Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Andrew Vickers Integrative Medicine Service,
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY
10021, USA
vickersa{at}mskcc.org
Given that many complementary medicine techniques are
defined in terms of a static historical tradition, discussing recent advances in complementary medicine is almost a contradiction in terms.
None the less, few acquainted with complementary medicine would deny
that substantive shifts in its scientific base and organisational
structure have occurred recently. These shifts might indicate that
complementary medicine is becoming more integrated. Integration, as
used here, means that similar clinical, scientific, and regulatory
standards are being applied across all forms of health care. If a list
was written of what patients care about (for example, the clinical
relationship), what researchers feel is important (for example, control
of bias), what clinicians hold critical (for example, clinical
competence), or what matters to purchasers (for example, cost
effectiveness) there would probably be no reference to the historically
and politically contingent concepts of "conventional" and
"complementary" medicine. Integration has obvious implications for
the access to and availability of care. It also implies that clinicians
agree on their respective roles so that patients feel that they are
receiving care as part of a coordinated service. In this article I
review a number of signs that complementary medicine is becoming
increasingly integrated.
This review is largely a personal reflection on recent changes in
complementary medicine. Research has been supplemented by email
discussions with colleagues based in the United Kingdom. The major
source of original research material was the Cochrane Library, an electronic database of randomised trials and
systematic reviews.
The quantity of applied health research on complementary medicine
is growing rapidly, and the quality is improving. The number of
randomised trials of complementary treatments has approximately doubled
every five years,1 and the Cochrane Library
now includes nearly 50 systematic reviews of complementary
medicine interventions.
Much of this evidence involves small numbers of patients and is
of poor methodological quality; however, high quality systematic reviews of complementary medicine have been published recently which
provide a reliable basis for making healthcare decisions. For example,
a Cochrane systematic review of St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) for mild to moderate depression included 27 trials with a total of more than 2000 participants.2 The review
found that St John's wort was superior to placebo and equivalent to tricyclic antidepressants but had fewer adverse effects. Although not
all questions have been answered, particularly those of
safety,3 the review does provide a basis for making
treatment decisions. Another Cochrane review of a botanical medicine
examined the effects of Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) on
benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eighteen studies with a total sample size
of nearly 3000 patients were included. Clear benefits were shown for
urinary symptoms and peak urine flow.4 Other recent, high
quality systematic reviews have found acupuncture to be effective for
pain
5 6
and nausea7 but not for helping
smokers to quit.8
One consequence of the increase in the availability of high quality
data is that guidelines and consensus statements published by
conventional medical bodies have supported the value of complementary medicine. In the United Kingdom guidelines from the Royal College of General Practitioners recommend physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, or osteopathy within six weeks of the onset of persistent uncomplicated back pain.9 The BMA recently published a
report supporting the use of acupuncture.10 In the United
States, the National Institutes of Health have issued consensus
statements supporting the use of hypnosis for pain related to cancer
and the use of acupuncture for pain and nausea.
11 12
Acupuncture, hypnosis, and relaxation techniques are included in
guidelines on the management of pain associated with cancer that have
been published by the US National Comprehensive Cancer
Network.13
Recent advances
The quantity of applied research in complementary medicine is
growing rapidly and the quality is improving
There is good evidence supporting the use of some complementary
medicine treatments
Guidelines and consensus statements issued by conventional medical
organisations have recommended some complementary medicine treatments
Complementary medicine is increasingly practised in conventional
medical settings, particularly acupuncture for pain, and massage, music
therapy, and relaxation techniques for mild anxiety and depression
Osteopaths and chiropractors recently became the first complementary
medicine practitioners in the United Kingdom to be regulated
There is a more open attitude to complementary medicine among
conventional health professionals; this is partly explained by the rise
of evidence based medicine
![]()
Methods
Top
Methods
Applied research
Clinical practice
Training, education, and...
Attitudes
Conclusion
References
![]()
Applied research
Top
Methods
Applied research
Clinical practice
Training, education, and...
