BMJ 2001;322:895-896 ( 14 April )

Papers

Take home naloxone and the prevention of deaths from opiate overdose: two pilot schemes

Kerstin Dettmer, project director aBill Saunders, director bJohn Strang, director c

a Fixpunkt e V Mobilix, 10967 Berlin, Germany, b Alcohol and Drug Service, Gloucester Lodge, St Saviour, Jersey, Channel Islands JE2 7LB, c National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry and the Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AF

Correspondence to J Strang j.strang{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

Doctors routinely give naloxone during emergency resuscitation after opiate overdose. The distribution of naloxone to opiate addicts has recently been addressed,1-4 and a survey of drug users shows extensive support for the provision of supplies to take away.4 We present the preliminary results of two pilot schemes to provide take home naloxone to opiate users.


    Methods and results
Top
Methods and results
Comment
References

The Berlin project
In January 1999 drug users in Berlin were given naloxone to take home. Opiate misusers attending a healthcare project (operating from a mobile van or ambulance) were offered training in emergency resuscitation after overdose, provided with naloxone (two 400 µg ampoules), needles, syringes, an emergency handbook, and information on naloxone. They were asked to report on any use of the drug. After 16 months, 124 opiate misusers had received training in resuscitation and were provided with supplies of naloxone to take away; 40 reported back, with 22 having given emergency naloxone (two on two occasions, one on three, and one on four).


Case 1 (Berlin)

"Three days ago, I was walking along the canal with a friend of mine. We saw a guy lying on the ground, with two people trying to help him---they were trying to help him breathe by mouth to mouth. When we ran over to them, we could tell it wasn't really working. The guy was blue in the face and hardly breathing any more. I could barely feel his pulse. Right away I gave him one ampoule of naloxone---I didn't think I could find a vein so I just shot it real slow into his upper arm. We tried to give him CPR and we called 911. Then the guy started to wake up and he started to breathe and shake a little bit. He was so thankful, he wanted to give me 50 Marks, but I wouldn't take it. When the medics came I told them I had given him the naloxone. The medics said `Wow! So you guys have even got naloxone now?' But he thought it was great. He said we had probably just saved the guy's life." The ambulance staff then took the overdose victim to hospital for further observation.

The methods of administration were diverse. Resuscitation occurred both at home (17; 59%) and outdoors (parks, public restrooms) (11; 38%). In 10 instances the individual was unknown to the person resuscitating him or her (35%). Naloxone was given intramuscularly (14 instances; 48%), intravenously (13; 45%), and subcutaneously (2; 7%). One ampoule was the usual dose given (22; 76%). Half an ampoule was given to four people (14%) and both ampoules to three (10%). In 10 (34%) instances naloxone provoked a sudden onset of opiate withdrawal; no other side effects were reported. An ambulance was called for nine (31%). All 29 people recovered. Naloxone was judged appropriate in 26 (90%) cases, of uncertain benefit (no life threatening situation) in two (7%), and pointless in one (cocaine overdose). More risky consumption as a result of the availability of naloxone was not reported.

The Jersey project
From October 1998 over the next 16 months naloxone (one minijet ready filled with 800 µg naloxone) was provided to 101 drug misusers in contact with local drug services, with instructions on intramuscular administration and the wider principles of resuscitation from overdose and recovery. Five instances of resuscitation using naloxone were reported, and all fully recovered. No adverse consequences, other than withdrawal symptoms, were reported.


Case 2 (Jersey)

A known drug user rushed into the drug clinic demanding that he was immediately given a naloxone minijet to take away. Although agitated, he was resourceful enough to request that the minijet was assembled for him, and he then departed in haste. Some 20 minutes later he returned, accompanied by a shaken overdose victim who had some 15 minutes earlier been comatose and blue. "I was very nervous putting a big needle in him. I didn't know what would happen, what the result would be, but once I did it there was an immediate result that was a good one. He was dead. He came back to life." The overdose victim was then taken by ambulance to the local accident and emergency department where he was observed and made a full recovery.




    Comment
Top
Methods and results
Comment
References

This is the first published report of lives saved directly by the provision of take home naloxone. The drug was generally used appropriately. In only one case out of 34 was its use inappropriate, with two of doubtful benefit. No unexpected adverse effects were reported.

Ready prepared syringes of naloxone typically cost £3.30-6.70 per 400 µg. Since 10% of distributed doses were actually given, each use cost around £33-67. Even if lives were saved on only 10% of these occasions, then each would have been saved at a drug cost of £330-670.

