Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
M Clare Robertson a Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences, Otago Medical School, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand, b Department of
Economics, University of Otago, c Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Otago
Medical School
Correspondence to: M Clare Robertson
clare.robertson{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives:
To assess the effectiveness of trained
nurses based in general practices individually prescribing a home
exercise programme to reduce falls and injuries in elderly people and
to estimate the cost effectiveness of the programme.
Design:
Controlled trial with one year's follow up.
Setting:
32 general practices in seven southern New Zealand centres.
Participants:
450 women and men aged 80 years and older.
Intervention:
330 participants received the exercise
programme (exercise centres) and 120 received usual care (control
centres); 87% (371 of 426) completed the trial.
Main outcome measures:
Number of falls, number of
injuries resulting from falls, costs of implementing the programme, and
hospital costs as a result of falls.
Results:
Falls were reduced by 30% in the exercise centres (incidence rate ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to
0.84). The programme was equally effective in men and women. The
programme cost $NZ418 (£121) (at 1998 prices) per person to deliver
for one year or $NZ1519 (£441) per fall prevented. Fewer participants
had falls resulting in injuries, but there was no difference in the
number who had serious injuries and no difference in hospital costs
resulting from falls in exercise centres compared with control centres.
Conclusions:
An individually tailored exercise
programme, delivered by trained nurses from within general practices,
was effective in reducing falls in three different centres. This
strategy should be combined with other successful interventions to form part of home programmes to prevent falls in elderly people.
|
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three questions need to be addressed in the development and evaluation of a public health intervention: "can it work?", "does it work in practice?", and "is it worth it?"1 Our research group considered the efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency of a home based, individually tailored, muscle strengthening and balance retraining programme, designed to prevent falls in elderly people living in the community.
We tested the exercise programme in a group of women aged 80 years and older and showed it could work.2 The numbers of falls and falls resulting in moderate injuries were reduced when the exercise programme was delivered by a physiotherapist from the research group. The reduction in falls continued during a second year of follow up.3
In this paper we report the results from the second of two pragmatic
trials designed to test the effectiveness and efficiency of the same
exercise programme in routine clinical practice. In this trial the
programme was delivered from general practices by trained practice
nurses to men and women aged 80 years and older. We initiated the trial
as a health promotion exercise to evaluate the processes involved and
to determine whether the exercise programme would be as effective in
reducing falls in the wider community as it had been for women in the
initial trial in a research setting.
| |
Participants and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Participant recruitment
We identified potential participants aged 80 years and older from
computerised registers at 32 general practices (56 doctors) in seven
southern New Zealand centres. These patients received a letter from
their doctor inviting them to take part in the study. The criteria for
exclusion were inability to walk around own residence, receiving
physiotherapy at the time of recruitment, or not able to understand the
requirements of the trial. Recruiting took place over a six month
period in 1998.
Trial design
This was a controlled trial, with one year's follow up. The
sample size calculation was based on the proportion of elderly people
who fell once or more in a 12 month prospective study in the
community,4 an expected reduction from 0.50 to 0.30, and
allowance for the multicentre design, the Poisson type distribution of
falls, and a 20% dropout rate. Our study was approved by the ethics
committees of the Southern Regional Health Authority Otago and Southland.
Intervention
The three nurses from the exercise centres received the same
training and implemented the same exercise programme as in the
accompanying article.5 For the delivery of the programme the nurses were employed part time on research funding. In addition to
supervision by the physiotherapist the nurses attended team meetings at
the supervising centre on four occasions to discuss progress and any
problems and to compare experiences.
Measurement of falls and injuries and health status
Fall events were defined and monitored for one year and the
severity of injury categorised as described in the accompanying
article.5 The nurse or independent assessor in each centre
telephoned participants to record the circumstances of the falls and
any injuries or resource use as a result of the falls. The SF-12
questionnaire was used to estimate self perceived health status at
entry to the trial.6
| |
Methods used in economic evaluation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The methods used in the economic evaluation are detailed in the accompanying paper.5 We report costs in 1998 New Zealand dollars, exclusive of government goods and services tax.
Assuming that participants keep exercising, the benefits of the exercise programme would extend past the time individuals participated in the trial, but the extent of this benefit and longer term compliance rates are uncertain. We calculated cost effectiveness ratios for the duration of the trial only.
Statistical analysis
We analysed data with the same methods as in the accompanying
article.5 Four participants in the exercise centres
completed the baseline assessments but did not receive any visits (one
died, a spouse died, and two were no longer interested). The mean (SD)
time between the baseline assessment and the first home visit for the
exercise programme was 17.0 (14.0) days. We analysed data on an
intention to treat basis with Stata Release 6 and SPSS
6.1.1.
|
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Trial participants and follow up
The mean (SD) age of participants was 83.7 (2.9) years, and ages
ranged from 79 to 94 years. The participants in both groups were well
matched on characteristics at entry to the trial (table
1).
|
Falls and fall related injuries
Table 2 shows the actual and standardised numbers of falls
and the numbers of falls resulting in injuries during the trial. A
significant reduction was found in the numbers of falls during the
trial for the exercise centres compared with the control centres
(incidence rate ratio from negative binomial regression model 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.84). This 30% reduction in falls
was similar for both men and women.
|
Economic evaluation
Costs of implementing the exercise programme
The exercise
programme cost $NZ137 878 or $NZ418 per person to deliver to the 330 participants in the exercise centres for one year.
Overall, 71 of
303 (23%) falls resulted in the use of healthcare services (table 2).
No significant difference was found in the numbers of hospital admissions as a result of a fall injury (12 in total) between the
exercise and control centres. The difference between the actual cost of
these hospital admissions for participants from the exercise ($NZ50 470) and control centre ($NZ10 993) as a result of a fall was
not significant (P=0.584).
Cost effectiveness measures
The incremental cost per fall
prevented was $NZ1519 (table 3). Estimates for the cost per fall with
an injury prevented ranged from $NZ2553 to $NZ4255 for the different
cost scenarios. Table 4 shows the incremental costs of
implementing the exercise
programme.
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Falls can be reduced in men and women aged 80 years and older receiving an exercise programme from trained nurses based in general practices, and this is achievable in usual clinical practice. 2 5 It was more difficult to gauge whether the exercise programme gave value for money. The programme cost a similar amount per person to deliver as the first pragmatic trial involving a district nurse prescribing the programme, and there were similar estimates for cost effectiveness ratios when the costs of implementing the programme only were considered. Hospital costs were not reduced, however, and therefore the programme was not as cost effective as the first trial. This may be due to the sample sizes used, which were based on falls and not on injury rates, and the fact that the data for hospital costs have a skewed distribution. The participants from the exercise centres had fewer moderate injuries as a result of a fall, but no differences were found in the numbers of serious injuries between the two groups.
For the trial of the exercise programme in a research setting, the programme was delivered by a physiotherapist.2 We conclude that trained nurses from general practices can also implement the programme successfully. The implementation of the programme worked well from a general practice setting, and because it took up only half the nurses' time it fitted in with other work. Nurses should be trained and supervised by a suitably qualified physiotherapist.
The earlier a health problem can be identified the better. In both our pragmatic trials the nurses acted as patient advocates on several occasions and were able to identify health concerns during the home visits and to deal with them before they became a major problem. It was reassuring that death rates were lower, although not significantly so, in the exercise groups than in the control groups in both trials.
Methodological issues
As this was a trial of implementing a programme in the
community, we used control and exercise centres rather than a
randomised controlled design. The pragmatic design ensured that the
delivery of the intervention matched as closely as possible what might
occur in normal practice using practice nurses. This also avoided
contamination as increased public awareness may lead to sharing of
information. It is possible that the variable success of the programme
in the different centres was influenced by the expertise of the instructor.
Conclusions
Exercise programmes can prevent falls in elderly people living
in the community.8 We have also shown that withdrawing psychotropic drugs can prevent falls in people taking these
drugs.9 Another intervention delivered at home by a health
professional
assessment and modification of environmental hazards
has
been shown to reduce falls in elderly people who were at increased risk
of falling.10 A home based programme that was individually
targeted and multifactorial also reduced falls in elderly
people.11
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the participants; the doctors and their receptionists; Jo Halkett, Rachel Hall, and Jan Muir, exercise instructors; Lenore Armstrong, independent assessor; Graham Arnold, decision support coordinator, HealthCare Otago; Shona Ellis, clinical costing, Southern Health; Irene Henderson, manager, Gore Hospital; Peter Herbison, statistician; Professor Murray Tilyard and the General Practice Research Unit; and Sheila Williams, statistician.
All authors contributed to the study or protocol design, or both, interpreted the data, and wrote the paper. AJC directed the project. MCR managed the project and the data gathering, analysed and interpreted the data, and wrote the paper. MMG trained and supervised the exercise instructor. ND and Dr Paul Scuffham advised on the economic evaluation. RM advised on health promotion aspects. AJC and MCR will act as guarantors for the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: This project was funded by Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand, the Health Research Council, and Lottery Grants Board, New Zealand. MMG was part funded by a Trustbank Otago Community Trust medical research fellowship.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Haynes B.
Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it?
BMJ
1999;
319:
652-653 |
| 2. |
Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Norton RN, Tilyard MW, Buchner DM.
Randomised controlled trial of a general practice programme of home based exercise to prevent falls in elderly women.
BMJ
1997;
315:
1065-1069 |
| 3. |
Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Norton RN, Buchner DM.
Falls prevention over 2 years: a randomized controlled trial in women 80 years and older.
Age Ageing
1999;
28:
513-518 |
| 4. | Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF. Risk factors for falls in a community-based prospective study of people 70 years and older. J Gerontol Med Sci 1989; 44: 112-117M. |
| 5. |
Robertson MC, Devlin N, Gardner MM, Campbell AJ.
Effectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls. 1: Randomised controlled trial.
BMJ
2001;
322:
697-701 |
| 6. |
Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, et al.
A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?
J Public Health Med
1997;
19:
179-186 |
| 7. | StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata, 1999. |
| 8. |
Gardner MM, Robertson MC, Campbell AJ.
Exercise in preventing falls and fall related injuries in older people: a review of randomised controlled trials.
Br J Sports Med
2000;
34:
7-17 |
| 9. | Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Norton RN, Buchner DM. Psychotropic medication withdrawal and a home-based exercise program to prevent falls: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 850-853[Medline]. |
| 10. | Cumming RG, Thomas M, Szonyi G, Salkeld G, O'Neill E, Westbury C, et al. Home visits by an occupational therapist for assessment and modification of environmental hazards: a randomized trial of falls prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 1397-1402[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Tinetti ME, Baker DI, McAvay G, Claus EB, Garrett P, Gottschalk M, et al.
A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community.
N Engl J Med
1994;
331:
821-827 |
(Accepted 19 December 2000)
75 with severe visual impairment: the VIP trial