Australian and English courts are becoming more patient centred

In the past decade both English and Australian courts have adopted a more patient centred standard in deciding what risks doctors must disclose to patients, leading to an increase in litigation costs for clinical negligence. In Australia, the courts have held doctors negligent for failure to disclose risks in a number of cases, including anal stenosis after haemorrhoidectomy, perforation of the uterus after insertion of an interuterine device, and hypertrophic scarring after laser removal of tattoos. Skene and Smallwood (p 39) recommend that Australian and English courts put more emphasis on the needs of patients to give greater weight to individual rights in both countries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Informed consent: lessons from Australia
Loane Skene and Richard Smallwood
BMJ 2002 324: 39-41. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