BMJ 2000;321:1237-1238 ( 18 November )

Editorials

The importance of injecting vaccines into muscle

Different patients need different needle sizes

Most vaccines should be given via the intramuscular route into the deltoid or the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. This optimises the immunogenicity of the vaccine and minimises adverse reactions at the injection site. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of administering vaccines correctly.1-3 Clinical practice needs to reflect considerations about the right length and gauge of needles used to ensure that those vaccinated get the immunological benefit of the vaccines without local side effects.

Injecting a vaccine into the layer of subcutaneous fat, where poor vascularity may result in slow mobilisation and processing of antigen, is a cause of vaccine failure1---for example in hepatitis B,2 rabies, and influenza vaccines.3 Compared with intramuscular administration, subcutaneous injection of hepatitis B vaccine leads to significantly lower seroconversion rates and more rapid decay of antibody response.1

Traditionally the buttocks were thought to be an appropriate site for vaccination, but the layers of fat do not contain the appropriate cells that are necessary to initiate the immune response (phagocytic or antigen-presenting cells). The antigen may also take longer to reach the circulation after being deposited in fat, leading to a delay in processing by macrophages and eventually presentation to the T and B cells that are involved in the immune response. In addition, antigens may be denatured by enzymes if they remain in fat for hours or days. The importance of these factors is supported by the findings that thicker skinfolds are associated with a lowered antibody response to vaccines. 1 2

Serious reactions to intramuscular injections are rare; in one series of 26 294 adults, of whom 46% had received at least one intramuscular injection, only 48 (0.4%) had a local adverse effect.4 However, subcutaneous injections can cause abscesses and granulomas. 1 5 6 Muscle is probably spared the harmful effects of substances injected into it because of its abundant blood supply.5 Adipose tissue, having much poorer drainage channels, retains injected material for much longer and is therefore also more susceptible to its adverse effects.5 In the case of vaccines in which the antigen is adsorbed to an aluminium salt adjuvant---such as those for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccines---the intramuscular route is strongly preferred because superficial administration leads to an increased incidence of local reactions such as irritation, inflammation, granuloma formation, and necrosis. 2 7 8

The injection technique and needle size both determine how deep a substance is injected. Injection technique involves stretching the skin flat before inserting the needle or pinching a fold of skin before injection, which may necessitate the use of longer needles. To make sure the needle reaches the muscle and that vaccine does not seep into subcutaneous tissue the decision on the size of the needle and injection site should be made individually for each person. It should also be based on the person's age, the volume of material to be administered, and the size of the muscle.9

In a recent study, the thickness of the fat pad above the deltoid muscle of the upper arm was measured in 220 adults (healthcare workers presenting for hepatitis B immunisation) using high frequency ultrasonography.1 A wide variation exists in thickness of the deltoid fat pad, with women having significantly more subcutaneous fat than men. A standard 5/8 inch (16mm) needle would not have achieved sufficient penetration for true deltoid intramuscular injection in 17% of men and nearly 50% of women in the study population.1 For men weighing 59-118 kg and women of 60-90 kg it may be safer to use a 1 inch (25mm) needle. A woman over 90 kg may need a 1.5 inch (38mm) needle.

Healthcare professionals may hesitate to use longer needles on the grounds that they are likely to cause the patient more discomfort. However, skeletal muscle has a poor supply of pain fibres compared with skin and subcutaneous tissue.10

Consideration should be given to needle gauge.11 A wider bore needle ensures that the vaccine is dissipated over a wider area, thus reducing the risk of localised redness and swelling.12

A standard size of needle will not guarantee successful intramuscular injection in all people. When intramuscular vaccine administration is needed to ensure optimal immunogenicity and minimise local reactions, a selection of non-fixed needles (pre-filled syringes that may be provided with a needle fixed on the barrel) should be available to allow healthcare professionals to select a length and gauge of needle appropriate to each patient.

Jane N Zuckerman, senior lecturer

Academic Centre for Travel Medicine and Vaccines, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London NW3 2PF (j.zuckerman{at}rfc.ucl.ac.uk)

Acknowledgments

JZ has been given financial support from several vaccine manufacturers for attending conferences, organising educational programmes, and for undertaking research.



1. Poland GA, Borrud A, Jacobson RM, McDermott K, Wollan PC, Brakke D, et al. Determination of deltoid fat pad thickness: implications for needle length in adult immunization. JAMA 1997; 277: 1709-1711[Abstract].
2. Shaw Jr FE, Guess HA, Roets JM, Mohr FE, Coleman PJ, Mandel EJ, et al. Effect of anatomic site, age and smoking on the immune response to hepatitis B vaccination. Vaccine 1989; 7: 425-430[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Groswasser J, Kahn A, Bouche B, Hanquinet S, Perlmuter N, Hessel L. Needle length and injection technique for efficient intramuscular vaccine delivery in infants and children evaluated through an ultrasonographic determination of subcutaneous and muscle layer thickness. Pediatrics 1997; 100: 400-403[Free Full Text].
4. Greenblatt DJ, Allen M. Intramuscular injection-site complications. JAMA 1978; 240: 524-524.
5. Michaels L, Poole RW. Injection granuloma of the buttock. Can Med Ass J 1970; 102: 626-628[Medline].
6. Haramati N, Lorans R, Lutwin M, Kaleya RN. Injection granulomas: intramuscle or intrafat? Arch Fam Med 1994; 3: 146-148[Abstract].
7. Ipp MM, Gold R, Goldbach M, Maresky DC, Saunders N, Greenberg S, Davy T. Adverse reactions to diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis-polio vaccination at 18 months of age: effect of injection site and needle length. Pediatrics 1989; 83: 679-682[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. American Academy of Pediatrics. Report of the committee on infectious diseases. 24th ed. Washington: AAP, 1997.
9. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). General recommendations on immunization. MMWR 1994; 43: RR-1:6.
10. Greenblatt DJ, Koch-Weser J. Intramuscular injection of drugs. N Engl J Med 1976; 295: 542-546[Medline].
11. Salisbury DM, Begg NT, eds. Immunisation against infectious diseases. London: HMSO, 1996:16.
12. Mayon-White R, Moreton J. Immunizing children. 2nd ed. London: Radcliffe, 1998:28, 43.


© BMJ 2000

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Effect of needle size on immunogenicity and reactogenicity of vaccines in infants: randomised controlled trial
Linda Diggle, Jonathan J Deeks, and Andrew J Pollard
BMJ 2006 333: 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Importance of injecting vaccines into muscle
J R C Seale and Jane N Zuckerman
BMJ 2001 322: 364. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lippert, W. C., Wall, E. J. (2008). Optimal Intramuscular Needle-Penetration Depth. Pediatrics 122: e556-e563 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Schechter, N. L., Zempsky, W. T., Cohen, L. L., McGrath, P. J., McMurtry, C. M., Bright, N. S. (2007). Pain Reduction During Pediatric Immunizations: Evidence-Based Review and Recommendations. Pediatrics 119: e1184-e1198 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Diggle, L., Deeks, J. J, Pollard, A. J (2006). Effect of needle size on immunogenicity and reactogenicity of vaccines in infants: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 333: 571- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hammer, S. J., Backer, H., Schechter, R. (2004). Immunization Injections. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158: 708-708 [Full text]  
  • Seale, J R C, Zuckerman, J. N (2001). Importance of injecting vaccines into muscle. BMJ 322: 364-364 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Exceptions to the rule
Ulrich Heininger
bmj.com, 30 Nov 2000 [Full text]
The importance of injecting vaccines into muscle
Jim Seale
bmj.com, 23 Dec 2000 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Asylum seekers' care

UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview