Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Nicholas A Christakis
University of Chicago Press, £19, pp 296
ISBN 0 226 10470 2






Rating: 

When I
visit a teaching hospital and review a seriously ill patient's case
with trainees, I often ask something like, "What do you imagine this
lady's life will be like in a few months?" Until recently, I was
regularly met with an answer like, "I'm glad that's not my job."
As a long term care physician, I found this to be a distressing
response. What could possibly be of more importance to the patient?
Doctors have focused so much on fixing the physiological wreckage that
we have lost our focus on the lives our patients lead.
Nicholas Christakis has compiled and
interpreted the available evidence about how modern medicine deals with
prognosis. Without some estimate of prognosis, he argues, doctors
cannot provide an effective
service to patients whose
lives will be shaped and curtailed by disease. His book reads well, and
it brings together an array of data that he has analysed and
interpreted. In describing our current practices, he shows us how
practitioners in medicine avoid prognostication, convey prognosis
badly, and often believe that giving patients an accurate prognosis can
destroy hope and shorten their lives.
Death Foretold
presents evidence that doctors routinely give overly optimistic
prognoses to patients who may be considering entering a hospice. Future
research efforts will need to confront difficult but illuminating
methodological questions about such prognoses. For example, what do
doctors really believe is at stake when they make a prognosis and refer
patients to a hospice? Christakis has elsewhere proposed a split
between "forecasting," which is kept to the doctor, and
"foretelling," which is shared with patients. He has proposed
that doctors might be more accurate to themselves than they are to patients.
Recently, I have encountered
house staff who no longer simply deflect my questions about their
patients' likely futures. More often now, I hear them wonder, "How
would I answer that?" Giving patients an accurate prognosis is an
important, difficult, and worthy challenge for research and practice.
Joanne Lynn RAND
Center to Improve Care of the Dying, Arlington,
USA
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.