Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Angela Burnett Medical Foundation for the
Care of Victims of Torture, London NW5 3EJ
Correspondence to: A Burnett a.c.burnett{at}qmw.ac.uk
This final article in the series describes how torture and
organised violence may affect the health of survivors. A definition of
torture, often used for asylum purposes, is shown in the box. It should
be noted, however, that not all those who employ torture are acting in
an official capacity.
Any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or
mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as: obtaining from him or a third person information or a
confession, punishing him for an act that he or a third person has
committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the
instigation of a public official acting in an official capacity.
United Nations' definition of torture1
Summary points
Torture and organised violence are still prevalent in many
countries and have previously been experienced by some refugees in the
United Kingdom
The problems of survivors of torture and organised violence are not
fully appreciated within the health services
Survivors of torture may not volunteer their history due to feelings of
guilt, shame, or mistrust; consideration must be given to building a
relationship of trust
Much can be done by health workers to alleviate the physical and
psychological difficulties that face survivors
Organised violence is defined as violence which has a political motive. Survivors of torture or organised violence have often been ill treated by government agents such as the army, police, or security forces or other groups perpetrating organised violence, including rebel groups. States have a duty to prevent, investigate, and prosecute cases of torture, but if those who are supposed to do this are themselves the torturers, then there is no official protection. Systematic torture is designed to break the spirit of an individual,2 but in many countries the intention is also to intimidate a minority or dissident group or even an entire population.
Estimates of the proportion of asylum seekers who have been tortured
vary from 5-30%, depending on the definition of torture used and their
country of origin.
3 4
In 1999 approximately 6000 people
(8.4% of all applications) sought asylum in the United Kingdom on the
basis of torture,5 but the actual figure is likely to be
higher than this, as some people do not initially admit to their
experiences of torture. This may be through shame or unwillingness to
disclose sensitive information
about, for example, sexual
violation
to an immigration officer of the opposite sex. Some methods
of torture are common, such as beating, kicking, and slapping. Many
women and some men are survivors of rape and sexual violation. Some
methods are typical of certain geographical areas, such as falaka
(beating on the sole of the feet) in the Middle East and Turkey,
"Palestinian hanging" (suspension by the arms tied behind the body)
in the Middle East and Asia, and in India the ghotna (a pole, placed
across the legs, on which the torturer stands). People may be burned
with cigarettes, sometimes in neat patterns, or given electric shocks.
| |
General considerations |
|---|
The effects of torture are an accumulation of those of physical
violence and conditions of detention (unhygienic cells, inadequate diet) and the psychological consequences of one's own and witnessing others' experiences. When working with a survivor of torture, the
essentials are time, a sympathetic approach, and, if language is not
shared, a trained interpreter who is not a family member or friend. The
initial focus should be on those events to which the patient attributes
the symptoms, and the work should be patient led. A fuller picture may
be built up over a period of time.
| |
Physical effects |
|---|
Fractures and soft tissue injuries
Refugees may have been injured by torture, landmines, or other
violent trauma, and injuries will rarely have received adequate medical
attention, either because none was available or to avoid attracting the
attention of the authorities. Malunited fractures or osteomyelitis may
result, which may benefit from an orthopaedic opinion. Falaka results
in exquisite tenderness but no physical signs. More commonly there are
non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms such as pain and weakness.
Physiotherapy6 and complementary therapies such as
massage, relaxation, non-steroidal analgesics, and techniques to manage
symptoms may produce some improvement.
|
Head injuries and epilepsy
Many people subjected to violence have been hit on the head, and
this sometimes results in epileptiform convulsions. These should be
managed as for all post-traumatic head injuries. Post-concussion
syndromes may present with problems of memory and concentration, and
these symptoms can also be related to stress.
Ears and eyes
Slapping around the ears is common during interrogations. There is
usually a history of pain, bloody discharge from the ears, and
persistent hearing loss. Otitis media may result from traumatic
perforation, and the drum may be scarred.
Sexual violence
As has been mentioned above, many female and some male asylum
seekers are survivors of sexual violence and rape, which has throughout
history been used as a weapon of warfare to degrade and humiliate an
enemy. In many cultures sexual violence and rape are taboo subjects,
and survivors may feel very uncomfortable discussing their experiences.
Survivors of sexual violence should be able to choose the sex of both
their healthcare worker and interpreter, and the latter should not be a
relative. Persistent unexplained distress and anxiety may be due to a
history of sexual violation.
Physical expressions of emotional distress
Survivors of torture and organised violence commonly complain of
symptoms, such as sleeplessness, nightmares, weakness, lethargy,
headaches, abdominal pain, and neck and back pains, which do not seem
to have a physical basis and may last for up to two years. They may
think these are of physical origin and expect investigations and
treatment, but they are often in fact aware of the interrelations
between physical and psychological symptoms. It is preferable to try to
treat these symptoms by non-pharmacological means
the combined effects
of poor concentration and sedatives can make it very difficult to
function properly. Above all, management should be realistic, with no
false reassurances that symptoms will subside quickly (G Hinshelwood,
personal communication, 2000).
| |
Psychological effects |
|---|
As a result not only of past experiences but also because of their current situation in Britain, refugees may show symptoms of anxiety, depression, guilt, and shame.12 These are common responses and need to be viewed in context. Very few such people need specialist psychiatric assessment, although a minority may develop psychological problems or frank mental illness as a result of the stresses of conflict and exile. Some of these have a history of psychological health problems and contact with mental health services.18
For many refugees, restoration as far as possible of their normal life can be an effective promoter of mental health. Most people would rather be active independent citizens than recipients of benefits. Supportive listening is valuable to help people to cope with their memories and with their current situation. It is important not to turn into a medical problem the normal expression of grief and distress concerning highly abnormal experiences. However, symptoms which may need specialist help include consistent failure to function properly, frequently expressed suicidal ideas or plans, marked social withdrawal, self neglect, behaviour or talk that is seen as abnormal or strange within the person's own culture, and aggression towards others.19
One diagnosis that may be made in assessment is that of post-traumatic stress disorder.20 The difficulty with this is that it turns very common reactions into medical problems and assumes a universally valid and applicable model.21 The symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder do not necessarily mean the same in different cultural and social settings, and many people whose symptoms fit its checklist continue to manage their lives and should not be labelled as having a psychiatric condition.22 Symptoms need to be understood in the context in which they occur and through the meaning they represent to the individual experiencing them: distress and suffering are not in themselves pathological conditions.23 There is a wide range of reactions to similar experiences. Someone politically active and familiar with use of torture may be able to make more sense of it than someone to whom detention and ill treatment appear more arbitrary. People who have been unable to explain events and who find what has happened incomprehensible are likely to feel the most helpless and unsure what to do.18 Post-traumatic stress disorder also consigns the traumatic experience to the past, implying that trauma was something experienced before or during flight, but much of the trauma that refugees experience is in their country of resettlement, through isolation, hostility, violence, and racism.24 It is important to recognise that post-traumatic stress disorder is not in itself an indicator of past torture.18
Recovery over time is intrinsically linked to the reconstruction of
social networks, achievement of economic independence, and making
contact with appropriate cultural institutions against a background of
respect for human rights and justice.25 It is important to
acknowledge the resilience of individuals and communities and not label
people with diagnoses that may add to their stigma and powerlessness.
There is a difficulty here, however, as often a medical diagnosis is an
essential passport to scarce social resources, and perhaps even asylum.
| |
Immigration detainees |
|---|
Governments are increasingly detaining asylum seekers in either detention centres or prisons although they are not charged with any crime. Theoretically detention is used either for a short period to confirm identity or for those who are thought likely not to comply with temporary admission terms. In many cases, however, the decision to detain seems to be arbitrary. 26 27 There are no centrally available figures for the number of asylum seekers held in detention annually, only "snapshot" figures for an individual day. On one day in April 2000 a total of 1107 people were detained solely under the powers of immigration officers.28 Similarly there are no figures on the average length of detention, but a third of all such detainees are held for more than six months.29
For an asylum seeker such detention is distressing. Even when detention
establishments make efforts to appear "friendly" the feeling is
that of a prison. The detainees have committed no crime, do not
understand why they have been detained, and realise that the detention
could be indefinite. For those who have been detained in their own
country, the experience of subsequent detention can be devastating.
