Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Henrik U Irgens Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Locus for Registry
Based Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Health
Care, University of Bergen, Haukeland Hospital, N5021 Bergen, Norway Correspondence to: L M Irgens lorentz.irgens{at}mfr.uib.no
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To assess whether mothers and fathers have a higher long term risk of death, particularly from cardiovascular disease and cancer, after the mother has had pre-eclampsia.
Design:
Population based cohort study of registry data.
Subjects:
Mothers and fathers of all 626 272
births that were the mothers' first deliveries, recorded in the
Norwegian medical birth registry from 1967 to 1992. Parents were
divided into two cohorts based on whether the mother had pre-eclampsia during the pregnancy. Subjects were also stratified by whether the
birth was term or preterm, given that pre-eclampsia might be more
severe in preterm pregnancies.
Main outcome measures:
Total mortality and
mortality from cardiovascular causes, cancer, and stroke from 1967 to
1992, from data from the Norwegian registry of causes of death.
Results:
Women who had pre-eclampsia had a
1.2-fold higher long term risk of death (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.37) than women who did not have pre-eclampsia. The risk in women with pre-eclampsia and a preterm delivery was 2.71-fold higher (1.99 to
3.68) than in women who did not have pre-eclampsia and whose
pregnancies went to term. In particular, the risk of death from
cardiovascular causes among women with pre-eclampsia and a preterm
delivery was 8.12-fold higher (4.31 to 15.33). However, these women had
a 0.36-fold (not significant) decreased risk of cancer. The long term
risk of death was no higher among the fathers of the pre-eclamptic
pregnancies than the fathers of pregnancies in which pre-eclampsia did
not occur.
Conclusions:
Genetic factors that increase the
risk of cardiovascular disease may also be linked to pre-eclampsia. A possible genetic contribution from fathers to the risk of pre-eclampsia was not reflected in increased risks of death from cardiovascular causes or cancer among fathers.
|
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pre-eclampsia, which is characterised by hypertension and proteinuria, occurs in 3-5% of pregnancies.1 The condition may be life threatening to the mother and the fetus if it is not properly managed, but it usually ends when the baby and placenta are delivered.2
The causes of pre-eclampsia are not well understood. A paradoxical preventive effect when the mother smokes has been established, even though the mechanism is unknown. 3 4 Maternal and fetal genes, including paternal genes expressed in the fetus, probably also play a part. 1 5 A high risk of recurrence of pre-eclampsia in subsequent pregnancies supports the role of an inherited susceptibility in the maternal genes. In a previous study in Norwegian women we reported a 12-fold increase in the risk of pre-eclampsia in a second pregnancy when the woman had had pre-eclampsia in the first pregnancy.6 A strong association of risks between sisters (odds ratio 2.2) and an increased occurrence of pre-eclampsia in daughters of mothers who had pre-eclampsia are further evidence of maternal genes for susceptibility. 6 7
Paternal genes transmitted to the fetus also seem to be involved in pre-eclampsia. Our earlier study found that the risk of women having pre-eclampsia in their second pregnancy after having had pre-eclampsia in the first pregnancy was 12-fold higher when the fathers were the same in both pregnancies, compared with eightfold higher when the father was different.6 Furthermore, the risk of pre-eclampsia in any pregnancy was 1.8-fold higher when the father had previously fathered a pre-eclamptic pregnancy in another woman.6 Similar results have been reported in a study in California.8
Long term survival of mothers was addressed in 1976 by Chesley et al, who found no increased mortality in white women who had eclampsia in their first pregnancy.9 In 1981 Fisher et al expressed the view that the long term prognosis of cardiovascular disease in women with pre-eclampsia does not differ from that in the general population.10 On the other hand, Roberts and Cooper recently proposed common risk factors for pre-eclampsia and atherosclerosis.1 The set of genes that expresses thrombophilia is a candidate for susceptibility to pre-eclampsia.11 Women with complications in pregnancy associated with intervillous or spiral artery thrombosis and inadequate placental perfusion and with pre-eclampsia have more mutations of these genes.12 Genetic thrombophilia may, however, also increase a mother's risk of cardiovascular disease later in life. Specific fetal or paternal candidate genes have so far not been identified.
We followed up mothers and fathers of pre-eclamptic pregnancies to
assess whether their risks of death from specific types of disease were
higher than in parents of pregnancies without pre-eclampsia. Any such
risk would shed light on factors involved in pre-eclampsia. Increased
risk may, however, be associated with the secondary effects of
pre-eclampsia. The evidence is increasing that mothers' exposure to
hormones during pregnancy,13-15 particularly when the
women have pre-eclampsia,16 affects their long term risk
of having cancer. In our study we firstly compared the estimated total
mortality of mothers and fathers of pre-eclamptic pregnancies with that
of mothers and fathers of normal pregnancies. We then separately
compared mortality from cardiovascular disease and from cancer in the
same groups.
| |
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data on the cohorts were derived from the medical birth registry of Norway, which comprises all births in Norway since 1967 with more than 16 weeks of gestation (about 60 000 births a year), and from the registry of causes of death. Midwives and doctors must notify the birth registry of a range of personal and medical data.17 National identification numbers of child and mother are recorded for all births. The father's identification number is usually recorded but was missing in 13.9% of records of first births.
Most diagnoses of pre-eclampsia are notified as such to the medical birth registry. The notification form may also hold information on specific symptoms of pre-eclampsia, such as hypertension induced by pregnancy, proteinuria, and oedema. We defined cases of pre-eclampsia as all pregnancies with a specified diagnosis of pre-eclampsia and all pregnancies in which both hypertension induced by pregnancy and proteinuria were recorded. Birth weight was notified in 99% of birth records. Gestational age, based on the last menstruation, was recorded in more than 90% of births.
Mothers and fathers were divided into two groups according to whether the mother had pre-eclampsia during the pregnancy that resulted in her first delivery. Severe pre-eclampsia is likely to result in a preterm birth (less than 37 weeks' gestation). To identify pregnancies with severe pre-eclampsia we also stratified the cohorts by whether the delivery was term or preterm.
Using national identification numbers we matched records of parents in the medical birth registry with data from the cause of death registry, which is based on death certificates and specifies up to four diagnosed causes of death. We identified a total of 626 272 mothers whose first delivery was registered between 1967 and 1992. Mortality in this cohort of mothers and in the cohort of 539 316 men who were registered as fathers of these births was followed through to 1992. The length of follow up ranged from 0 to 25 years (median 13 years). As well as total mortality, we looked at mortality from cardiovascular causes, cancer, and stroke.
We defined cardiovascular mortality as all deaths in which the cause was registered as being related to the heart. This included codes 410 to 429 of ICD-8 and ICD-9 (international classification of diseases, 8th and 9th revisions). Cancer mortality included all deaths corresponding to codes 140 to 239.
|
We estimated survival curves representing total mortality, using the
actuarial method, with censoring at the end of 1992. We used the log
rank test to test for difference in total mortality. We compared
mortality in mothers who had pre-eclampsia in their first pregnancy
with mortality in other mothers by using the Cox proportional hazards
model, adjusting for mother's age at delivery and year of birth of the
baby. Mortality in the fathers was analysed similarly. We also used Cox
models to compare mortality from specific causes. We used SPSS for
Windows 6.0 to analyse data.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Altogether 4350 deaths occurred among the 626 272 mothers whose first delivery was registered between 1967 and 1992 (6.9 deaths per 1000). The proportions among mothers who had term pregnancies with pre-eclampsia and mothers who had preterm pregnancies with pre-eclampsia were 6.6 and 15.5 per 1000, respectively (table 1). The reduced survival in mothers who had preterm pregnancies with pre-eclampsia was consistent throughout the 25 years of follow up (figure). Among mothers who had a term delivery, survival was not lower when pre-eclampsia occurred during the pregnancy. Among mothers who did not have pre-eclampsia, survival was moderately reduced after preterm deliveries. After adjustment for maternal age and year of birth of the baby, Cox model analysis (with mothers who did not have pre-eclampsia and who had a term delivery as the reference group) showed a 1.56-fold higher risk of death (95% confidence interval 1.38 to 1.76) in women who had a preterm delivery but no pre-eclampsia and a 2.71-fold higher mortality in women who had a preterm delivery and pre-eclampsia (table 2). No increase in mortality was seen in women who had pre-eclampsia but whose pregnancy went to term.
|
|
The increased risk of death among women who had pre-eclampsia and a preterm delivery was more marked among women who died from cardiovascular causes: the risk in this group was 8.12-fold higher (4.31 to 15.33) than that in the reference group (women who died from cardiovascular causes and who had term pregnancies without pre-eclampsia). For cardiovascular causes, an increased risk was also shown in mothers who had pre-eclampsia and a term delivery (1.65-fold; 1.01 to 2.70). The increase was 2.95-fold (2.12 to 4.11) after a pregnancy without pre-eclampsia but that ended in a preterm delivery. Similar but weaker results were seen in mothers who died from stroke (table 2).
