Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Hugh M Mather Royal College
of Physicians, London NW1 4LE
Correspondence to: H
Mather, Ealing Hospital, Southall UB1 3HW hmather{at}onetel.net.uk
Almost 40% of all specialist registrars who hold national
training numbers in medical specialties are women.1 Little
is known about their career intentions, and specifically on how they plan to cope with the competing pressures of family and career when
they become consultants. Questions on this issue were therefore included in a recent national survey of specialist registrars.
The Royal College of Physicians sent a questionnaire in December
1999 to all 2495 trainees in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland
holding national training numbers in medical specialties. Replies were
received from 1362 (55%), of whom 1311 answered the question, would
you like a part time (eight sessions or less) post when you become a
consultant? They had five options: "yes
More than 40% of all specialist registrars in medical
specialties (about 75% of women and 25% of men) are considering
working part time as consultants. Whether those who expressed an
interest in part time work actually take up such posts depends on many factors, including whether specialist part time jobs become available. Yet feedback from focus groups has confirmed that most women trainees envisage working part time when they have young families, and that an
increasing proportion of men seek greater participation in family life
and perhaps a more balanced lifestyle. These results are entirely
consistent with other recent surveys of trainees and
consultants.2-4 The financial imperative to work full
time is reduced if both partners in a relationship hold professional posts. Additionally, the availability of women (and men) to take up
consultant posts is often compromised by the need to be close to their
partners' place of work, especially as about half of women trainees
have partners who work in medicine.2
The impact of these factors on the future supply of consultants is
obvious and potentially devastating, particularly in specialties with a
high proportion of female trainees. Yet no allowance has been made for
this in the calculations of the Specialist Workforce Advisory Group. In
the light of the findings of this survey plans to reduce the totals of
national training numbers in some major specialties may be badly
misguided. Many more part time consultant posts will be needed to use
the skills of women and men who seek part time work, and
correspondingly more trainees will be required to maintain an adequate
supply of consultants in future years.
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
definitely," "yes
probably," "yes
possibly," "no
probably not," and
"no
definitely not." The number and percentage of women (n=541)
giving each response were 83 (15%), 105 (19%), 186 (34%), 120 (22%), and 47 (9%), and those of men (n=770) were 19 (2%), 34 (4%),
117 (15%), 265 (34%), and 335 (44%). A total of 1309 answered the
question about whether they would consider a "job share"
consultant post at some stage in their career, and had the same
response options. The number and percentage of women (n=537) giving
each response were 64 (12%), 100 (19%), 247 (46%), 95 (18%), and 31 (6%), and those of men (n=772) were 11 (1%), 26 (3%), 157 (20%),
241 (31%), and 337 (44%). The table shows the number and percentage
of men, women, and all specialist registrars in the major specialties
who replied "yes" to the questions on working part time and job
sharing. These comprised 69% and 77% of women, 22% and 25% of men,
and 41% and 46% of all respondents. The proportions responding
positively in the specialties varied markedly, depending mainly on the
gender ratio of trainees, from about 25% of those in cardiology
to 75% of those in palliative medicine.
possibly," "yes
probably," or
"yes
definitely" when asked whether they would consider a part
time post (
8 sessions) or a job share when they became a consultant
![]()
Comment
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
I thank Joan Welch for inputting the data, Drs Fiona Gordon, Catherine Nelson-Piercey, and Stuart Bennett for help in designing the questionnaire, and Clive Constable and other colleagues at the Royal College of Physicians for enthusiastic support.
Contributors: HMM is sole author and guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Royal College of Physicians.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Mather HM. Consultant prospects in medical specialties. J R Coll Physicians Lond 2000; 34: 289-294[Medline]. |
| 2. | BMA cohort study of 1995 medical graduates fifth report,
March 2000. http://web.bma.org.uk/public/polsreps.nsf/ (accessed 14 Mar
2001)
|
| 3. | Evans J, Goldacre MJ, Lambert TW. Views of UK medical graduates about flexible and part-time working in medicine: a qualitative study. Med Educ 2000; 34: 355-362[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Dumelow C, Littlejohns P, Griffiths S.
Relation between a career and family life for English hospital consultants: qualitative, semistructured interview study.
BMJ
2000;
320:
1437-1440 |
(Accepted 2 November 2000)
Read all Rapid Responses