However comfortable the conditions, the experience of being locked up
will generally evoke powerful memories. Survivors of torture often
describe the feelings of fear and powerlessness caused by the clanging
of cell doors, footsteps in the corridor and uniforms,30
which restimulate their distress.29
| |
Conclusion |
|---|
Victims of torture and organised violence may present with many
non-specific health problems. Some will be a direct result of the
physical trauma, but most will be of mixed physical and psychological
origin. These problems can be dealt with in the same way as any other
patient with the same condition, although cultural and language
difficulties may interfere. Considerable time and patience is required,
but the outcomes can be good. Advice and support is available from
organisations including the Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims
of Torture.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We acknowledge and than our clients and our colleagues, too numerous to mention individually, who have inspired our thinking and have provided valuable comments on our work.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
| 1. | United Nations Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 1984. In: Human rights: a compilation of international instruments. Geneva: United Nations, 1988. www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_cat39.htm (accessed 26 Jan 2000). |
| 2. | Kastrup M. The psychiatric examination of torture victims. Torture 1992; 1(suppl): 22-4S. |
| 3. | Montgomery E, Foldspang A. Criterion-related validity of screening for exposure to torture. Dan Med Bull 1994; 41: 588-591[Medline]. |
| 4. | Eisenman DP, Keller AS, Kim G. Survivors of torture in a general medical setting. West J Med 2000; 172: 301-304[Medline]. |
| 5. | Amnesty International. Annual Report 2000. London: Amnesty International, 2000. www.web.amnesty.org/web/ar2000web.nsf/ar2000 (accessed 26 Jan 2001). |
| 6. | Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Skylv G. The rheumatological examination of torture victims. Torture 1992; 1(suppl): 33-5S. |
| 7. | Forrest D. Examination for the late physical after effects of torture. J Clin Forensic Med 1999; 6: 4-13[Medline]. |
| 8. | Forrest D. Patterns of abuse in Sikh asylum seekers. Lancet 1995; 345: 225-226[Medline]. |
| 9. | Amnesty International. Arming the torturers: electro-shock torture and the spread of stun technology. London: Amnesty International, 1997. |
| 10. |
Groth AN, Burgess AW.
Male rape: offenders and victims.
Am J Psychiatry
1980;
137:
806-810 |
| 11. | Hinshelwood G. Gender-based persecution. United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Gender-based Persecution, Toronto , 1997. (EGM/GBP/1997/EP.10.) www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/cn6/1998/armedcon/egmgbp1997-rep.htm (accessed 9 Feb 2001). |
| 12. | Burnett A. Guidelines for healthworkers providing care for Kosovan refugees. London: Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture and DoH, 1999. |
| 13. | World Health Organization. Guidelines for implementing HIV/AIDS counselling. Geneva: WHO Global Programme on AIDS, 1993. |
| 14. | World Health Organization. Record of the 45th meeting of the World Health Assembly. Geneva: WHO, 1992. |
| 15. | Howitt J, Rogers D. Adult sexual offences and related matters. In: McLay WDS, ed. Clinical forensic medicine. London: Greenwich Medical Media, 1996. |
| 16. | Peel M, Mahtani A, Hinshelwood G, Forrest D. The sexual abuse of men in detention in Sri Lanka. Lancet 2000; 355: 2069-2070[Medline]. |
| 17. | Richters A. Sexual violence in wartime. Psycho-sociocultural wounds and healing processes: the example of the former Yugoslavia. In: Bracken P, Petty C, eds. Rethinking the trauma of war. London, New York: Save the Children and Free Association Books, 1998:112-127. |
| 18. | Summerfield D. The impact of war and atrocity on civilian populations: basic principles of NGO interventions and a critique of psycho-social trauma projects. London: Relief and Rehabilitation Network, Overseas Development Institute, 1996. |
| 19. | Gorst-Unsworth C, Shackman J, Summerfield D. Common experiences after trauma. London: Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture, 1996. |
| 20. | American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994. |
| 21. | Bracken P. Hidden agendas: deconstructing post traumatic stress disorder. In: Bracken P, Petty C, eds. Rethinking the trauma of war. London, New York: Save the Children and Free Association Books, 1998:38-59. |
| 22. | Shackman J, Reynolds J. On defeating exile. Openmind 1995; 73: 18-19. |
| 23. | Summerfield D. Addressing human response to war and atrocity. In: Kleber R, Figely C, Gersons B, eds. Beyond trauma. New York: Plenum, 1995:17-29. |
| 24. | Watters C. The mental health needs of refugees and asylum seekers: key issues in research and service development. In: Nicholson F, ed. Current issues of asylum law and policy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998:282-297. |
| 25. | Bracken P, Giller J, Summerfield D. Psychological response to war and atrocity: the limitations of current concepts. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 1073-1082. |
| 26. | Amnesty International. Prisoners without a voice: asylum seekers detained in the United Kingdom, 2nd ed. London: Amnesty International, 1995. |
| 27. | Weber L, Gelsthorpe L. Deciding to detain: how discretion to detain asylum seekers is exercised at ports of entry. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, 2000. |
| 28. | Roche B. Asylum seekers. House of Commons official report (Hansard). 2000 June 28:col 525. www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199900/cmhansrd/ (accessed 26 Jan 2000). |
| 29. | Pourgourides C, Sashidharan S, Bracken P. A second exile: the mental health implications of detention of asylum seekers in the United Kingdom. In: Birmingham: North Birmingham Mental Health Trust, 1996. |
| 30. | Summerfield D, Gorst-Unsworth C, Bracken P, Tonge V, Forrest D, Hinshelwood G. Detention in the UK of tortured refugees. Lancet 1991; 338: 58[Medline]. |
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.