Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Clive Ballard Royal College of Psychiatrists, London SW1X 8PG Correspondence to: Andrew Fairbairn, Royal
College of Psychiatrists, London SW1X 8PG
Residential and nursing homes provide an essential
contribution towards the care of people with dementia. It is a
challenge to provide good care within tight budgets and often with a
workforce that has little formal training. Most people are cared for
within the private sector, although a limited number of NHS beds
provide continuing care for people with severe dementia and intractable behaviour problems.
Dementia care mapping1 is a direct, standardised
assessment with good interrater reliability.2 Activities
are coded according to category of behaviour, and they are recorded
every five minutes. Wellbeing is measured using the dementia care
index, which indicates the overall quality of care within a particular environment extrapolated from dementia care mapping evaluations of half
of the residents.1 We used dementia care mapping to evaluate the quality of care in 10 private sector and seven NHS care facilities.
People living in care facilities from specific geographical
catchment areas in three regions of the United Kingdom received a
standardised assessment from which an operationalised diagnosis of
dementia was made.3 The facilities in the group included all seven NHS continuing care units and 10 of 12 private sector facilities with more than 35 residents in the designated areas. Dementia care mapping evaluations were completed by researchers from
medical, nursing, or psychology backgrounds. All had completed a
certified training course and achieved good interrater reliability ( A total of 367 people with dementia were identified; of these, dementia
care mapping was used to evaluate 218 (59%)
(table).
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
scores >0.8) in a six hour evaluation with a senior mapper. A dementia
care index score was calculated, and an overall category was assigned
to the quality of care.
The dementia care index rated all seven (100%) NHS facilities
(dementia care index rating range
1.6 to 4.1) and five (50%) of the
private sector facilities as needing radical improvement (dementia care
index rating range 4.1-8.8); the remaining five (50%) private sector
facilities were rated as needing much improvement (dementia care index
rating range 12.3-20.4). Over the six hour daytime period of
observation, people spent 61 minutes (17%) asleep and 108 minutes
(30%) either socially withdrawn or not actively engaged in any form of
basic or constructive activity. Only 50 minutes (14%) were spent
talking (or communicating in other ways) with staff or other residents,
and less than 12 minutes (3%) were spent engaged in everyday
constructive activities other than watching television (11
minutes (3%)). The remaining 33% of the observation period was spent
engaged in basic activities such as eating, going to the toilet, etc.
| |
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Quality of care was rated as needing radical improvement or much
improvement in all homes, and no home showed even a fair standard of
care. Can our results be regarded as representative? The homes were not
selected because of perceived poor standards of care
17/19
(89%) of the large care facilities in the designated area were
surveyed, and the characteristics of the residents were consistent with
recent reports. Current care provision is inadequate, at least
according to dementia care index standards, and urgent action is
required. The evaluation methods currently used by joint inspection
teams, do not make use of direct observation, so may not be sufficient
to fully evaluate the care environment.
Recent reports have highlighted the need for review and improvement of
the standards of care in residential and nursing
homes.
4 5
Our data emphasise the need for urgency in this
process. The proposed national standards for care in residential and
nursing homes for elderly people describe interaction and daily
activity as one of 11 key domains.5 These aspects of care
require particular attention, and they merit a greater focus within
revised standards. Improved strategies for joint working between the
NHS, social services, and private care providers will ensure that
integrated specialist teams can deliver high quality care to these
vulnerable patients.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We would like to thank Mental Health Foundation and Research Into Ageing, who funded studies from which some of the data were acquired.
Contributors: All authors helped to formulate the study design, coordinate the collection of data, and write the paper. CB undertook the data evaluation and will act as guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Kitwood T, Bredin K. Evaluating dementia care: the DCM method. 7th ed. Bradford: Bradford Dementia Research Group, 1997. |
| 2. | Brooker D. Looking at them looking at me. A review of observational studies into the quality of institutional care for elderly people with dementia. J Ment Health 1995; 4: 145-156. |
| 3. | Copeland JR, Kelleher MJ, Kellett JM, Gourlay AJ, Gurland BJ, Fleiss JL, et al. A semi structured clinical interview for the assessment of diagnosis and mental state in the elderly. The geriatric mental state schedule: development. Psychol Med 1976; 6: 439-449[Medline]. |
| 4. | Leaper R, ed. Training and qualifications for work with older people. Report of a national conference with recommendations for action. National Council on Ageing. London: Age Concern, 1998. |
| 5. | Department of Health. Fit for the Future? National required standards for residential and nursing homes for older people. London: DoH, 1999. www.doh.gov.uk/pub/docs/doh/fitfuture.pdf (accessed 9 May 2001). |
(Accepted 6 April 2001)
Read all Rapid Responses