Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Nancy Reagan
has had one, so has the "Green Goddess" Diana Moran, and the
positive stance to mastectomy taken by these and many other women
has done much to allay the understandable fears of those facing
surgery. However, healthy women identified by genetic testing and
family history as being at high risk of developing breast cancer have
scant information to help them decide about prophylactic
bilateral mastectomy.
A search via the useful generic site Patient
UK (www.patient.co.uk), leading to
www.patient.co.uk/selfhelp/cancer.htm and on to specific breast cancer
sites such as Cancerbacup (www.cancerbacup.org.uk), is frustrating. A
few lines of dry factual information about the reduced risk of breast
cancer after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy are all that can be
found. This week's prospective study on the psychosocial impact of
bilateral prophylactic mastectomy for women with increased risk of
breast cancer (p 76) will be a valuable addition to the literature. Its
message that surgery reduces psychological morbidity and anxiety and
does not have an adverse effect on women's body image or sexual
functioning should appear rapidly on breast cancer sites.
Meanwhile, the best site for doctors to
direct their patients to is likely to be the US site
www.facingourrisk.org. This carries a huge range of links to other
resources and contains illuminating in-depth personal accounts and
photographs of women who have already made the difficult decision about
prophylactic surgery. These bring the reality of decision making alive
and illustrate the important point that opting for surgery
which is performed more frequently in Britain than in the United States, and
hardly at all in France
is a highly personal choice.
Tessa Richards BMJ trichards{at}bmj.com
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+