Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
"The whole structure of medicine has been based on
the assumption that physicians have the current information and
patients do not. The bottom line is, the consumer will have virtually
all the information the professionals have. This is comparable to the
way communism fell. Once people start getting in good communication you
won't be able to play the game in the same way." So said Tom Ferguson, a US physician who wrote recently for the BMJ
(321:1129). Don Berwick, another US physician, who has been advising
the British government on modernising the NHS, sings a similar song:
"When patients become coequal with their care providers in
controlling care, making decisions, and treating themselves with
coaching, outcomes improve, costs fall, satisfaction rises, and even
physiological measures look better."
This BMJ provides insight into these modern orthodoxies.
Bart Thoonen and Chris Van Weel quote the UK's National Cancer
Campaign at the beginning of their editorial on self management of
asthma (p 1482): "Equipping people with asthma with the tools they
need to manage their condition is as important as writing the correct prescription." Yet, as a qualitative study from Alan Jones and others
shows, this isn't what's happening in the real world (p 1507). Most
professionals oppose self management plans for patients with asthma,
and most patients don't use them. What's needed, suggest the authors,
is plans that are more patient centred and less based on the medical model.
Should relatives be present when a patient is being tested for
brain stem death? The immediate response of many is no, but it's not
long since fathers were kept out during childbirth. Despite debate in
the BMJ, it's also common for relatives to be excluded during resuscitation. Now Janet Pugh and others have asked about the
presence of relatives during testing for brain stem death (p 1505). A
third of consultants and 40% of nurses had experience of the presence
of relatives, and more nurses (84%) than doctors (53%) thought that
witnessing tests would help relatives accept that the patient had died.
There is, of course, a gap between what people say should happen and
what they do; and nobody in this study asked relatives what they thought.
The theme of getting closer to patients and relatives also
surfaces in a study (p 1497) and an editorial (p 1483) on screening family members of patients with heterozygous familial
hypercholesterolaemia and a study of the quality of web based
information on depression (p 1511). It's also thrown up
in a
chilling way
by a study that shows that doctors' economic needs
rather than patient choice lead to high caesarean section rates in
Chile (p 1501).
Footnotes
To receive Editor's choice by email each week subscribe via our website: www.bmj.com/cgi/customalert
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care