Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
P H Whincup a Department of Public Health Sciences, St
George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE, b Department of General Practice and Primary
Care, Medical Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London E1 4NS
Correspondence to: P H Whincup p.whincup{at}sghms.ac.uk
The possibility that puberty is occurring earlier in
Britain than previously has caused great interest.1
Despite the importance of menarcheal age as an indicator of
puberty,2 there is little information on menarcheal age in
contemporary teenagers to compare with data on girls born in the 1950s
and 1960s. We report on the distribution of menarcheal age in a survey
of British girls born between 1982 and 1986.
In 1998-9 we studied the cardiovascular health of
secondary school children aged 12-16 in schools in 10 British
towns: five in southern England (Esher, Leatherhead, Chelmsford, Bath,
Tunbridge Wells), three in north west England (Wigan, Burnley,
Rochdale), and two in south Wales (Port Talbot, Rhondda). We
approached those secondary schools corresponding to a stratified random
sample of primary schools in our earlier study3; 62 of 65 (95%) with female pupils participated. In each school we invited girls
from the earlier study to participate, with a supplementary random sample of pupils from the same classes.3 During screening
the girls completed a confidential self administered questionnaire on
date of birth, whether they had started their periods and, if so, their
age (years and months) at the first period. Social class was based on
parental occupation (using the Registrar General's 1990 classification). Ethnicity was based on appearance and cross checked
with surname and parental self assessment. We used SAS (version
6.12) for the statistical analysis. We determined the median age of
menarche and confidence intervals using survival analysis with PROC
LIFETEST. We included girls who had not yet had their first period (88 participants); for girls providing only year of menarche (231), the
month was imputed using the mean value for other girls of the same age
in years. Probit transformation2 of the percentage of
affirmative responses at each age gave almost identical results. In
all, 1166 girls aged 12-16 years (1068 European, 79 South Asian, 19 other) reported their menarcheal age (response 66%). The median
menarcheal age was 12 years 11 months (95% confidence interval 12 years 10 months to 13 years 1 month). The percentages of girls who
reported having had their first period by their 10th, 11th, or 12th
birthdays were 0.8, 3.6 and 21.7, respectively; 11.8% had their first
period before leaving primary school. Median ages of menarche were
similar in different regions (table) and did not differ by social class
or ethnic group (see table on website). Non-responders closely
resembled responders in age and geographical location.
The median age of menarche in contemporary British teenagers
is around 13 years. In our study geographical, social, and ethnic variations were small, suggesting that non-response bias in menarcheal age was likely to be limited. Comparison with British girls born between 1950 and 1965 (table) suggests that the median menarcheal age
reported here is close to or slightly below the earlier findings. Two
points emerge clearly from the results. Firstly, any decrease in
average menarcheal age during the past 20-30 years has been small
(almost certainly less than six months), particularly when compared
with the reduction of a year or more that occurred in many European
countries (including Britain) between the late 19th and mid 20th
centuries.
2 4
Secondly, even though no appreciable recent
decrease in menarcheal age has occurred, almost one girl in eight
reaches menarche while still at primary school. This needs to be taken
into account when providing sanitary facilities and health information
for female pupils in primary school.
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
![]()
Comment
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank all the participants for their help.
Contributors: PHW and DGC had the idea for the paper and designed the study with support from KO and SJCT. JAG carried out the analyses. PHW drafted the paper, with contributions from all authors. PHW and DGC will act as guarantors for the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: This study was funded by the Wellcome Trust (grant 051187/Z/97/A).
Competing interests: None declared.
A figure showing age at menarche,
a longer version of the table, and details of the previous studies
appear on the BMJ's website
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ellen B. Too much, too young . . . Observer, 18 Jun 2000;1:4. |
| 2. | Eveleth PB, Tanner JM. Worldwide variation in human growth 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. |
| 3. |
Whincup PH, Cook DG, Adshead F, Taylor S, Papacosta O, Walker M, et al.
Cardiovascular risk factors in British children from towns with widely differing adult cardiovascular mortality.
BMJ
1996;
313:
79-84 |
| 4. | Tanner JM. Trend towards earlier menarche in London, Oslo, Copenhagen, the Netherlands and Hungary. Nature 1973; 243: 95-96[CrossRef][Medline]. |
(Accepted 15 December 2000)
Read all Rapid Responses