Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Smoking may be important
EDITOR Furthermore, when passive smoking was controlled for in these studies,
active smoking also seemed to be a risk factor for breast
cancer.
2 3
Both long term passive smoking among women who
have never smoked and active smoking almost double the risk of breast
cancer.
2 3
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are found in
tobacco smoke, cause mammary cancer in experimental models, and may
contribute to the development of breast cancer in humans.5 Given the high prevalence of regular passive smoking and of active smoking among women in most industrialised nations, smoking may turn
out to be of considerable importance in the aetiology of breast cancer.
The review by McPherson et al on the epidemiology of and risk
factors for breast cancer states that: "Smoking is of no importance
in the aetiology of breast cancer."1 The authors seem to
be unaware of the mounting evidence that supports the relation between
tobacco smoke and breast cancer. Seven of the eight studies that
examined the relation between passive smoking and breast cancer suggest
that there is an association between an increased risk of breast cancer
and passive long term exposure to smoke among women who have never
smoked; this is particularly true in cases of breast cancer occurring
before menopause.2-4
Cancer Bureau, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and
Control, Health Canada, LCDC Building, PL 0601C1, Tunney's Pasture,
Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0L2
| 1. |
McPherson K, Steel CM, Dixon JM.
Breast cancer epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics.
BMJ
2000;
321:
624-628 |
| 2. |
Wells AJ.
Re: "Breast cancer, cigarette smoking, and passive smoking."
Am J Epidemiol
1998;
147:
991-992 |
| 3. | Johnson KC, Hu J, Mao Y, the Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. Passive and active smoking and breast cancer risk in Canada 1994-97. Cancer Causes Control 2000; 11: 211-221[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Jee SH, Ohrr H, Kim IS.
Effects of husbands' smoking on the incidence of lung cancer in Korean women.
Int J Epidemiol
1999;
28:
824-828 |
| 5. |
Rundle A, Tang D, Hibshoosh H, Estabrook A, Schnabel F, Cao W, et al.
The relationship between genetic damage from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in breast tissue and breast cancer.
Carcinogenesis
2000;
21:
1281-1289 |
Authors' reply
EDITOR Other studies have found no significant relation between smoking and
breast cancer. The effect of smoking on breast cancer in carriers of
the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is also interesting: a recent report found
that participants with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who had breast cancer
were significantly more likely to be non-smokers than participants with
the mutations who did not have breast cancer.4 In a
multivariate analysis, participants with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who
smoked for more than four pack-years (number of packs per day
multiplied by the number of years smoked) had a much lower risk of
breast cancer (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.80, P=0.006).
We have also investigated the effects of smoking on breast cancer. In a
study of 415 symptomatic women there was a significantly higher rate of
lymphatic or vascular invasion in patients who smoked. This is
consistent with a recent report that found that patients who had a
history of smoking had a lower rate of survival than
non-smokers.5
We accept that there is mounting evidence to support the idea of a
relation between tobacco smoke and breast cancer. It has been known for
some time that smoking causes damage to the ducts underneath the nipple
resulting in periductal mastitis, but the exact relation between
smoking and breast cancer seems complex.
Recent studies have shown that there is an association between
smoking and breast cancer, as Johnson points out, but the association
seems to be complex. Certain studies have found an association between
smoking and breast cancer, but others have not. For instance, one study
suggested that the risk of breast cancer in women younger than 45 is
reduced among those who currently smoke and who began smoking at an
early age or who have been long term smokers. This contrasts with the
findings of other studies that have shown that it is exposure to
cigarette smoke when young that is associated with the greatest odds of
developing breast cancer.
1 2
Earlier studies found that
smokers had a lower risk of breast cancer. This finding was confirmed
by a recent study from Quebec which reported that smokers had a
significantly lower risk of breast cancer, particularly those who
smoked cigarettes without filters.3
Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4
2XU
C M Steel
School of Biological and Medical Sciences, But Medical
Building, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS
cms4{at}st-and.ac.uk
1.
Lash TL, Aschengrau A.
Active and passive cigarette smoking and the occurrence of breast cancer.
Am J Epidemiol
1999;
149:
5-12 2.
Marcus PM, Newman B, Millikan RC, Moorman PG, Baird DD, Qaqish B.
The association of adolescent cigarette smoking, alcoholic beverage consumption, environmental tobacco smoke, and ionizing radiation with subsequent breast cancer risk (United States).
Cancer Causes Control
2000;
11:
271-278[CrossRef][Medline].
3.
Ghadirian P, Lacroix A, Perret C, Maisonneuve P, Boyle P.
Sociodemographic characteristics, smoking, medical and family history and breast cancer.
Cancer Detect Prev
1998;
22:
485-494[CrossRef][Medline].
4.
Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, Rebbeck TR, Lerman C, Garber JE, Tonin PN, et al.
Effect of smoking on breast cancer in carriers of mutant BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1998;
90:
761-766 5.
Yu GP, Ostroff JS, Zhang ZF, Tang J, Schantz SP.
Smoking history and cancer patient survival: a hospital cancer registry study.
Cancer Detect Prev
1997;
21:
497-509[Medline].
© BMJ 2001
epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics