Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
John Ashton Public Health and Policy
Directorate, NHS Executive North West, Millennium Park, Birchwood,
Warrington WA3 7QN
"Happiness is a warm gun" wrote John Lennon many years
ago, and millions of us still wish he hadn't, for it may have been the
seed that was planted in Mark Chapman's disturbed mind to surface
sometime later as an assassin's hand on the trigger outside the Dakota
buildings in New York.
Yet happiness is an elusive concept, rather like love. As a young
psychiatric registrar struggling to make sense of extreme mental states
including mania and acute schizophrenia, I suggested to my consultant
that if we were to understand the processes involved in hypomanic
states we might do well to study acute infatuation and romantic love.
Not for the first time I was thought to be off the wall. Years later,
however, a Scandinavian colleague lent validity to my musings when he
claimed that being in the delusional state of love lasts seven months,
after which you wonder what all the fuss was about. Seven months is
long enough to bond and for impregnation to occur and is somewhat
analogous to the four to five months that psychotic depression lasts;
it is long enough to withdraw, detach, and move on. This was the same
Scandinavian who explained his law of quantum mechanics as applied to
sin Some years ago Richard Bentall put forward an apparently serious
proposal that happiness itself should be classified as a psychiatric
disorder complete with ICD code.1 The basis for this novel
idea was that happiness is statistically abnormal, consists of a
discrete cluster of symptoms, is associated with a range of cognitive
abnormalities, and probably reflects the abnormal functioning of the
central nervous system. The author dismissed the one objection to this
proposal So what does all this mean for public health, with its focus on the
health of whole populations together with risk factors, risk
conditions, and disease (not to mention indicators, targets, and
population health improvement through the district health improvement
plan, modernisation, and the like)?
If we are to accept the pathological view we will need a strategy for
prevention at a whole population level which minimises the environments
that cause happiness and mirth
namely, that everybody has the same amount of sin; it's just a
question of finding out what they are up to. This reassuring concept
becomes even more reassuring if it is considered that those who claim to have no sins probably sin the most through the misery they cause to
those around them.
that happiness is not negatively valued as scientifically irrelevant.
for example, Everton football club
losing on a Saturday afternoon, comedy clubs, bars, and clubs. We will
need a programme to "dumb down" self esteem and prevent people from
falling in love, going on holiday, or having parties, and we will need
to screen out and treat the people who are at a high risk of being
happy.

(Credit: HELEN PARKER)
View larger version (89K):
[in a new window]
"Happiness is like a butterfly which, when pursued, is always
beyond our grasp, but, if you will sit down quietly, may alight upon
you."
Nathaniel Hawthorne
To some this may seem to be a normal thing to do and an extension of
particular cultural norms prevailing
for example, in some
fundamentalist countries or among the Wee Frees in Scotland. We will
need to be prepared for the ensuing increase in misery, overdoses,
suicides, etc, so we will probably need to increase the training
numbers of psychiatrists and social workers now. But we can draw some
reassurance from the inevitable homoeostatic mechanisms that will kick
in. A colleague who worked in the midwest of the United States
described how the mission tents would periodically come to town,
resulting in wholesale religious conversion and signing of the pledge
for abstinence from alcohol. Before long the wives would find it
intolerable to live with their boring and bad tempered husbands, go
down with depression, and be admitted for psychiatric treatment. The
men, on their own, inadequate, and unable to feed themselves or do the
laundry, would start to drink again, and their wives were able to be
discharged home!
References
| 1. | Bentall RP. A proposal to classify happiness as a psychiatric disorder. J Med Ethics 1992; 18: 94-98[Abstract]. |