351-353 |
| 16. | Soobader MJ, LeClere FB. Aggregation and the measurement of income inequality: effects morbidity. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 733-744. |
| 17. |
LeClere FB, Soobader MJ.
The effect of income inequality on the health of selected US demographic groups.
Am J Public Health
2000;
90:
1892-1897 |
| 18. | Fiscella K, Franks P. Individual income, income inequality, health, and mortality: what are the relationships? Health Serv Res 2000; 35: 307-318[ISI][Medline]. |
| 19. | Mellor JM, Milyo J. Reexamining the evidence of an ecological association between income inequality and health. J Health Politics Policy Law 2001; 26: 487-522[Abstract]. |
| 20. |
Osler M, Prescott E, Grønbæk M, Christensen U, Due P, Engholm G.
Income inequality, individual income, and mortality in Danish adults: analysis of pooled data from two cohort studies.
BMJ
2002;
324:
13-16 |
| 21. |
Muller A.
Education, income inequality, and mortality: a multiple regression analysis.
BMJ
2002;
324:
23-25 |
| 22. |
Shibuya K, Hashimoto H, Yano E.
Individual income, income distribution, and self rated health in Japan: cross sectional analysis of nationally representative sample.
BMJ
2002;
324:
16-19 |
| 23. |
Sturm R, Gresenz CR.
Relations of income inequality and family income to chronic medical conditions and mental health disorders: national survey in USA.
BMJ
2002;
324:
20-23 |
Read all Rapid Responses