Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR In patients with acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke the
extent of necrosis is the main but not the only determinant of
prognosis. Age and vascular comorbidity are not necessarily related to
infarct size but are nevertheless important predictors of prognosis.
The reasons for a variable response to the necrotic insult are probably
multiple and require a clear understanding as they may represent
independent additional determinants of prognosis.
I looked again at data that colleagues and I obtained in a cohort of
patients after ischaemic stroke.3 The C reactive protein concentrations increased ( The strong association between infarct size and increased C reactive
protein concentrations may result from accurate quantification of
cerebral infarction by computed tomography and from a variable intensity of the acute phase response to inflammatory stimuli (in this
case, the extent of cerebral infarction). This possibility is suggested
by the observation that 24 hour concentrations were much higher in
patients with previous raised concentrations.5
If the intensity of the acute phase response was not proportional
to the intensity of the inflammatory stimulus, the variable increase in the C reactive protein concentration might not just be a
consequence of late recanalisation or persistent occlusion of the
infarct related artery. Thus the prognostic importance of the 24 hour
concentration may be related partly to the extent of the necrosis
and partly to the unknown individual determinants of the intensity
of the acute phase response. C reactive protein might indicate the
inflammatory status during the acute phase of ischaemic stroke and
might aid in current challenges posed in secondary prevention.
Higher C reactive protein concentrations indicate increased risk
of coronary and cerebrovascular events in otherwise healthy
individuals1 and a worse prognosis in myocardial
infarction2 and ischaemic stroke.3 According
to Pepys and Berger, the available data support its potential role as a
marker of cardiovascular risk.4 To be of clinical use,
however, the protein must have an independent prognostic value over and
above that of the data already routinely available.
5 mg/l) in about three quarters of patients within 24 hours after ischaemic stroke, and higher values were
significantly associated with large infarct size (60% (n=87/146) v 26% (n=12/47); P<0.0001,
2 test)
and worse outcome (36% (n=52) v 9% (n=4); P=0.0008, log rank test). Smaller increases were reported in patients with small infarcts (median 8 mg/l (25th to 75th centile 3.8 to 26.3 mg/l) v 18 mg/l (10 to 35 mg/l); P=0.0002, Mann-Whitney U test)
and deep infarcts (8 mg/l (3 to 26 mg/l) v 19 mg/l (10 to 46 mg/l); P<0.0001).
Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Casa di Cura
Villa Pini d'Abruzzo, 661080 Chieti, Italy
mariodinapoli{at}katamail.com
| 1. |
Ridker P, Cushman M, Stampfer M, Tracy R, Hennekens C.
Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men.
N Engl J Med
1997;
336:
973-979 |
| 2. |
Pietilä KO, Harmoinen AP, Jokiniitty J, Pasternak AI.
Serum C-reactive protein concentration in acute myocardial infarction and its relationship to mortality during 24 months of follow-up in patients under thrombolytic treatment.
Eur Heart J
1996;
17:
1345-1349 |
| 3. |
Di Napoli M, Papa F, Bocola V.
Prognostic influence of increased C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels in ischemic stroke.
Stroke
2001;
32:
133-138 |
| 4. |
Pepys MB, Berger A.
The renaissance of C reactive protein.
BMJ
2001;
322:
5-6 |
| 5. |
Di Napoli M.
HGM-coA reductase inhibitors (statins). A promising approach to stroke prevention.
Neurology
2000;
55:
1066-1067 |