The range of doses given raises the possibility that naloxone was being titrated to effect resuscitation without provoking withdrawal. If so, recovery needs monitoring to avoid subsequent relapse into overdose. Some casualty departments and ambulance services now recommend giving naloxone intramuscularly or subcutaneously rather than intravenously because it can be given more quickly and results in less violent recovery.5 The same advice may apply to administration by peers. In future, family members may be trained to give emergency naloxone,3 for whom non-intravenous administration would be more realistic.

Early reports are encouraging. No adverse effects have been reported, and 10% of distributed naloxone has saved lives. A study of the wider distribution of take home naloxone is now required.

    Acknowledgments

KD is author on behalf of Ines Loska, Astrid Leicht, Johannes Korporal, Eckhart Holthaus, and Michael de Ridder. BS is author on behalf of colleagues at the drugs services at St Helier.

Contributors: JS originally proposed the distribution of naloxone as a strategy for overdose prevention and brought together the authors. KD and BS were responsible for the collection of the data. All three authors contributed to the final manuscript. KD and BS will act as guarantors for their respective data in the paper.

    Footnotes

Colleagues in the Berlin project are listed at the end of the paper

Competing interests: None declared.


    References
Top
Methods and results
Comment
References

1. Strang J, Darke S, Hall W, Farrell M, Ali R. Heroin overdose: the case for take-home naloxone? BMJ 1996; 312: 1435[Free Full Text].
2. Darke S, Hall W. The distribution of naloxone to heroin users. Addiction 1997; 92: 1195-1199[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Strang J. Take-home naloxone: the next steps. Addiction 1999; 94: 207.
4. Strang J, Powis B, Best D, Vingoe L, Griffiths P, Taylor C, et al. Preventing opiate overdose fatalities with take-home naloxone: pre-launch study of possible impact and acceptability. Addiction 1999; 94: 199-204[CrossRef][Medline].
5. Wanger K, Brough L, Macmillan I, Goulding J, MacPhail I, Christenson JM. Intravenous versus subcutaneous naloxone for out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose. Acad Emerg Med 1999; 5: 293-299[Medline].

(Accepted 13 December 2000)


© BMJ 2001

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Take home naloxone for opiate addicts
Colin A Graham, Gordon W McNaughton, Alastair J Ireland, Kerry Cassells, David Mountain, Gil Blackwood, A J Ashworth, A Kidd, and John Strang
BMJ 2001 323: 934. [Extract] [Full Text]

Lateral thinking
BMJ 2001 322: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Lateral thinking
BMJ 2001 322: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Take home naloxone saves lives
BMJ 2001 322: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Doe-Simkins, M., Walley, A. Y., Epstein, A., Moyer, P. (2009). Saved by the Nose: Bystander-Administered Intranasal Naloxone Hydrochloride for Opioid Overdose. AJPH 99: 788-791 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Nutt, D. (2005). Cannabis antagonists: a new era of social psychopharmacology?. J Psychopharmacol 19: 3-4  
  • Sporer, K. A (2003). Strategies for preventing heroin overdose. BMJ 326: 442-444 [Full text]  
  • Graham, C. A, McNaughton, G. W, Ireland, A. J, Cassells, K., Mountain, D., Blackwood, G., Ashworth, A J, Kidd, A, Strang, J. (2001). Take home naloxone for opiate addicts. BMJ 323: 934-934 [Full text]  
  • (2001). Giving Naloxone to Narcotic Abusers Could Save Lives. JWatch Psychiatry 2001: 12-12 [Full text]  
  • (2001). Giving Naloxone to Narcotic Abusers Could Save Lives. JWatch General 2001: 7-7 [Full text]  
  • (2001). Beyond Needle Exchange: Take-Home Naloxone for IV Drug Users. JWatch Emergency Med. 2001: 7-7 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Naloxone - life saver?
Gil Blackwood
bmj.com, 16 Apr 2001 [Full text]
Apparent Advantages may be balanced by Hidden Harms
A J Ashworth, et al.
bmj.com, 20 Apr 2001 [Full text]
So little evidence- such big conclusions
David Mountain
bmj.com, 20 Apr 2001 [Full text]
CPR training for drug misusers
Colin A Graham
bmj.com, 22 Apr 2001 [Full text]
Take home naloxone: Life-saving intervention, medico-legal concern and heroin users' competence
Joan Trujols
bmj.com, 14 May 2001 [Full text]
Take Home Naloxone to Prevent Deaths from Opiate Overdose
Catherine Baca
bmj.com, 21 May 2001 [Full text]
Take home naloxone: a contribution for the ongoing debate
Fabrizio Schifano, et al.
bmj.com, 27 May 2001 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