Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Sally Whittet a The Surgery, London SW4 6TB, b Lambeth,
Southwark, and Lewisham Health Authority, London SE1 7NT, c Communicable Disease
Control, Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham Health Authority, d Department of
Genitourinary Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas's Hospital Trust, London
SE1 7EH, e Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's,
King's and St Thomas's School of Medicine, London SE11 5SP
Correspondence to: S Whittet
binfieldrd.surgery{at}ob.lslha.sthames.nhs.uk
The London boroughs of Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham
have a population of 737 000, which is served by 427 general
practitioners. Data from the unlinked anonymous monitoring programme
coordinated by the Public Health Laboratory Service's communicable
disease surveillance centre show that in 1998 the prevalence of HIV
infection in women attending antenatal clinics in this health authority had risen to 1 in 155.
Transmission from mother to child can be reduced from about 30% to
less than 5% through use of antiretroviral therapy, elective caesarean
section, and avoiding breast feeding; avoiding breast feeding alone
reduces transmission by half.1 HIV antenatal testing
should be recommended routinely in the United Kingdom.2 Screening is cost effective and acceptable to women.
3 4
Women act on a positive test result and take measures to reduce
transmission.5
Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham health authority promotes testing for
HIV infection by midwives as part of routine antenatal testing. General
practitioners are involved in antenatal care, and we felt that it was
important to assess their beliefs and attitudes towards the test before
encouraging their increased involvement.
In January 1999 questionnaires were posted to all general
practitioners in Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham. Questions assessed the subjects' attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, and practice regarding antenatal HIV testing. Non-responders were sent a repeat
questionnaire after two weeks. Non-responders were
significantly more likely to be older, with a median age of 50 years
(interquartile range 40-56), and male (87; 77%). Responders had a
median age of 43 (interquartile range 38-51) and 133 (45%) were women.
A total of 303 (71%) responses were received by April 1999. Most
respondents (251; 83%) had knowingly cared for patients who were HIV
positive. Most (240; 79%) believed that all pregnant women should be
offered antenatal HIV tests. Although 256 (84%) believed that general
practitioners should discuss the test, both before conception and
during pregnancy, only 38 (13%) believed that they always discussed
the test antenatally.
A total of 266 (88%) knew that vertical transmission can be reduced.
There was confusion about the role of breast feeding: 27 (9%) thought
breast feeding should be actively encouraged in women who were HIV
positive and 50 (17%) did not know what advice to give about breast
feeding. Nearly half (146; 48%) believed that a negative HIV test
would adversely affect life insurance.
Most of these general practitioners recognise the importance of
routine antenatal HIV testing and believe they should discuss the test
with their patients. However, this is routine clinical practice for
only a small minority. An encouraging majority are aware that vertical
transmission can be reduced. Of concern is that a considerable
proportion seem unaware that HIV positive women who avoid breast
feeding help prevent transmission of the virus.
Four months before the distribution of our questionnaire, the
directorate of health policy and public health at the health authority
had written to all general practitioners emphasising the need for a
high uptake of HIV antenatal testing enclosing the joint statement from
the Association of British Insurers and the Department of Health, which
states that "a negative and routine antenatal HIV test will not
affect applications for life insurance." Despite this, almost half
the respondents wrongly believed that a negative test will adversely
affect insurance, a belief that might discourage uptake if it is
conveyed to the patient.
Increased participation by general practitioners is needed, but it must
be based on accurate knowledge of means of preventing HIV transmission,
such as avoiding breast feeding, and an awareness that a negative HIV
test result has no effect on life insurance. Well informed general
practitioners can and should play a part in preventing vertical
transmission of HIV.
![]()
Subjects, methods, and results
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comments
References
![]()
Comments
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comments
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Tim Clayton of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who coded and entered the data.
Contributors: RJ participated in the design of the questionnaire and provided comments on drafts of the paper. AdeR initiated the research project, discussed core ideas, participated in the design of the questionnaires and the interpretation of the results, and contributed to the paper. DO'S initiated the research project, discussed core ideas, participated in the design of the questionnaire, the distribution of the questionnaire, data collection, interpretation of the results, and contributed to the paper. PT discussed core ideas, participated in the design and execution of the study, particularly data collection, data documentation, statistical analysis and interpretation, and contributed to the paper. SW (the guarantor) initiated and coordinated the study, discussed core ideas, participated in the design of the questionnaire and the interpretation of results, and contributed to the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Dunn DT, Newell ML, Ades AE, Peckham CS. Risk of human immunodeficiency type 1 virus transmission through breast feeding. Lancet 1992; 340: 385-388. |
| 2. | Department of Health. Reducing mother to baby transmission of HIV. London: NHS Executive, 1999 (HSC 1999/183). |
| 3. |
Postma MJ, Beck EJ, Mandalia S, Sherr L, Walters MDS, Houweling H, et al.
Universal HIV screening of pregnant women in England: cost effectiveness analysis.
BMJ
1999;
318:
1656-1660 |
| 4. |
Simpson WM, Johnstone FD, Goldberg DJ, Gormley SM, Hart GJ.
Antenatal HIV testing: assessment of a routine voluntary approach.
BMJ
1999;
318:
1660-1661 |
| 5. |
Duong T, Ades AE, Gibb DM, Tookey PA, Masters J.
Vertical transmission rates for HIV in the British Isles: estimates based on surveillance data.
BMJ
1999;
319:
1227-1229 |
(Accepted 25 May 2000)
Read all Rapid Responses