For cancer mortality, the risk was decreased (0.36-fold) in women who had pre-eclampsia and a preterm delivery. Although this reduction was not significant, it contrasted with a significant increase in risk (1.32-fold; 1.10 to 1.58) in women who did not have pre-eclampsia but did have a preterm delivery.
Altogether 9284 deaths occurred among the fathers (17.1 per 1000)
(table 1). Whether the mother had pre-eclampsia had no significant
effect on the long term survival of the fathers (P for
difference=0.42). Overall mortality among the fathers was higher than
that in the mothers partly because the mean age of the fathers was
higher. No significantly increased risk of death from cardiovascular
causes was seen among men who had fathered a pregnancy in which
pre-eclampsia occurred. The reduction in cancer mortality (0.66-fold)
among fathers of pregnancies in which pre-eclampsia occurred and that
were preterm was less than that in mothers and was not significant.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings are consistent with but do not prove the hypothesis that the long term risk of death from cardiovascular causes is associated with a maternal genetic predisposition to pre-eclampsia. The association between mortality and pre-eclampsia may also reflect long term complications of the disease or a common effect of social or environmental conditions.
We found no evidence that a father's risk of death from cardiovascular causes was related to pre-eclampsia in the mother. Paternal genes in the fetus may increase the risk of pre-eclampsia in a particular pregnancy.6 Such genes are, however, probably not related to risk of cardiovascular disease.
A tendency of a reduced risk of death from cancer was seen in mothers who had pre-eclampsia. This is consistent with a lower prevalence of smoking among mothers who had pre-eclampsia. 3 4 A reduced risk of death from cancer among fathers of pregnancies in which pre-eclampsia occurred might be related to the mother and father having similar smoking patterns. A protective mechanism related to reduced levels of oestrogen in cases of pre-eclampsia is also consistent with a reduced risk of death from cancer among mothers.16 Interestingly, this contrasted with an increased risk of death from cancer in mothers whose first pregnancy was preterm but who did not have pre-eclampsia.
Misclassification of outcome might have occurred, in that cardiovascular and cancer causes of death could have been overlooked in the death certificate. However, such misclassification would not be differential and would not bias the relative risk.
The prevalence of pre-eclampsia in first pregnancies, as measured by our methods, concurs with the prevalence found in most other studies and indicates that our measure of pre-eclampsia was reliable and accurate. 1 18 19 We defined pre-eclampsia stringently by excluding pregnancies in which only hypertension induced by pregnancy or hypertension combined with oedema occurred and by including only mothers' first births.
Confounding might explain the strong association between pre-eclampsia and increased cardiovascular mortality in mothers. Smith et al found a negative association between weight at birth of babies and long term cardiovascular mortality of their mothers. 20 21 Thus, the association with pre-eclampsia might also be an effect of birth weight, or mechanisms related to birth weight.19 In our data pre-eclampsia had an independent effect on cardiovascular mortality, even after adjustment for birth weight (a 2.59-fold higher risk in mothers who had preterm births and pre-eclampsia; P=0.005). Adjustment for birth weight could be overadjustment, because reduced birth weight would be an effect and a marker of more severe pre-eclampsia. In any case, there is no reason to consider birth weight as a confounder. On the other hand, the existence of other factors causing both pre-eclampsia and increased mortality cannot be further elucidated.
