Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
James D Sargent a Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Medical
School, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA, b Department of Anesthesia, Dartmouth
Medical School, c Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical
School, d Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth
College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA Correspondence to: J D Sargent
James.D.Sargent{at}Hitchcock.org
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To test the hypothesis that greater
exposure to smoking in films is associated with trying smoking among adolescents.
Design:
Cross sectional survey of 4919 schoolchildren aged 9-15 years, and assessment of occurrence of smoking
in 601 films.
Setting:
Randomly selected middle schools in
Vermont and New Hampshire, USA.
Main outcome measure:
Number of schoolchildren
who had ever tried smoking a cigarette.
Results:
The films contained a median of 5 (interquartile range 1-12) occurrences of smoking. The typical
adolescent had seen 17 of 50 films listed. Exposure to smoking in films
varied widely: median 91 (49-152) occurrences. The prevalence of ever trying smoking increased with higher categories of exposure: 4.9% among students who saw 0-50 occurrences of smoking, 13.7% for 51-100 occurrences, 22.1% for 101-150, and 31.3% for >150. The association
remained significant after adjustment for age; sex; school performance;
school; parents' education; smoking by friend, sibling, or parent; and
receptivity to tobacco promotions. The adjusted odds ratios of ever
trying smoking for students in the higher categories of exposure,
compared with students exposed to 0-50 occurrences of smoking in films,
were 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.4), 2.4 (1.7 to 3.4), and
2.7 (2.0 to 3.8). These odds ratios were not substantially affected by
adjustment for parenting style or for personality traits of the adolescent.
Conclusion:
In this sample of adolescents there
was a strong, direct, and independent association between seeing
tobacco use in films and trying cigarettes, a finding that supports the hypothesis that smoking in films has a role in the initiation of
smoking in adolescents.
|
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adolescents start smoking in response to social influences, emulating the behaviour of friends, family members, and other people they admire.1 The influence of smoking by friends and family members has been extensively studied, but less attention has been given to influences of the media other than tobacco advertising. Yet the typical adolescent spends 2-3 hours per day watching television and films.2-4
Movie channels and home videos have greatly increased children's access to films.3-5 A recent survey found that American adolescents watch an average of three films a week (150 a year).2 Although cigarette smoking is infrequent on primetime television,6 it is depicted in almost all films.7-10 Adolescents see film stars smoking in the context of sexuality (Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct), toughness (John Travolta in Broken Arrow), romance (Charlie Sheen in The Chase), and adolescent rebellion (Leonardo DiCaprio in Romeo and Juliet) and as a way to relieve stress (Winona Ryder in Girl Interrupted).11 Not surprisingly, smoking by adolescents' favourite film stars has been linked with smoking among adolescents. 12 13
The movie industry has been criticised for its depictions of smoking on
screen,9-16 but industry representatives are typically sceptical that viewing smoking influences behaviour.17
Refuting this response has been difficult because no studies have
empirically tested the hypothesis that exposure to tobacco use in films
is associated with smoking in adolescents. To inform this debate we
carried out a cross sectional survey to evaluate young adolescents' exposure to smoking in films and its association with having tried cigarettes. The study was approved by the human subjects committee at Dartmouth College.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recruitment of sample
We sent letters to 30 randomly
selected middle schools in New Hampshire and Vermont with at least 150 students (fig 1). Half the schools agreed to participate. The socioeconomic profiles of participating and non-participating schools
did not differ. About half (52%) of the schools were in rural
communities of less than 10 000 residents. In September 1999 proctors
administered the confidential survey during class time (parents were
informed by mail beforehand). The average participation by school was
92.5%; 128 (2.1%) parents or students refused participation, and 380 (6.3%) students were absent. We excluded 571 surveys for missing
(n=565) or inconsistent (n=15) responses. Excluded students were likely
to be younger (for example, fifth grade), to report poorer school
performance, and to have seen fewer films than those with usable
surveys, but smoking behaviour did not differ between included and
excluded students.
|
Exposure to smoking in films
Figure 2 illustrates our
procedure for determining exposure to smoking in films. We counted
occurrences of smoking in each of 601 popular contemporary films. We
estimated exposure to these films by asking respondents whether they
had seen 50 films randomly selected from the larger pool. On the basis of the films that adolescents reported seeing, we calculated the number
of occurrences of smoking seen by each survey
respondent.
|
Primary outcome
We determined whether students had ever
tried smoking by asking the question "How many cigarettes have you smoked in your life?" We categorised a response of none as "never smoked" and all other responses (just a few puffs, 1-19 cigarettes, 20-100 cigarettes, >100 cigarettes) as "tried smoking."
Potential confounders
We measured the following categories
of factors that might be associated with trying smoking:
sociodemographic characteristics (for example, school, age, sex,
parents' education), social influences (parent smoking, sibling
smoking, friend smoking, receptivity to tobacco
promotions18-19), and other characteristics of the
child and family (self reported school performance, propensity to
sensation seeking,20-21 rebelliousness,22
self esteem,23 two measures of authoritative
parenting,24 and students' perception of parental
disapproval of smoking). We measured reliability by using Cronbach's
.25 Table 1 lists the questions used in the survey to
assess these variables, with their reliability.
|
Validity of responses to film questions
To evaluate the
validity of adolescents' recollection of films they had seen, we
re-contacted 49 adolescents who had participated in a longitudinal
study in which they reported each month the films they had seen in the past week. Adolescents had excellent recognition of the films they
reported seeing during the previous year, identifying films correctly
88% of the time. In addition, the adolescents rarely reported seeing
false film titles with false actors (3.0%) or false film titles with
real actors (2.7%).
Statistical analysis
We used the
2 test
or analysis of variance to evaluate the association between trying
smoking and each of the confounding variables. We used logistic
regression to determine the crude odds ratios, adjusted odds ratios,
and 95% confidence intervals. Firstly, we used a crude model in which
exposure to smoking in films was entered as four categories that
corresponded to fourths of exposure in the student population. Next, we
added controls for sociodemographic characteristics only. Then we added social influence variables, and finally we added other characteristics of the child and family. Age and indexed variables (sensation seeking,
rebelliousness, self esteem, and the authoritative parenting measures)
were entered as continuous variables. We did not include the number of
R rated (restricted) films seen as a covariate because of its high
correlation with occurrences of tobacco use (r=0.89). All
tests were considered significant at the 0.05 level.
Sensitivity analysis
We conducted a sensitivity analysis to
determine whether an unmeasured confounder could explain our
results.26 We considered the effect of adding a missing
confounder (independent of other covariates) on the relation between
seeing tobacco use in films and smoking in adolescents. The results of
this analysis indicate how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have
to be associated with exposure and outcome in order to lead to false reporting of an association.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Characteristics of the sample
The ages of the 4919 adolescents ranged from 9 to 15 years. Younger adolescents were
under-represented because some schools did not include grade 5 (table
2). The students were primarily white, and most reported that their
parents had completed high school. Thirty nine per cent had at least
one parent who smoked, and 37% had friends who smoked. Overall, 17.5%
of adolescents had tried smoking, and trying smoking was significantly associated with all the variables in table 2 (all
P
0.01).
|
Smoking in films
The 601 films included 23 films rated G,
120 rated PG, 186 rated PG-13, and 272 rated R (see fig 2 for
explanation of ratings). The number of occurrences of smoking increased
by rating, with medians of 1 in films rated G, 3 in films rated PG, 4 in films rated PG-13, and 8.5 in films rated R. The difference was
significant only for R rated films (only two of these films contained
no smoking).7 Only 10% of films rated PG or PG-13 contained no smoking.
Exposure to smoking in films
On average, adolescents had
seen 17 of the 50 films on their list, which translated to a median "exposure" of 91 occurrences of smoking (interquartile range
49-152). Exposure to smoking in films was strongly and significantly
associated with all of the risk factors for smoking (all P<0.001).
Exposure increased with age and was higher for boys (boys averaged 126 (SD 88) occurrences of smoking v 95 (72) for girls;
P<0.0001). Students with poorer school performance had higher exposure
to smoking in films, as did those with higher levels of sensation seeking and rebelliousness.
Association between exposure to tobacco use and trying
smoking
The cut-off values used to group exposure to smoking in
films for further analysis were 0-50 occurrences (26.4% of the student sample), 51-100 (28.7%), 101-150 (19.5%), and >150 (25.4%). Table 2
shows that the proportion of adolescents who had tried smoking increased with higher categories of exposure to tobacco use in films.
As illustrated in figure 3, this association was independent of age
(test for trend P<0.0001 for each age group). For example, 9-11 year
olds in the highest category of exposure to movie tobacco use had the
same prevalence of trying smoking as 14-15 year olds in the lowest
exposure category.
|
Multivariate association
Adolescents with higher exposure
to tobacco use in films had a significantly higher odds of trying smoking (table 3). Although adjustment for sociodemographic factors and
social influences weakened these associations, the odds ratios were
unchanged when other characteristics were added, suggesting very little
confounding by personality and parenting characteristics. Our final
model included all covariates; those that had a significant association
with trying smoking included age; parents' education; school; smoking
by friends, siblings, or parents; school performance; sensation
seeking; rebelliousness; and receptivity to tobacco promotions. The
effect of moving to a higher category of exposure to movie smoking was
similar to the effect of having parents who smoke (odds ratio 1.5) or
siblings who smoke (1.9). The results did not change when exposure to
smoking in films was entered as a continuous or log transformed
variable. The association between seeing smoking in films and trying
smoking was significantly weaker for adolescents whose parents
smoked.
|
Sensitivity analysis
An unmeasured covariate would be
unlikely to change our findings. With a dichotomous film variable
(below median exposure v above median exposure), the product
of the odds ratio for the association between an unmeasured covariate
and smoking in films with the odds ratio for the unmeasured covariate and adolescent smoking would have to be
22 to invalidate our results. For the strongest measured confounder (friend smoking) this
product was 11.2, making such an important unmeasured covariate very unlikely.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We found a strong, direct, independent association between higher exposure to tobacco use in films and smoking in adolescents. The magnitude of the association suggests that influence from films is as strong as other kinds of social influence, such as smoking by a parent or sibling. These results extend the findings of cross sectional studies showing that adolescents whose favourite film stars smoke are more likely to smoke themselves 12 13 and those of a study that showed that seeing smoking in just one film may affect attitudes to smoking.27
Exposure to tobacco use
Among these adolescents the exposure to smoking in films was
high
almost half of the students had seen 100 or more depictions of
tobacco use in the films on their list. Yet this represents only a
small portion of the films these adolescents have seen. Many had seen
films that were released when they were infants (for example, half of
the 460 students asked about the 1988 movie Die Hard had
seen it), which shows how home viewing of videotapes has expanded film
options for adolescents. A typical adolescent watching 150 films a year
will be exposed to about 800 depictions of smoking. Given this high
level of exposure to films, the typical adolescent could see more
smoking in films than in the real world. In addition, movie tobacco use
has greater relevance to adolescents than smoking in the real world.
Adolescents whose parents smoke were less responsive to the influence
of films, possibly because seeing their parents smoking gave them a
more reality based perception of cigarette smoking.
Limitations of the study
Exposure to smoking in films is highly correlated with watching
adult movies (R rated films). Children more likely to see R rated films
may be more likely to smoke, regardless of exposure to smoking in
films. This is unlikely to explain our finding, as controlling for
personality traits such as sensation seeking and for parenting factors
had little effect on our findings. Another possibility is that other
aspects of R rated films (besides the tobacco content) are associated
with smoking. The occurrence of smoking in R rated films is so common
that it may not be possible to separate out the independent effects of
tobacco use (almost all R rated films distributed over the past decade
contain smoking).7 None the less, we believe that the most
theoretically reasonable explanation for the association is exposure to
smoking in films.
the results are the first
step towards determining causation.
Conclusions
We developed a survey method that allowed us to obtain population
based estimates of exposure to smoking in films and tested it in a
sample of rural American adolescents. The results indicate that
exposure to tobacco use in films is pervasive. More importantly, such
exposure is associated with trying smoking, which supports the
hypothesis that films have a role in the initiation of smoking.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dan Nassau and Ezra Hays for coding the films, Susan Martin for her assistance in conducting the surveys and preparing the manuscript, and Lisa Schwartz and Steve Woloshin for their editorial comments.
Contributors: JDS developed the idea for the study, led the investigative team, and is primary author of the paper. MLB had the idea for the survey method and directed the statistical analysis. MAD provided critical input for all aspects of the study and was responsible for survey development and data management. LAM developed the presentation of the data and conducted the analysis. MBA developed the personality trait and parenting measures, carried out the survey work, and directed data entry. TFH developed the behaviour theory underlying the study and supervised the analysis of movie content. JJT managed the content analysis and gave careful thought to measurement of tobacco use exposure. The paper was written jointly by all authors. JDS will act guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: National Cancer Institute grant CA-77026.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Lynch B, Bonnie R.
Growing up tobacco free preventing nicotine addiction in children and youths. A report of the Institute of Medicine.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994.
|
| 2. | Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF, Brodie M. Kids and media at the new millennium: a comprehensive national analysis of children's media use. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation, 1999. |
| 3. | Strasburger VC, Donnerstein E. Children, adolescents, and the media in the 21st century. Adolesc Med 2000; 11: 51-68[Medline]. |
| 4. | Roberts DF. Media and youth: access, exposure, and privatization. J Adolesc Health 2000; 27(suppl): 8-14[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Krugman DM, Sharp SA, Johnson KF. Video movies at home: are they viewed like film or like television? Journalism Quarterly 1991; 68: 1-2. |
| 6. | Christenson PG, Henriksen L, Roberts DF. Substance use in popular prime-time television. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2000. |
| 7. | Dalton MA, Tickle JJ, Sargent JD, Beach M, Ahrens B, Heatherton TF. The incidence and context of tobacco use in popular movies from 1988-1997. Prev Med (in press). |
| 8. | Roberts DF, Henriksen L, Christenson PG. Substance use in popular movies and music. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1999. |
| 9. |
Russo Hazan A, Levens Lipton H, Glantz SA.
Popular films do not reflect current tobacco use.
Am J Public Health
1994;
84:
998-1000 |
| 10. | Everett SA, Schnuth RL, Tribble JL. Tobacco and alcohol use in top-grossing American films. J Community Health 1998; 23: 317-324[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | McCool JP, Cameron LD, Petrie KJ. Adolescent perceptions of smoking imagery in film. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 1577-1587. |
| 12. | Distefan JM, Gilpin E, Sargent JD, Pierce JP. Do movie stars encourage adolescents to start smoking? Evidence from California. Prev Med 1999; 28: 1-11[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Tickle JJ, Sargent JD, Dalton MA, Beach ML, Heatherton T.
Favourite movie stars, their tobacco use in contemporary movies and its association with adolescent smoking.
Tob Control
2001;
10:
16-22 |
| 14. | Chapman S, Davis RM. Smoking in movies: is it a problem? Tob Control 1997; 6: 269-271[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Goldstein AO, Sobel RA, Newman GR.
Tobacco and alcohol use in G-rated children's animated films.
JAMA
1999;
281:
1131-1136 |
| 16. | McIntosh WD, Bazzini DG, Smith SM, Wayne SM. Who smokes in Hollywood? Characteristics of smokers in popular films from 1940 to 1989. Addict Behav 1998; 23: 395-398[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. |
Shields DL, Carol J, Balbach ED, McGee S.
Hollywood on tobacco: how the entertainment industry understands tobacco portrayal.
Tob Control
1999;
8:
378-386 |
| 18. |
Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farlos AJ, Berry CC.
Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking.
JAMA
1998;
279:
511-515 |
| 19. | Sargent JD, Dalton M, Beach M, Bernhardt A, Heatherton T, Stevens M. Effect of cigarette promotions on smoking uptake among adolescents. Prev Med 2000; 30: 320-327[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Zuckerman M, Bone RN, Neary R, Mangelsdorff D, Brustman B. What is the sensation seeker? Personality trait and experience correlates of the sensation-seeking scales. J Consult Clin Psychol 1972; 39: 308-321[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Russo MF, Stokes GS, Lahey BB, Christ MA, McBurnett K, Loeber R, et al. A sensation seeking scale for children: further refinement and psychometric development. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 1993; 15: 69-85. |
| 22. | Pierce J, Farkas A, Evans N. Tobacco use in California 1992: a focus on preventing uptake in adolescents. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Human Services, 1993. |
| 23. | Carvajal SC, Wiatrek DE, Evans RI, Knee CR, Nash SG. Psychosocial determinants of the onset and escalation of smoking: cross-sectional and prospective findings in multiethnic middle school samples. J Adolescent Health 2000; 27: 255-265[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Jackson C, Henriksen L, Foshee VA. The authoritative parenting scale: predicting health risk behaviors among adolescents. Health Educ Behav 1998; 25: 319-337[Abstract]. |
| 25. | Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297-334[CrossRef]. |
| 26. | Lin DY, Psaty BM, Kronmal RA. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics 1998; 54: 948-963[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | Pechmann C, Shih CF. Smoking scenes in movies and antismoking advertisements before movies: effects on youth. J Marketing 1999; 63(3): 1-13. |
| 28. | Sargent JD, Tickle JJ, Beach ML, Dalton MA, Ahrens MB, Heatherton TF. Brand appearances in contemporary cinema films and contribution to global marketing of cigarettes. Lancet 2001; 357: 29-32[CrossRef][Medline]. |
(Accepted 29 August 2001)
Read all Rapid Responses