Beyond science?
Effects of remote, retroactive intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients with bloodstream infection: randomised controlled trial
Leonard Leibovici Department of
Medicine, Beilinson Campus, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tiqva 49100, Israel leibovic{at}post.tau.ac.il
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
Objective:
To determine whether remote, retroactive
intercessory prayer, said for a group of patients with a bloodstream
infection, has an effect on outcomes.
Design:
Double blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial of a retroactive intervention.
Setting:
University hospital.
Subjects:
All 3393 adult patients whose
bloodstream infection was detected at the hospital in 1990-6.
Intervention:
In July 2000 patients were randomised to
a control group and an intervention group. A remote, retroactive intercessory prayer was said for the well being and full recovery of
the intervention group.
Main outcome measures:
Mortality in hospital,
length of stay in hospital, and duration of fever.
Results:
Mortality was 28.1% (475/1691) in the
intervention group and 30.2% (514/1702) in the control group (P for
difference=0.4). Length of stay in hospital and duration of fever were
significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the control
group (P=0.01 and P=0.04, respectively).
Conclusions:
Remote, retroactive intercessory
prayer said for a group is associated with a shorter stay in hospital
and shorter duration of fever in patients with a bloodstream infection and should be considered for use in clinical practice.
|
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
Two randomised controlled trials tested the effect of remote intercessory prayer (praying for persons unknown) on outcomes in patients admitted to an intensive coronary care unit. 1 2 Both studies showed a beneficial effect. A recent systematic review of the efficacy of distant healing concluded that "approximately 57% (13 of 23) of the randomised, placebo-controlled trials of distant healing . . . showed a positive treatment effect" and that "the evidence thus far warrants further study."3
The purpose of the present study was to extend these observations to patients with another severe disorder, bloodstream infection. As we cannot assume a priori that time is linear, as we perceive it,4 or that God is limited by a linear time, as we are,5 the intervention was carried out 4-10 years after the patients' infection and hospitalisation. The hypothesis was that remote, retroactive intercessory prayer reduces mortality and shortens the length of stay in hospital and duration of fever.
|
and time moves on
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
All adult patients whose bloodstream infection was detected at a university hospital (Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus) in Israel during 1990-6 were included in the study. Bloodstream infection was defined as a positive blood culture (not resulting from contamination) in the presence of sepsis.
In July 2000 a random number generator (Proc Uniform, SAS, Cary, NC, USA) was used to randomise the patients into two groups. A coin was tossed to designate the intervention group. A list of the first names of the patients in the intervention group was given to a person who said a short prayer for the well being and full recovery of the group as a whole. There was no sham intervention.
Three primary outcomes were compared: the number of deaths in hospital, length of stay in hospital from the day of the first positive blood culture to discharge or death, and duration of fever. Patients were defined as having fever on a specific day if one of three temperature measurements taken on that day showed a temperature of >37.5°C.
The 
2 test was used to test for the significance of
the results shown in the tables. As most of the continuous variables
did not have a normal distribution, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used
for comparisons.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
Of 3393 patients with a bloodstream infection, 1691 patients were randomised to the intervention group and 1702 to the control group. No patients were lost to follow up. The groups were similar with regard to the main risk factors for death (table 1).
|
Mortality was 28.1% (475/1691) in the intervention group and 30.2% (514/1702) in the control group (P for difference=0.4). The length of stay in hospital and duration of fever were significantly shorter in the intervention group (P=0.01 and P=0.04, respectively) (table 2).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
Remote, retroactive intercessory prayer was associated with a shorter stay in hospital and a shorter duration of fever in patients with a bloodstream infection. Mortality was lower in the intervention group, but the difference between the groups was not significant. A larger study might have shown a significant reduction in mortality.
The similarity in the risk factors in the two groups showed that the randomisation and allocation concealment were good. The very design of the study assured perfect blinding to patients and medical staff of allocation of patients and even the existence of the trial. Regrettably, the very same design meant that it was not possible to obtain the informed consent of the patients.
