Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Shelley Drew Pharmacology
Department, Division of Neuroscience, University of Birmingham,
Birmingham B15 2TT
Correspondence to: S Drew s.j.drew{at}bham.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To determine whether Ginkgo biloba
is effective in treating tinnitus.
Tinnitus, or "ringing in the ears," is a common condition
recognised as a problem by about 10% of the population and considered a major problem by about 0.5%.1 There are no effective
pharmacological treatments for tinnitus. Because tinnitus is considered
to have a number of underlying causes, it is unlikely that a single
treatment will be effective for all patients. Therefore, trials of
treatments for tinnitus need to be capable of identifying treatments
that may help only a subgroup of those with tinnitus. Such trials
should be well controlled and include large numbers of patients.
Previous trials have failed to meet these criteria and have produced
inconsistent and ambiguous results.2
Extracts from the Ginkgo biloba tree have been used in
Chinese medicine for thousands of years. Recently, however,
Ginkgo biloba extracts have become commonly available in
health food stores throughout the United Kingdom; Ginkgo
biloba is one of the top 10 selling herbs in health food
stores in the United States.3 High quality, standardised
extracts from the leaves of the tree have been shown to have
significant therapeutic effect on the symptoms of cerebral
insufficiency, including memory disturbances and other cognitive
deficits such as tinnitus.
4 5
In Germany and several
other European countries Ginkgo biloba is registered as a
drug and is among the top five most commonly prescribed medications: more than five million prescriptions were written in Germany in 1998.6 In Germany, Ginkgo biloba extracts must
meet the requirements of the 1994 German Commission E monograph which
specifies what the extract must contain.7 This ensures
that extracts that are prescribed are almost identical to those which
have been shown to be effective in clinical trials. Extracts sold in
the United Kingdom, however, are not classed as drugs and so are not
required to conform to the standards of those that have been shown to
be effective. Thus, there is a large variety of extracts available.
Determining whether Ginkgo biloba is effective in treating
tinnitus is hindered by the lack of evidence. Prospective studies carried out to determine whether it is effective in treating tinnitus without accompanying symptoms of cerebral insufficiency have provided inconsistent results.2 None the less, Ginkgo biloba
is frequently suggested as a possible treatment for tinnitus in
the press, and many people with tinnitus are using a variety of
products on the basis of limited evidence.
In this study a standardised extract of Ginkgo biloba (LI
1370, Lichtwer Pharma, Berlin, Germany) was used in a large, controlled trial to determine whether it is effective in treating tinnitus. This
is one of the most popular brands sold in the United Kingdom, and the
extract conforms to the requirements of the German Commission E monograph.
Participants
Patients were excluded if They were <18 years or >70 years old They were pregnant or trying to get pregnant They had previously taken Ginkgo biloba extract They had had tinnitus for <12 months They reported that their tinnitus had varied greatly in the six months
before the screening questionnaire They had tried any treatment for tinnitus in the six months before
completing the screening questionnaire (for example, acupuncture,
homoeopathy, hypnotherapy, etc.) They were not generally in good health They were taking anticoagulant drugs or antidepressants They had abnormal blood pressure
Design:
Double blind, placebo controlled trial using postal questionnaires.
Participants:
1121 healthy people aged between 18 and
70 years with tinnitus that was comparatively stable; 978 participants were matched (489 pairs).
Intervention:
12 weeks' treatment with either 50 mg
Ginkgo biloba extract LI 1370 three times daily or placebo.
Main outcome measures:
Participants' assessment of
tinnitus before, during, and after treatment. Questionnaires included
items assessing perception of how loud and how troublesome tinnitus
was. Changes in loudness were rated on a six point scale. Changes in
how troublesome were rated on a five point scale.
Results:
There were no significant differences in
primary or secondary outcome measures between the groups. 34 of 360 participants receiving active treatment reported that their tinnitus
was less troublesome after 12 weeks of treatment compared with 35 of
360 participants who took placebo.
