Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
The Christmas issue contains three people's description of their ideal medical school.
Read the descriptions:
View the results of the voting
Tell us why you voted the way
you did
Read what others have had to say
Jeremy Anderson Centre for Clinical
Effectiveness, Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash
University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
The Rabelais School will produce graduates who are as
comfortable in the shit as they are in the stars This medical school takes François Rabelais
(c1494-1553), Franciscan monk, Bachelor of Medicine, and
humanist, as its muse. Although his inspirational work Gargantua
and Pantagruel celebrates his abilities as a satirist and
misogynist, his role as an educationalist has been overlooked. "He
was a man intoxicated by every sort of learning and theory,"
according to one translator, "who, at the same time, had the
earthy common sense of a peasant."1 In an increasingly
divided world, with medicine increasingly preoccupied by technical
elitism, Rabelais stands as a cogent model.
and understand that the pathology they observe in humanity is equally present in themselves

A Gargantuan project
The Rabelais School follows the "mischievous rascal" tendency of scientific humanism, through Voltaire ("The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease") to Sir William Osler ("One of the first duties of the physician is to educate the masses not to take medicine"). It acknowledges Osler as the seminal medicinal nihilist of the modern era, whose general iconoclasm and demand for proof of efficacy before using a drug anticipated the later glories of evidence based practice.2 An eminently qualified heir to this tradition, David Sackett, encapsulates the approach of the Rabelais School with his remark, "Textbooks don't smell as their contents rot, so readers will need to develop alternative crap detectors to avoid poisoning their minds and robbing their patients of current best care."3
But there are times when even this approach will fail. Faculty members
of the Rabelais School exemplify those strategies of decision making
that Isaacs and Fitzgerald nominate as alternative to evidence:
eminence, vehemence, eloquence, providence, diffidence, nervousness,
and confidence.4 Role modelling plays a crucial part in
the pedagogic framework of the Rabelais School
we choose our clinical
skills' tutors with care.
| |
The role of research |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the new millennium the research endeavour exemplifies all that is best in modern medicine. Rabelais anticipated this 450 years ago. Much of his inspirational Gargantua and Pantagruel is an investigation of the research hypothesis that all husbands are inevitably cuckolds. To investigate the question Pantagruel convenes a multidisciplinary expert panel, which provides conflicting advice. After this he embarks on an allegorical journey, rich with incident, eccentricity, and treasure, a metaphor for the process of scientific discovery. It ends at the Temple of the Bottle, dedicated to Bacchus, where the waters of the fountain of knowledge taste of different varieties of wine according to the preconceptions of the drinkers. The research question remains unresolved but clearly in need of further study.
|
Characteristics of Rabelais graduates
|
The Rabelais School teaches students to spin the straw of unanswered
questions into the gold of medical research. Students know that the
pharmaceutical industry, the most lucrative industry in the United
States, earns profits of around 20% of its revenues.5 They also know that, like the fountain of knowledge, industry funded
research seems to reflect the preconceptions of its
sponsors.6 They fully appreciate that a few years of
ballpoint pens and free lunches through medical school can translate
into a practising lifetime of sponsored conferences and overseas
travel, with all costs borne by their patients and other
taxpayers.7 Accordingly, an important part of the Rabelais
curriculum will be the research semester, during which student groups
undertake research projects that are graded according to the amounts of
sponsored funding, equipment, meals, and air miles generated.
| |
Personal and professional development |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The unique approach of the Rabelais School of Medicine will find
its highest expression in the personal and professional development curriculum. Pastoral care is taken seriously and is based on the Rabelais commitment to move beyond theoretical study to experiential learning. Rabelais wrote movingly of food (war declared over a disputed
recipe; coveted dishes like "couills d'eveque"
bishop's testicles) but reserved his best praise for wine, which is to be
consumed in huge amounts on every conceivable occasion. He extolled the
medicinal properties of drink at length, saying, "A hundred devils
leap into my body if there aren't more old drunkards than old
physicians." His intoxicated spirit would have relished those more
recent doctors who extended his preoccupation to other substances. The
Rabelais School takes inspiration from this and the opinions of naive
subjects like Richard Smith ("a world without drugs is unachievable
and probably intolerable")8 and the experience of drug
misusers like cocaine addict Sigmund Freud, father of psychoanalysis;
morphine addict William Halsted, father of radical mastectomy; and LSD
maven Humphrey Osmond, father of psychedelics.9-11
Communication skills workshops, university transition training, teamwork groups, community immersion projects, and business practice mentorships will all have a place but it is the neuropsychopharmacology practicum that sets the curriculum apart. This is a compulsory, three month, residential placement for first year students at Thélème Hall (motto: "Do as you will"1). The practicum provokes students to explore self expression, personal relationships, group work, and their choice of recreational drugs in an experiential, "Inward Bound" learning environment. Closed circuit television cameras capture all aspects of the practicum to provide postmodern self referentiality and subsidise teaching. Expenses are realised by repackaging the material as a TV series, Big Intern (billboard slogan: "Snorting . . . Coupling . . . Auscultating"; theme tune: Robert Palmer, "Bad Case of Loving You").
Alcohol and substance misuse are often defined as levels of consumption
greater than those of one's doctor. By this measure the
neuropsychopharmacology practicum stands ready to reduce prevalence of
these disorders at a stroke.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Rabelais F. Gargantua and Pantagruel. London: Penguin, 1955. (Translated by J M Cohen. Originally published 1532-51.) |
| 2. |
Hogan DB.
Did Osler suffer from "paranoia antitherapeuticum baltimorensis"? A comparative content analysis of the Principles and Practice of Medicine and Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine.
CMAJ
1999;
161:
842-845 |
| 3. | Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1998. |
| 4. |
Isaacs D, Fitzgerald D.
Seven alternatives to evidence based medicine.
BMJ
1999;
319:
1618 |
| 5. |
Angell M.
The pharmaceutical industry to whom is it accountable?
N Engl J Med
2000;
342:
1902 |
| 6. |
Bodenheimer T.
Uneasy alliance clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry.
N Engl J Med
2000;
342:
1539 |
| 7. | No Free Lunch. Required reading. www.nofreelunch.org (accessed 28 Oct 2001). |
| 8. |
Smith R.
The war on drugs.
BMJ
1995;
311:
1655-1656 |
| 9. | Freud S. Über Coca. Vienna: Verlag von Moritz Perles, 1885. |
| 10. |
Rutkow IM.
Moments in surgical history: William Stewart Halsted.
Arch Surg
2000;
135:
1478 |
| 11. | Osmond H. A review of the clinical effects of psychotomimetic agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1957; 66: 418-434. |
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+