No mechanism known today can account for the effects of remote, retroactive intercessory prayer said for a group of patients with a bloodstream infection. However, the significant results and the flawless design prove that an effect was achieved. To quote Harris et al: "when James Lind, by clinical trial, determined that lemons and limes cured scurvy aboard the HMS Salisbury in 1753, he not only did not know about ascorbic acid, he did not even understand the concept of a `nutrient.' There was a natural explanation for his findings that would be clarified centuries later, but his inability to articulate it did not invalidate his observations."1
Conclusion
Remote, retroactive intercessory prayer can improve outcomes in
patients with a bloodstream infection. This intervention is cost
effective, probably has no adverse effects, and should be considered
for clinical practice. Further studies may determine the most effective
form of this intervention and its effect in other severe conditions and
may clarify its mechanism.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: LL planned and performed the study and is the guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
| 1. |
Harris WS, Gowda M, Kolb JW, Strychacz CP, Vacek JL, Jones PG, et al.
A randomized, controlled trial of the effects of remote, intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients admitted to the coronary care unit.
Arch Intern Med
1999;
159:
2273-2278 |
| 2. | Byrd RC. Positive therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer in a coronary care unit population. South Med J 1988; 81: 826-829[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Astin JA, Harkness E, Ernst E MD.
The efficacy of "distant healing": a systematic review of randomized trials.
Ann Intern Med
2000;
132:
903-910 |
| 4. | Landsberg PT, Vickers J. Thermodynamics: conflicting arrows of time. Nature 2000; 403: 609[CrossRef]. |
| 5. | Borges JL. A new refutation of time. In: Labyrinths. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970. |
|
© BMJ 2001
Related Articles
- Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer
- Andrew M Thornett, Shehan Hettiaratchy, Carolyn Hemsley, John Hopkins, Michael J Brownnutt, Christopher I Price, Max Lagnado, Stephan A Schwartz, Stephen L Black, and Leonard Leibovici
BMJ 2002 324: 1037.[Extract] [Full Text]
-
The BMJ takes reason's last step
BMJ 2001 323: 0.[Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hodge, D. R.
(2007). A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literature on Intercessory Prayer. Research on Social Work Practice
17: 174-187
[Abstract] -
Nordstrom, C.-H.
(2006). RE: "EXPOSURE TO LOUD NOISE AND RISK OF ACOUSTIC NEUROMA". Am J Epidemiol
164: 706-706
[Full text] -
Sylvestre, M.-P., Huszti, E., Hanley, J. A.
(2006). Do OSCAR winners live longer than less successful peers? A reanalysis of the evidence.. ANN INTERN MED
145: 361-363
[Abstract] [Full text] -
Turner, D D
(2006). Just another drug? A philosophical assessment of randomised controlled studies on intercessory prayer.. J. Med. Ethics
32: 487-490
[Abstract] [Full text] -
Bell, R. A., Suerken, C., Quandt, S. A., Grzywacz, J. G., Lang, W., Arcury, T. A.
(2005). Prayer for Health Among U.S. Adults: The 2002 National Health Interview Survey. Complementary Health Practice Review
10: 175-188
[Abstract] -
Bishop, J. P, Stenger, V. J
(2004). Retroactive prayer: lots of history, not much mystery, and no science. BMJ
329: 1444-1446
[Full text] -
Hunink, M G M.
(2004). Does evidence based medicine do more good than harm?. BMJ
329: 1051-1051
[Full text] -
Olshansky, B., Dossey, L.
(2003). Retroactive prayer: a preposterous hypothesis?. BMJ
327: 1465-1468
[Full text] -
Thornett, A. M, Hettiaratchy, S., Hemsley, C., Hopkins, J., Brownnutt, M. J, Price, C. I, Lagnado, M., Schwartz, S. A, Black, S. L, Leibovici, L.
(2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer. BMJ
324: 1037-1037
[Full text] -
(2002). Start Praying Now to Reduce Last Year's Hospital Stay!. JWatch Emergency Med.
2002: 11-11
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- A cautious approach is needed for the power of prayer
- Andrew M Thornett
bmj.com, 21 Dec 2001 [Full text] - So there is a God?!
- Michael Gdalevich
bmj.com, 21 Dec 2001 [Full text] - A nonsense joke for the New Year
- Yair Yodfat
bmj.com, 21 Dec 2001 [Full text] - There are thousands of suns in the sky above the clouds
- Sergio Stagnaro
bmj.com, 21 Dec 2001 [Full text] - You cannae break the laws of physics captain
- John Hopkins
bmj.com, 21 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Treat the control group
- Martin Bland
bmj.com, 22 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Evidence for Providence Based Medicine
- Arthur Leibovitz
bmj.com, 22 Dec 2001 [Full text] - The power of statistics, not prayer
- Shehan Hettiaratchy, et al.
bmj.com, 22 Dec 2001 [Full text] - I suggest to cross-over the study groups
- Francesco Falaschi
bmj.com, 22 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Occam's razor
- j martin dace
bmj.com, 23 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Irony doesn't travel well
- Michael Foley
bmj.com, 23 Dec 2001 [Full text] - A CHRISTMAS NIGHTMARE: AN UNETHICAL STUDY APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE BMJ
- Eugenio Pucci
bmj.com, 24 Dec 2001 [Full text] - TWO POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS TO THE RETROACTIVE INTERCESSORY PRAYER EFFECT
- Luis C. Silva
bmj.com, 24 Dec 2001 [Full text] - An example of synchronicity?