Conclusions:
50 mg Ginkgo biloba extract
LI 1370 given 3 times daily for 12 weeks is no more effective than
placebo in treating tinnitus.
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
Participants and methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References
Participants were recruited through advertisements in the national
press in the United Kingdom and the British Tinnitus Association's
publication, Quiet. Altogether, 1121 participants were
selected from the original 8667 applicants and matched when possible.
The criteria for creating matched pairs were that participants had to
be the same sex, be similar ages (
10 years difference), and the
duration of tinnitus had to be
5 years. The progress of patients
from recruitment through the duration of the trial is shown in figure
1. Exclusion criteria are shown in the
box.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig 1.
Progress of participants through the trial
Exclusion criteria
Methods
This double blind, placebo controlled trial was carried out
entirely by mail and telephone. Patients were contacted by telephone
only to resolve problems or answer inquiries. All procedures were
approved by the local ethics committee (South Birmingham Health
Authority). Calculations of sample size were based on previous
unmatched and categorical data because matched
and ordinal data were not available.8 Assuming that there
would be a significant improvement in tinnitus in 30% of participants
taking placebo, the calculations predicted that it would be necessary
to have 496 patients in each group to show a 10% improvement over
placebo among those taking active treatment with a power of 90% at the
0.05 significance level. The sample size was set to account for withdrawals.
Intervention
The treatment was provided as 252 tablets containing 50 mg of
either Ginkgo biloba standardised extract LI 1370 (containing 25% flavonoids, 3% ginkgolides, and 5% bilobalides) or
placebo (both provided by Lichtwer Pharma). Participants were instructed to take three tablets daily for 12 weeks. The extract and
dose of Ginkgo biloba were chosen on the basis of the
results of previous trials in which this dose of this extract had been reported to be effective in treating cerebral
insufficiency.5 Placebo tablets were identical to the
active tablets in shape, size, colour, and packaging.
Outcome measures
The scales used in the questionnaires were devised for this study
and based on previously validated self assessment scales.9
The questionnaires contained 21 questions about the severity of
tinnitus. These were divided into three groups: measures of the
perceived loudness of tinnitus, ratings of the participant's awareness
of tinnitus and the ability to ignore it, and the impact of tinnitus.
Summary scores were produced for each of the three groups of questions.
These scores ranged from 0 to 12 for measures of loudness, from 0 to 22 for measures of awareness and ability to ignore, and from 0 to 39 for
impact. The sum of the scores in these three groups was the total
summary score. A summary score of 0 indicates that a participant has no tinnitus
that is, it is always silent, can always be ignored, and has
no impact on the participant's life. The maximum summary score of 73 indicates that a participant has tinnitus that is severely
troublesome
for example, it is always very loud, the participant can
never ignore it, and it has a large impact on the participant's life.
The summary scores from all the questions on severity were calculated
and then compared between questionnaires for each participant to
provide a measure of change in severity. The scoring system is shown in
figure 2.
|
4
(treatment has made tinnitus much louder) to 6 (treatment has made it
disappear). Changes in the amount of trouble caused were scored on a
five point scale ranging from -4 (treatment has made tinnitus much more
troublesome) to 4 (treatment has made it much less troublesome). The
score for "no change" was in the middle or near the middle of the
scale. Mean scores were compared between treatment groups.
Additionally, the total number of participants reporting that their
tinnitus had improved was compared between groups.
The questions on change in tinnitus were the primary outcome measures
for the trial, and the scores of tinnitus severity were used as
secondary outcome measures. Because the condition is perceived as a
problem a clinically relevant improvement requires the participant to
perceive an improvement.
Additional questions about the variability of tinnitus, symptoms of
cerebral insufficiency other than tinnitus, compliance with the
treatment regimen, and side effects were also included (fig 2). Summary
scores were again compared between groups. Scores for the variability
of tinnitus ranged from 0 (not at all variable) to 6 (varies hourly).
Scores for cerebral insufficiency ranged from -24 (all symptoms much
worse) to 24 (all symptoms much better). Scores for compliance with
treatment ranged from 0 (instructions not followed well) to 8 (instructions followed well).
Data analysis
Data were analysed on an intention to treat basis wherever
possible. Data entry and initial analyses were carried out by a
researcher blinded to the participant's allocation. Statistical
analysis was carried out using SPSS version 9.0 for Windows except for
the calculation of confidence intervals for proportions; these were
calculated using the equations given by Gardner and
Altman.10 All reported P values are two tailed. Paired
data were compared between treatment groups using McNemar's test and
paired sample t tests. Unmatched analyses did not provide any additional information and have therefore been excluded from this paper.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The number of participants who were excluded or who withdrew from the study is shown in figure 1. Altogether 1121 participants were allocated to treatment (559 to active treatment and 562 to placebo); of these, 956 participants were paired. Characteristics of the paired participants are shown in table 1. Analysis of the side effects of treatment was carried out using data from all 489 matched pairs. However, 26 participants completed no questionnaires so all other analyses were carried out on the remaining 478 pairs in which both members completed at least one questionnaire. The total number of participants was considerably smaller for the matched analyses than for the unmatched analyses. This was because matched analyses required complete data from each member of the pair and was therefore more affected by missing or incomplete data.
|
Outcome measures
The proportion of pairs reporting an improvement in how
troublesome they found their tinnitus at 4 or 12 weeks or a worsening
at 14 weeks with either active or placebo treatment is shown in table
2. There were no significant differences between the treatments at
weeks 4, 12, and 14.
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ginkgo biloba extract LI 1370 had no greater therapeutic effect than placebo in treating tinnitus. In addition, other symptoms of cerebral insufficiency were not significantly affected by the treatment (table 3). The results from this trial are similar to some reports and contrast with others.2 This study differs from other trials in many ways. The main strength of this study was its large size and controlled design. Previous trials involved fewer than 300 subjects and often lacked adequate controls.2 This study achieved its large sample size using a simple approach to data collection (postal questionnaires). A weakness of this approach, however, was that contact with participants was minimal, and participants were probably provided with less support than offered in other trials. The lack of contact with participants may explain the comparatively low response to placebo in this study, but it should not have affected the overall result because it would have affected both groups equally. A matched pair method has not previously been used to study the efficacy of Ginkgo biloba extract, and it was probably an unnecessary and disadvantageous complication of this trial because analyses of the matched pairs used considerably smaller numbers than the unmatched analyses. None the less, unmatched analyses were also carried out (but not presented here), and the pairing process did ensure that treatment groups were similar.
Methods of assessing tinnitus have differed between trials, although most have used a simple, subjective measurement of change in tinnitus, similar to the primary outcome measure used in this study. Our method of assessing tinnitus was thorough, enabled small changes to be identified, and concentrated on the most clinically relevant measurement for this condition (that is, perceived changes in tinnitus). Another strength of this study was that this treatment regimen has been shown to be effective in cerebral insufficiency. Additionally, a measure of the symptoms of cerebral insufficiency was included in the design to determine whether any improvements in tinnitus were associated with improvements in symptoms of cerebral insufficiency.
Most previous trials have used similar treatment doses and been of similar duration, but the methods of administration and the composition of the extract have varied.5 Therefore, it is possible that at least some of the inconsistencies identified by previous studies may be related to the different types of Ginkgo biloba extract that were used. Measurements of other symptoms of cerebral insufficiency have not been made in previous trials. Since neither tinnitus nor other symptoms of cerebral insufficiency were significantly improved in this study, it would be interesting to learn whether trials in which Ginkgo biloba was found to be effective in tinnitus showed that participants had any improvements in other symptoms of cerebral insufficiency. It is tempting to speculate that positive trials have involved a greater number of patients who have cerebral insufficiency and thus improvements in tinnitus were related to an improvement in cerebral insufficiency rather than being a direct effect of treatment.
|
What is already known on this topic
Ginkgo biloba extract has been shown to have therapeutic effects on symptoms of cerebral insufficiency including memory disturbances and other cognitive deficits, such as tinnitus Whether it is effective in treating tinnitus alone (without other accompanying symptoms of cerebral insufficiency) is not clear Previous studies were small, often poorly controlled, and have had inconsistent results What this study addsThis large, double blind, placebo controlled trial found that Ginkgo biloba extract was no more effective than placebo in treating tinnitus alone |
This study has not shown that Ginkgo biloba is effective in treating tinnitus. The extract used in this study (LI 1370 150 mg/day for 12 weeks) seems to be ineffective in treating tinnitus alone, but it may be effective in treating tinnitus in patients who also have other symptoms of cerebral insufficiency. The composition of other extracts or the use of other treatment regimens, or both, might be effective in treating tinnitus alone but there is little evidence of this.
Finally, we would like to raise another issue. Although an effective
pharmacological treatment for tinnitus is unavailable, it may be in
patients' interest to be advised to take a substance that has a
reputation for effectiveness irrespective of the pharmacological value
of the recommendation, particularly if the substance has few side
effects, as is the case with Ginkgo biloba. Should we consider aiming for a placebo response in treating patients with tinnitus until an effective pharmacological treatment is available?
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Mr H Ross for his statistical advice and technical assistance; Dr J Simpson, Mr P Josling, and Dr R Middleton for their help and advice; and members of the Birmingham BTA group and Mr P Hopkins for their administrative help.
Contributors: ED initiated the research. SD and ED designed the study. SD conducted the research and analysed the data. The paper was co-written by the authors. SD is guarantor for the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: This work was funded by the British Tinnitus Association in conjunction with Lichtwer Pharma UK, manufacturer of the extract used in this study.
Competing interests: The study was financed (two years' salary for SD and running costs) by a contract between the British Tinnitus Association and Lichtwer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, who also supplied the Ginkgo biloba extract and placebo tablets.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Davis A, Rafaie EA. Epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Tyler RS, ed. . Tinnitus handbook. San Diego, CA: Singular Press, 2000. |
| 2. | Ernst E, Stevinson C. Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus: a review. Clin Otolaryngol 1999; 24: 164-167[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Winslow LC, Kroll DJ.
Herbs as medicines.
Arch Intern Med
1998;
158:
2192-2199 |
| 4. | Soholm B. Clinical improvement of memory and other cognitive functions by Ginkgo biloba: review of relevant literature. Adv Ther 1998; 15: 54-65[Medline]. |
| 5. | Kleijnen J, Knipschild P. Ginkgo biloba for cerebral insufficiency. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 34: 352-358[Medline]. |
| 6. | Curtis-Prior P, Vere D, Fray P. Therapeutic value of Ginkgo biloba in reducing symptoms of decline in mental function. J Pharm Pharmacol 1999; 51: 535-541[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Blumenthal M, Busse WR, Goldberg A, Gruenwald J, Hall T, Riggins CW, et al, eds. The complete German commission E monographs: therapeutic guide to herbal medicines. Austin, TX: American Botanical Council, 1998. |
| 8. | Duckert LG, Rees TS. Placebo effect in tinnitus management. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984; 92: 697-699[Medline]. |
| 9. | Axelsson A, Coles R, Erlandsson S, Vernon MM, Vernon J. Evaluation of tinnitus treatment: methodological aspects. J Audiological Med 1993; 2: 141-150. |
| 10. | Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Calculating confidence intervals for proportions and their differences. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG, eds. Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: BMJ Publishing, 1989. |
(Accepted 11 October 2000)
Read all Rapid Responses