That cardiovascular mortality in women who had preterm deliveries but no pre-eclampsia was higher than in women who had a term delivery and pre-eclampsia justifies further speculation. Underreporting of pre-eclampsia in preterm deliveries would bias the effect of preterm deliveries towards higher relative risks. Alternatively, increased cardiovascular mortality could be due to more than one factor: in pre-eclampsia it may be related to genetic thrombophilia, and in preterm deliveries it may be related to other factors (smoking, for example, even though it is not generally agreed that smoking and preterm deliveries are related22). Increased cancer mortality (as well as increased cardiovascular and stroke mortality) is consistent with such a hypothesis. Furthermore, if smoking masks the symptoms of pre-eclampsia, a special reason for underreporting would exist that would provide further evidence of the role of genetic thrombophilia.4
One important limitation of this study is the incomplete follow up
of the cohort. The maximum follow up was 26 years, and the median was
about 13 years. Although our results apply only to relatively young
women, the implications for prevention of pre-eclampsia and
determination of its causes may still be important. With longer follow
up the pattern of risks may become clearer but may also change. We
followed parents from the mother's first delivery, partly for
simplicity and partly because pre-eclampsia is more likely to occur in
a mother's first pregnancy.2 It is possible that the risk
of death in the long term changes with outcome in subsequent pregnancies.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: HUI and LR did initial analyses and drafted the paper, LMI edited the final version, and RTL did the final statistical analyses. All authors contributed to development of the key ideas of the paper and to interpretation of results.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Helse og Rehabilitering.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Roberts JM, Cooper DW. Pathogenesis and genetics of pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2001; 357: 53-56[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Higgins JR, de Swiet M. Blood-pressure measurement and classification in pregnancy. Lancet 2001; 357: 131-135[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Marcoux S, Brisson J, Fabia J.
The effect of cigarette smoking on the risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension.
Am J Epidemiol
1989;
130:
950-957 |
| 4. | Cnattingius S, Mills JL, Yuen J, Eriksson O, Salonen H. The paradoxical effect of smoking in preeclamptic pregnancies: smoking reduces the incidence but increases the rates of perinatal mortality, abruption placentae, and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 156-161[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Haig D. Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. Q Rev Biol 1993; 68: 495-532[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Lie RT, Rasmussen S, Brunborg H, Gjessing HK, Lie-Nielsen E, Irgens LM.
Fetal and maternal contributions to risk of pre-eclampsia: population based study.
BMJ
1998;
316:
1343-1347 |
| 7. | Mogren I, Høgberg U, Winkvist A, Stenlund H. Familial occurrence of pre-eclampsia. Epidemiology 1999; 10: 518-522[Medline]. |
| 8. |
Li DK, Wi S.
Changing paternity and the risk of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia in the subsequent pregnancy.
Am J Epidemiol
2000;
151:
57-62 |
| 9. | Chesley LC, Annitto JE, Cosgrove RA. The remote prognosis of eclamptic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 124: 446-459[Medline]. |
| 10. | Fisher KA, Luger A, Spargo BH, Lindheimer MD. Hypertension in pregnancy: clinical-pathological correlations and remote prognosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1981; 60: 267-276[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Kupferminc MJ, Eldor A, Steinman N, Many A, Bar-Am A, Jaffa A, et al.
Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy.
N Engl J Med
1999;
340:
9-13 |
| 12. | De Groot CJ, Bloemenkamp KW, Duvekot EJ, Helmerhorst FM, Bertina RM, Van Der Meer F, et al. Preeclampsia and genetic risk factors for thrombosis: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 975-980[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Tretli S, Kvåle G. Breast cancer incidence before age 55 in relation to parity and age at first and last births: a prospective study of one million Norwegian women. Epidemiology 1994; 5: 604-611[Medline]. |
| 14. | Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Kvåle G. The short-term and long-term effect of a pregnancy on breast cancer risk: a prospective study of 802 457 parous Norwegian women. Br J Cancer 1995; 72: 480-484[Medline]. |
| 15. | Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Kvåle G. Multiple births, sex of children and subsequent breast-cancer risk for the mothers: a prospective study in Norway. Int J Cancer 1995; 60: 341-344[Medline]. |
| 16. | Innes KE, Byers TE. Preeclampsia and breast cancer risk. Epidemiology 1999; 10: 722-732[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Irgens LM. The medical birth registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 435-439[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Births in Norway through 30 years. Bergen: Medical Birth Registry of Norway, 1997:1-57. |
| 19. | Lindheimer MD, Katz AI. Hypertension in pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 675-680[Medline]. |
| 20. |
Smith GD, Harding S, Rosato M.
Relation between infants' birth weight and mothers' mortality: prospective observational study.
BMJ
2000;
320:
839-840 |
| 21. | Smith GD, Whitley E, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Birth dimensions of offspring, premature birth, and the mortality of mothers. Lancet 2000; 356: 2066-2067[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Kyrklund-Blomberg NB, Cnattingius S. Preterm birth and maternal smoking: risks related to gestational age and onset of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 1051-1055[CrossRef][Medline]. |
(Accepted 10 July 2001)
James M Roberts Department of Obstetrics,
Gynaecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, USA
Correspondence
to: J M Roberts rsijmr{at}mail.magee.edu
Irgens and associates again use data from the Norwegian
birth registry to provide fascinating insights into pre-eclampsia. They
previously established that maternal and paternal genes are involved in
pre-eclampsia, and they now test the relation between pre-eclampsia and
later cardiovascular disease.1 They report that women with
pre-eclampsia who have a preterm delivery have an increased risk of
cardiovascular disease, whereas women with pre-eclampsia who deliver at
term have no increased risk. The paper has important implications, but
the generalisability of the findings must be considered carefully.
The authors provide considerable support for the idea that the onset of
pre-eclampsia early and late in pregnancy indicates different diseases.
Although this idea has long been the suspicion of clinicians caring for
women with pre-eclampsia, only recently has it been supported by
objective data. In a study of the relation between birth weight and
gestational age in infants, Xiong et al concluded that, compared with
births in general, infants were more likely to be underweight only in
pre-eclamptic pregnancies that delivered preterm The main limitation of this study is the generalisability of the data.
The authors support the hypothesis of a relation between cardiovascular
disease and pre-eclampsia. They report a strong relation: an eightfold
higher risk of death from cardiovascular causes in women with early
onset pre-eclampsia, compared with women with normal, term pregnancies.
How do we use these data to counsel women? The women in this
study were followed for a median of 13 years. Because these were all
first pregnancies, we are dealing with very early onset cardiovascular disease, and therefore many cardiovascular events are likely to occur
before menopause. How can this finding be generalised to any patient
with pre-eclampsia? Most women with pre-eclampsia deliver after 37 weeks' gestation, so the finding does not apply to them. In this study
women who delivered at term were not at increased risk of death from
cardiovascular causes.
What about any woman with pre-eclampsia who has a preterm delivery? The
young age at which these cardiovascular events occur raises the
possibility that even among women delivering preterm there is a small
subset with a high risk, and that most women will not be at increased
risk. Is there a way to identify this high risk group? Traditionally,
recurrent pre-eclampsia has been the identifying factor for a much
higher risk of later cardiovascular disease. A much smaller study found
that women with recurrent pre-eclampsia had an 18-fold increased risk
of hypertension in later life, compared with women with normal
pregnancies.4 It would be interesting for the authors to
look at this subset of women. For now we can conclude that there is a
relation between pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease in later
life, and that this is especially relevant to a subset (as yet
unidentified) of those women who have a preterm delivery.
pregnancies in which
pre-eclampsia occurred and that were delivered after 37 weeks actually
had a higher proportion of large babies.2 Irgen et al's
findings again emphasise a difference according to gestational age,
though this time the difference is in the mother's condition. Their
findings also support the relation between pre-eclampsia and preterm
birth. Women who delivered preterm but who did not have pre-eclampsia
had a higher risk of death from cardiovascular causes. It is sometimes
not appreciated that about a third of preterm deliveries are associated with an implantation abnormality identical to that present in pre-eclampsia.3
![]()
References
1.
Lie RT, Rasmussen S, Brunborg H, Gjessing HK, Lie-Nielsen E, Irgens LM.
Fetal and maternal contributions to risk of pre-eclampsia: population based study.
BMJ
1998;
316:
1343-1347.
2.
Xiong X, Demianczuk NN, Buekens P, Saunders LD.
Association of preeclampsia with high birth weight for gestational age.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
2000;
183:
148-155[Medline].
3.
Arias F, Rodriquez L, Rayne SC, Kraus FT.
Maternal placental vasculopathy and infection: two distinct subgroups among patients with preterm labor and preterm ruptured membranes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1993;
168:
585-591[Medline].
4.
Sibai B, El-Nazer A, Gonzalez-Ruiz A.
Severe preeclampsia-eclampsia in young primigravid women: subsequent pregnancy outcome and remote prognosis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1986;
155:
1011-1016[Medline].
© BMJ 2001
Read all Rapid Responses