- Ian T Guy
bmj.com, 24 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Re: Treat the control group
- Ian Spencer
bmj.com, 24 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Science and Statistics cannot explain how prayer works
- Daniel O. Selo-Ojeme
bmj.com, 26 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Confounding effects of future prayer?
- Prisca M Middlemiss, et al.
bmj.com, 27 Dec 2001 [Full text] - On behalf of the "Less Sophisticated" general public
- Margaret M. Zacny
bmj.com, 28 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Improbable Research
- Eberhard W Lisse
bmj.com, 28 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Prayer Study Design
- Ronald L. Fredrickson
bmj.com, 28 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Hobgoblins of Consistency
- Doug Oman, et al.
bmj.com, 29 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Delay in publication?
- Anthony H.C. Campbell
bmj.com, 30 Dec 2001 [Full text] - All RCT require informed consent
- Christopher I. Price
bmj.com, 30 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Re: Treat the control group
- Haim Shapiro
bmj.com, 31 Dec 2001 [Full text] - The RCT - gold standard or golden calf?
- Robert G. Newcombe
bmj.com, 31 Dec 2001 [Full text] - Leibovici's paper is religious propaganda, not science
- Riccardo Baschetti
bmj.com, 1 Jan 2002 [Full text] - The effects of retroactive prayer: more questions than answers
- Max Lagnado
bmj.com, 1 Jan 2002 [Full text] - The Finger of God
- Stephen L. Black
bmj.com, 2 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Doctors prayer for more care
- DE Barnes
bmj.com, 3 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Misapprehension of principle
- Stephan A. Schwartz
bmj.com, 3 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Beyond Science?
- Tobit S Emmens
bmj.com, 3 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Efficacy of prayer underestimated?
- Charles S. Harris, PhD
bmj.com, 3 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Retroactive prayer - a solution to the bed crisis?
- Adrian Fawcett
bmj.com, 4 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Methodological concerns
- William G. Taylor
bmj.com, 6 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Pride and Prejudice, or Prayer?
- Max Lagnado
bmj.com, 6 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Time Paradox
- Effi Peled
bmj.com, 8 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Healing powers of the human mind
- Joseph Watine
bmj.com, 8 Jan 2002 [Full text] - I pray now for my own papers to be published
- Luc-Marie JOLY
bmj.com, 11 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Editors beware, everything is possible
- Yakov Sivan
bmj.com, 12 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Re: You cannae break the laws of physics captain
- Michael J Brownnutt
bmj.com, 15 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Re: Treat the control group
- Tracey A Thomas-Falconar, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Re: So there is a God?!
- Tracey A Thomas-Falconar, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Feb 2002 [Full text] - Down to earth
- Santiago V Rosales
bmj.com, 15 Jan 2002 [Full text] - A moment of seriousness
- Dr Trevor Watts
bmj.com, 16 Jan 2002 [Full text] - To whom did the prayer pray ?
- Tomoyuki Hisa
bmj.com, 19 Jan 2002 [Full text] - God and Us
- Gabriel Onato, MD, PhD
bmj.com, 23 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Blind faith in the Central Limit Theorem
- Robert J. MacG. Dawson
bmj.com, 25 Jan 2002 [Full text] - Therapeutic event or medical fact?
- Peter Morrell
bmj.com, 25 Jan 2002 [Full text] - A Question From An Outsider Looking In
- Alina Finn
bmj.com, 9 Feb 2002 [Full text] - Regarding retroactive prayer
- Gilbert J Custer, M.D.
bmj.com, 13 Feb 2002 [Full text] - Religion and Science
- Peter Morrell
bmj.com, 17 Feb 2002 [Full text] - God Listens
- William D. Misner Ph.D.
bmj.com, 23 Feb 2002 [Full text] - Do the statistics add up?
- Joseph T. Springer
bmj.com, 23 Feb 2002 [Full text] - Randomised trials cannot be used in this way
- Peter J Lachmann
bmj.com, 5 Mar 2002 [Full text] - Rule of thumb
- Gary S. Hurd, Ph. D.
bmj.com, 5 Mar 2002 [Full text] - Author's comments
- Leonard Leibovici
bmj.com, 12 Mar 2002 [Full text] - Thought experiment
- Timothy S. Roth, et al.
bmj.com, 14 Apr 2002 [Full text] - which gods ?
- Joan S Brodie
bmj.com, 29 Apr 2002 [Full text] - Re: Leibovici's paper is religious propaganda, not science
- Michael A. Reeves-McMillan
bmj.com, 1 Nov 2002 [Full text] - Re: The power of statistics, not prayer
- Elliott Middleton
bmj.com, 2 Nov 2002 [Full text] - Re: Religion and Science
- Reginald.H. Le Sueur
bmj.com, 20 Jun 2003 [Full text] - Re: A Question From An Outsider Looking In
- Reginald Le Sueur
bmj.com, 29 Jun 2003 [Full text] - Re: Re: Leibovici's paper is religious propaganda, not science
- Reginald Henry Le Sueur
bmj.com, 1 Jul 2003 [Full text] - Leibovici's paper is perfectly valid
- Matthew H Lewis
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2003 [Full text] - more propaganda, not science
- L S Lerwis
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2003 [Full text] - My manager is going to love this ...
- Dr. Matthew L Grove
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2003 [Full text] - Re: more propaganda, not science
- Reginald Henry Le Sueur
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2003 [Full text] - Re: Re: more propaganda, not science
- M C Feliciello
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2003 [Full text] - Re: Re: more propaganda, not science
- L S Lewis
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2003 [Full text] - Re: Re: Re: more propaganda, not science
- Reginald Henry Le Sueur
bmj.com, 4 Jul 2003 [Full text] - Re: Re: more propaganda, not science
- Matthew H Lewis
bmj.com, 4 Jul 2003 [Full text] - Re: Re: Re: more propaganda, not science
- Reginald H. Le Sueur
bmj.com, 5 Jul 2003 [Full text] - Re: Misapprehension of principle
- Reginald H. Le Sueur
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2003 [Full text] - Some Logical and Philosophical Objections and a Parallelism to the Newcomb Problem
- Deepak N Rama, et al.
bmj.com, 6 Dec 2003 [Full text] - Re: Some Logical and Philosophical Objections and a Parallelism to the Newcomb Problem
- Reginald.H. Le Sueur
bmj.com, 9 Dec 2003 [Full text] - Is the power of thought able to create successively older forms of the entire universe once every 10 to the minus 43 of a second?
- Richard G Fiddian-Green
bmj.com, 27 Dec 2003 [Full text] - RE: Some Logical and Philosophical Objections and a Parallelism to the Newcomb Problem
- Haralabos Gouzinis
bmj.com, 29 Jan 2004 [Full text] - RE: Some Logical and Philosophical Objections and a Parallelism to the Newcomb Problem
- Richard G Fiddian-Green
bmj.com, 1 Feb 2004 [Full text] - Effect of Remote, retroactive intercessory prayer on outcome in trauma patients
- Adam Starr, et al.
bmj.com, 23 Jun 2004 [Full text] - Re: Effect of Remote, retroactive intercessory prayer on outcome in trauma patients
- Howard Mann
bmj.com, 24 Jun 2004 [Full text] - Re: Effect of Remote, retroactive intercessory prayer on outcome in trauma patients
- Reginald.H. Le Sueur
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2004 [Full text] - Re: which gods ?
- Reginald.H. Le Sueur
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2004 [Full text] - Leibovici's paper is not "flawless"
- Sergio D Schvartzman
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2004 [Full text] - The Hospital Called Earth
- Michael A. Bedar
bmj.com, 13 Apr 2005 [Full text] - a test for the "scientific" community
- Martin Ploederl
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2005 [Full text] - Data
- Paulo Hubert
bmj.com, 28 Dec 2006 [Full text]
This article
-
Abstract
- Respond to this article
- Read responses to this article
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when responses are posted
- Alert me when a correction is posted
- View citation map
Services
- Email this article to a friend
- Find similar articles in BMJ
- Find similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Related content
Tools
Services
Rapid responses for this article
Most read last month
Student BMJ
Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+
