BMJ 2001;323:633 ( 15 September )

Letters

Prevalence of autism in early 1970s may have been underestimated

EDITOR---Recently, concerns about an apparent increase in the prevalence of autism in the general population, and the pathophysiology behind this, have been prominent in the press. Before these concerns can be addressed we need to be sure that the prevalence has truly increased. A cohort study was thought suitable to provide an insight into whether the prevalence of autistic disorders has increased.

In the British cohort 1970 study (BCS70) only five children were identified as having autism (and one as having suspected autism) at the age of 5 in disability data files. This gives a prevalence of 6/13 135 (0.45/1000)---comparable with that found in previous studies. 1 2

A focus group consisting of practising consultants (from adult and paediatric disciplines) experienced in the diagnosis of autistic disorders was convened. This group identified several diagnostic features from the available data that they thought were important in making a diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorder. The aim was to identify whether there were missing or undiagnosed cases with current commonly used diagnostic features. The features identified from the original BCS70 questionnaire included:

  • At age 5
    Restless
    Solitary; does things on own
    Fearful, afraid of new situations
    Fussy or over particular
  • At age 10
    Does things on own; rather solitary
    Afraid of new situations
    Fussy or over particular
    Hums or makes odd noises
    Obsessional
    Requests must be met immediately

When an analogue scale was used, only the most extreme cases---that is, the top fifth---were identified. Cases in which the child had all features present at both age 5 and age 10 were then identified.

Using the methodology above, we identified 56 cases from 14 904 children studied at age 10, giving a prevalence of 3.76/1000. This suggests that these children have an autistic spectrum disorder when contemporary diagnostic features are used.

Our finding agrees with current lifetime prevalence figures suggested by Powell et al.3 Thus estimates of prevalence from the early 1970s may have seriously underestimated the prevalence at that time. Confirmation of this suggestion would require contemporary assessment of the individuals involved.

Helen Heussler, lecturer in community child health
honey.heussler{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Leon Polnay, professor of community paediatrics
Division of Child Health, School of Human Development, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH

Elizabeth Marder, consultant community paediatrician
Department of Paediatrics, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 32UH

Penny Standen, reader in health psychology and learning disability
Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham

Chin Lyn U, formerly data manager BCS70 Nottingham
Division of Psychiatry, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG3 6AA

Neville Butler, senior research fellow BCS70
80 Cumberland Road, Bristol BS1 6UG



1. Gillberg C, Wing L. Autism: not an extremely rare disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999; 99: 399-406[Medline].
2. Kaye J, del Mar Melero-Montes M, Jick H. Mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine and the incidence of autism recorded by general practitioners: a time trend analysis. BMJ 2001; 322: 460-463[Abstract/Free Full Text]. (24 February.)
3. Powell J, Edwards A, Edwards M, Pandit B, Sungum-Paliwal S, Whitehouse W. Changes in the incidence of childhood autism and other autistic spectrum disorders in preschool children from two areas of the West Midlands. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000; 42: 624-628[CrossRef][Medline].


© BMJ 2001

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Any changes in prevalence of autism must be determined
Mark F Blaxill
BMJ 2002 324: 296. [Extract] [Full Text]

Mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine and the incidence of autism recorded by general practitioners: a time trend analysis
James A Kaye, Maria del Mar Melero-Montes, and Hershel Jick
BMJ 2001 322: 460-463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Blaxill, M. F (2002). Any changes in prevalence of autism must be determined. BMJ 324: 296-296 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

focus groups are now considered science?
Mark F Blaxill
bmj.com, 16 Sep 2001 [Full text]
Prevalence of autism in the past may have been underestimated
William Whitehouse
bmj.com, 29 Sep 2001 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Sepsis

The latest guidlines will affect how we practice medicine

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview