Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Jonathan Evans a Division of Psychiatry,
University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8DZ, b Unit of Paediatric and
Perinatal Epidemiology, Division of Child Health, University of
Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, c Department of Women's Health and Care of the Newborn, North
Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10
5NB, d Mother and Baby
Unit, Barrow Hospital, Barrow Gurney, Bristol BS48 3SG Correspondence
to: J Evans j.evans{at}bristol.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To follow mothers' mood through
pregnancy and after childbirth and compare reported symptoms of
depression at each stage.
Women are more vulnerable to psychiatric illness during the
postnatal period. The rate of psychiatric admission is increased postnatally, mostly because of the raised risk of psychosis in the
first month after childbirth.1 In 1968, Pitt described a
syndrome of "atypical depression following
childbirth,"2 although there is now no evidence that
there is a categorical difference between depression after childbirth
and depression at other times. The prevalence of non-psychotic
depressive illness in the postnatal period is similar to that in the
general population.
3 4
Nevertheless, postnatal depression has become a focus of concern.
General practitioners, health visitors, and others are exhorted to
recognise and treat this condition. The consequences of postnatal depression to the child, mother, and family may include neglect of the
child, family breakdown, self harm, and suicide. However, the more
common consequences include emotional and behavioural problems, and
cognitive delay in the children of depressed mothers.
5 6
In contrast, depression during pregnancy has been relatively neglected.
Indeed, pregnancy was thought to protect women against depression.
Studies of antenatal psychopathology have mostly examined antenatal
mood as a predictor of postnatal depression.7-10 Watson et al found that in 23% of those who had postnatal depression this had
started during pregnancy.11 Depressed mood during
pregnancy has also been associated with poor attendance at antenatal
clinics, substance misuse, low birth weight, and preterm
delivery.
12 13
Psychopathological symptoms during
pregnancy have physiological consequences for the fetus, which may
explain some of these effects.14
We studied mood through pregnancy and after childbirth using
prospectively gathered data from a cohort of 14 000 women. We compared
depressive symptom score, the pattern of reported symptoms, and the
proportion of mothers above a threshold indicating probable depressive
disorder at each stage.
The Avon longitudinal study of parents and children enrolled women
resident in Avon who were in the early stages of pregnancy with an
expected date of delivery between 1 April 1991 and 31 December 1992. We
recruited 14 541 women, of whom 13 799 had offspring surviving to 12 months old. Further details of the study aims and design are available
(www.ich.bris.ac.uk/alspacext/). Ethical approval was
obtained from the study's ethics committee and local ethics committees.
Women completed the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale15
and the Crown Crisp experiential index16 as part of a
series of postal questionnaires. We present here data for
questionnaires completed at 18 weeks and 32 weeks of pregnancy and at 8 weeks and 8 months postpartum. The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale focuses on the cognitive and affective features of depression rather
than somatic symptoms. It is the only self report scale that has been
validated for use postnatally and during pregnancy.
17 18
The scale cannot in itself confirm a diagnosis of depression; however,
a score above 12 is widely used to indicate probable depressive
disorder. Validation of the scale showed that all those found to have
definite major depression when interviewed, had scored above 12 on the
scale. Use of this threshold gave an overall sensitivity of 86% and
specificity of 78% for all forms of depression.15
Statistical methods
Of the 13 799 eligible mothers, 12 059 (87%) completed at least
one of the four questionnaires and 9028 (65%) completed all four.
Table 1 shows the mean Edinburgh postnatal depression scale scores
for each period. Mean scores were higher in pregnancy than postnatally,
with a peak at 32 weeks of pregnancy of 6.72 (SD 4.94) and a lowest
value at 8 months postpartum (5.25 (4.61)). The mean change in
depression score from that at 18 weeks of pregnancy was
Table 1.
Design:
Longitudinal cohort study.
Setting:
Avon.
Participants:
Pregnant women resident within Avon
with an expected date of delivery between 1 April 1991 and 31 December 1992.
Main outcome measures:
Symptom scores from the
Edinburgh postnatal depression scale at 18 and 32 weeks of pregnancy
and 8 weeks and 8 months postpartum. Proportion of women above a
threshold indicating probable depressive disorder.
Results:
Depression scores were higher at 32 weeks of pregnancy than 8 weeks postpartum (difference in means 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 0.97). There was no difference in the
distribution of total scores or scores for individual items at the four
time points. 1222 (13.5%) women scored above threshold for probable
depression at 32 weeks of pregnancy, 821 (9.1%) at 8 weeks postpartum,
and 147 (1.6%) throughout. More mothers moved above the threshold for
depression between 18 weeks and 32 weeks of pregnancy than between 32 weeks of pregnancy and 8 weeks postpartum.
Conclusions:
Symptoms of depression are not more
common or severe after childbirth than during pregnancy. Research and clinical efforts need to be moved towards understanding, recognising, and treating antenatal depression.
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
Participants and methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References
We calculated mean Edinburgh postnatal depression scale scores for
all responders and those responding at all four time points. Although
the scores were negatively skewed, the differences in scores were
symmetric and normal enough for analysis with paired t
tests. The 95% confidence intervals for the differences in the mean values were corrected for multiple (six) comparisons. We plotted
frequency histograms of total scores for each period and compared
changes in symptom score between 18 weeks and 32 weeks of pregnancy
with changes between 32 weeks of pregnancy and 8 weeks postpartum using
a paired t test. Mean scores for each item of the
Edinburgh postnatal depression scales at each time point were plotted
to compare the frequency with which each symptom was reported. We
repeated the analyses on the data from the Crown Crisp experiential
index depression subscale to investigate whether a different scale
produced any substantial differences in results.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References
0.097 (95%
confidence interval
0.18 to
0.01, P=0.025) at 32 weeks of
pregnancy, 0.78 (0.69 to 0.88, P<0.001) at 8 weeks postpartum, and
1.37 (1.27 to 1.46, P<0.001) at 8 months postpartum. Mean change in
score was 0.88 (0.79 to 0.97, P<0.001) between 32 weeks of pregnancy
and 8 weeks postpartum, 1.46 (1.37 to 1.56, P<0.001) between 32 weeks
of pregnancy and 8 months postpartum, and
0.58 (
0.50 to
0.67,
P<0.001) between 8 weeks and 8 months postpartum. Women who did not
complete all four questionnaires had higher depression symptom scores
than women who completed all four. The mean depression scores were
therefore higher when partial responders were included (table
1).
There was a small rise in depression symptom score during pregnancy
(mean change 0.10; SE 0.043) and a small drop after childbirth (
0.88; 0.047). These changes were significantly different
(difference 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.13; P<0.001).
Table 2 shows the cumulative frequency of women with increasing Edinburgh postnatal depression scores at the four time points. The distribution did not differ between the time points.
|
Table 3 gives the scores for each item in the questionnaire. A similar pattern was seen at all four time points, but question 3 (I have blamed myself unnecessarily when things went wrong) was rated higher at 18 weeks of pregnancy that at other times and question 6 (things have been getting on top of me) was rated lower at 8 months postpartum than at other times.
|
When we repeated the above analyses using the Crown Crisp experiential index depression subscale there was no substantial differences in the findings.
The proportion of women with probable depression (Edinburgh postnatal
depression score
13) was 11.8% at 18 weeks of pregnancy, 13.5% at
32 weeks of pregnancy, 9.1 % at 8 weeks postpartum, and 8.1% at 8 months postpartum (table 1). In all, 147 (1.6%) women had probable
depression at all four time points and 6771 (75%) scored below the
threshold at all time points; 436 (4.8%) had probable depression at 32 weeks of pregnancy only and 240 (2.7%) at 8 weeks postpartum only.
Of the 7966 women who were below the threshold for probable
depression at 18 weeks of pregnancy, 673 (8.4%) were above the threshold at 32 weeks of pregnancy. Of the 7806 below the threshold for
probable depression at 32 weeks of pregnancy, 410 (5.3%) were above
the threshold at 8 weeks postpartum. There were 253 (3.2%) fewer women
newly rising above the threshold for probable depression after
childbirth than during pregnancy (95% confidence interval 2.4% to
4.0%).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We found that mothers have higher scores on the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in pregnancy than postnatally and that the distribution of total scores and individual symptoms did not differ before and after childbirth. These data suggest that depression is no more likely after childbirth than it is after events during pregnancy.
Validity of instrument
Self report instruments do not provide a clinical diagnosis
of depression. Some mothers scoring above the threshold will not have a
depressive illness and some below the threshold will. However, a
validation study found that a score of
13 gave the best estimate of
prevalence of depression.15 This threshold may
overestimate depression during pregnancy.17 However, even if we used a higher threshold in pregnancy than postnatally, depression was still common during pregnancy. Furthermore, the proportion of women
rating themselves as severely depressed was similar before and after
childbirth. We found no evidence that the question asking whether the
woman feared she might harm herself was misinterpreted or overrated
during pregnancy, despite suggestions that this could happen.19
Patterns of depression
We found no evidence to support the existence of a subgroup of
women with a specific type or severity of symptoms. It has been
suggested that a small subgroup of women with postnatal depression have
abnormal thyroid function leading to depressed mood.20
Women who did not respond at all time points had higher depression
scores, and the non-responders probably included some of the most
depressed women. Our results may therefore be biased by selective
non-response among women with severe postnatal depression. Another
explanation for our lower postnatal scores is that incidence of
depression may peak at a time not measured in this study. Our data
support research suggesting that there is no difference in the pattern
of symptoms of depression during pregnancy or postnatally. Thus,
postnatal depression does not seem to be a distinct syndrome.
Implications
The consequences of antenatal depression are not well understood.
Psychopathology during pregnancy may have an important effect on the
uterine environment,14 and research is urgently needed
into the consequences for the child of antenatal depression.
|
What is known on this topic
Postnatal depression is common Recognising and treating depression is emphasised in postnatal care Depression is also common in pregnancy What this study addsSelf reported symptom scores for depression are higher in pregnancy than postnatally The severity and nature of depressed mood does not differ before and after childbirth More mothers have scores that rise above a threshold for probable depression during pregnancy than after childbirth |
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the mothers and fathers who took part and the midwives for their cooperation and help in recruitment. The study team comprises interviewers, computer technicians, laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, and managers, who continue to make the study possible.
Contributors: JE wrote the paper and planned the data analyses, JH analysed the data, and HF planned the analyses and commented on the final draft of the paper. SO contributed to writing the paper and commented on the final draft. JG designed the study, advised on data analysis, and commented on the final draft. The ALSPAC study team designed the study and collected and entered the data. JE will act as guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, Department of Health, Department of the Environment, and various charitable organisations and commercial companies. The ALSPAC study is part of the WHO initiated European longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Kendall RE, Wainwright S, Hailey A, Shannon B. The influence of childbirth on psychiatric morbidity. Psychol Med 1976; 6: 297-302[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Pitt B.
Atypical depression following childbirth.
Br J Psychiatry
1968;
114:
1325-1335 |
| 3. |
Cooper PJ, Campbell EA, Day A, Kennerley H, Bond A.
Non-psychotic psychiatric disorder after childbirth: a prospective study of prevalence, incidence, course and nature.
Br J Psychiatry
1988;
152:
799-806 |
| 4. | O'Hara MW, Zekoski EM, Phillips LH, Wright EJ. Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood disorders: comparison of childbearing and non-childbearing women. J Abnormal Psychol 1990; 99: 3-15[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 5. |
Sinclair D, Murray L.
Effects of postnatal depression on children's adjustment to school.
Br J Psychiatry
1998;
172:
58-63 |
| 6. | Murray L, Sinclair D, Cooper P, Ducournau P, Turner P. The socioemotional development of 5 year olds with postnatally depressed mothers. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1999; 40: 1259-1271[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | O'Hara MW, Neunaber DJ, Zekoski EM. Prospective study of postpartum depression: prevalence, course and predictive factors. J Abnormal Psychol 1984; 93: 158-171[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Green MJ. Who is unhappy after childbirth? Antenatal and intrapartum correlates from a prospective study. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1990; 8: 175-183. |
| 9. | Hobfoll SE, Ritter C, Lavin J, Hulsizer MR, Cameron RP. Depression prevalence and incidence among inner-city pregnant and postpartum women. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995; 65: 445-453. |
| 10. |
Cox JL, Connor Y, Kendell RE.
Prospective study of the psychiatric disorders of childbirth.
Br J Psychiatry
1982;
140:
111-117 |
| 11. |
Watson JP, Elliott SA, Rugg AJ, Brough DI.
Psychiatric disorder in pregnancy and the first postnatal year.
Br J Psychiatry
1984;
144:
453-462 |
| 12. | Pagel MD, Smilkstein G, Regen H, Montano D. Psychosocial influences on new born outcome: a controlled prospective study. Soc Sci Med 1990; 30: 597-604. |
| 13. | Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB, Sabroe S, Secher NJ. Psychological distress in pregnancy and preterm delivery. BMJ 1993; 307: 234-239. |
| 14. |
Teixeira JMA, Fisk NM, Glover V.
Association between maternal anxiety in pregnancy and increased uterine artery resistance index: cohort based study.
BMJ
1999;
318:
153-157 |
| 15. |
Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R.
Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale.
Br J Psychiatry
1987;
150:
782-786 |
| 16. | Crown S, Crisp AH. Manual of the Crown-Crisp experiential index. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1979. |
| 17. | Murray D, Cox JL. Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh depression scale (EPDS). J Reprod Infant Psychol 1990; 8: 99-107. |
| 18. | Thorpe K. A study of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale for use with parent groups outside the postpartum period. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1993; 11: 119-125. |
| 19. | Green JM, Snowdon C, Statham H. EPDS by post. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 158: 865. |
| 20. | Harris B, Othman S, Davies JA, Weppner GJ, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG, et al. Association between postpartum thyroid antibodies and depression. BMJ 1992; 305: 152-156. |
| 21. | Fergusson D, Horwood J, Thorpe K, ALSPAC Study Team. Changes in depression during and following pregnancy. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiol 1996; 10: 279-293[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Cooper PJ, Murray L.
Course and recurrence of postnatal depression. evidence for the specificity of the diagnostic concept.
Br J Psychiatry
1995;
166:
191-195 |
| 23. |
Mynors-Wallis LM, Gath DH, Day A, Baker F.
Randomised controlled trial of problem solving treatment, antidepressant medication, and combined treatment for major depression in primary care.
BMJ
2000;
320:
26-23 |
| 24. | Spinelli MG. Interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed antepartum women: a pilot study. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154: 1028-1030[Abstract]. |
(Accepted 19 April 2001)
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.