Attitudes
Conclusion
References

(Credit: BRIDGEWATER BOOK CO)
Gingko biloba

(Credit: BRIDGEWATER BOOK CO)
Fruit of Serenoa repens
These shifts highlight an improved awareness among researchers of
the importance of complementary medicine and an improved awareness
among complementary medicine practitioners of the importance of
research. These changes have led to increased funding and the establishment of complementary medicine research units at sites of
research excellence. Some of the ongoing research studies are shown in
the box. In the United Kingdom, the NHS recently funded two trials of
acupuncture for treating chronic pain. In Germany, a centre for
research into complementary medicine at the Technische Universitat in
Munich has produced a series of important systematic reviews.
2 5 14
And in the United States, a centre
for research into complementary medicine at the National Institutes of
Health has a $68m (£45m) budget and supports a large number of trials and research centres. The United States also has a large number of
units for research into complementary medicine that are based at
conventional research institutions such as the University of Maryland,
Columbia University in New York, Harvard University in Massachusetts,
and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. These
institutions provide the sort of intellectual and practical
infrastructure essential for high quality research; this support has
long been missing in complementary medicine. For example, a phase I
trial of a botanical cancer treatment planned at Memorial
Sloan-Kettering has been developed by a team that includes experts in
complementary medicine research, a statistician who is an expert in
developing novel designs for phase I studies, an expert in assessing
quality of life, and senior oncologists with extensive experience in
clinical research. The researchers have access to a large number of
patients who are receiving the highest standard of care. These basic
prerequisites for conducting high quality research into complementary
medicine would not have been in place several years ago.
| |
Clinical practice |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Complementary medicine and conventional medicine have traditionally been provided in entirely separate settings. Recently, however, there has been a greater integration between the two, with both often provided at the same site. Currently about 40% of general practices in the United Kingdom offer access to complementary medicine.15 Chiropractic and osteopathy are two of the treatments that are most commonly provided, particularly for low back pain.16 Some practices offer relaxation classes (to improve wellbeing)17 or yoga (to produce feelings of vitality).18 These treatments are generally aimed at patients with mild anxiety or depression or chronic physical complaints for which further treatment options are limited. Massage, which has been shown to reduce scores on scales measuring anxiety19 and to improve sleep,20 is offered in most hospices in the United Kingdom. Acupuncture is widely provided in pain and rheumatology clinics, a development spurred by increasing evidence that acupuncture is of benefit for chronic pain. 5 21 22 Music therapy is a popular complementary treatment in hospitals in the United States, where randomised trials have supported its use for reducing pain and anxiety in the acute setting. 23 24
At the Integrative Medicine Service unit at Memorial Sloan-Kettering, practitioners of massage, music therapy, and acupuncture work on the inpatient wards; patients can be referred by a doctor, nurse, or social worker. These treatments are also offered at an outpatient site along with relaxation, yoga, and t'ai chi classes. It is not unusual to see a patient with severe pain having a foot massage while receiving intravenous methadone or to hear a guitar being played in the room of an anxious and lonely patient.
Although one stimulus for increasing integration has been the increase
in research evidence, the factors which affect the use of complementary
medicine within conventional settings are complex.15
Issues such as public pressure, economics, or the attitudes of key
personnel often play an important part in determining whether
integration occurs.
| |
Training, education, and regulation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There have long been inconsistent standards of training and regulation in complementary medicine. Patients visiting practitioners of complementary medicine have had no guarantees of the competence of a practitioner. The first statutory registration of practitioners of complementary medicine is occurring now and therefore represents a welcome step in the regulation of complementary medicine. A General Osteopathic Council and a General Chiropractic Council have been established and have opened statutory registers in the United Kingdom. After a transitional period it will be an offence for anyone in the United Kingdom to claim to be an osteopath or chiropractor unless they are registered.
Training in complementary medicine is increasingly being provided in academic settings. For example, in the United Kingdom the London School of Acupuncture, which used to provide private tuition, has now joined the University of Westminster to offer a BA degree in acupuncture. Similarly, herbal medicine courses are offered at the University of Middlesex, and postgraduate studies in complementary medicine are available at the University of Exeter. Although academic training in complementary medicine is a new discipline and there are some teething problems, the shift to the university setting provides the opportunity for students of complementary medicine to interact with other students in an environment of critical analysis and debate.
Courses on complementary medicine are also being offered to medical students. These tend to be offered as an option on modular courses and generally provide an academic introduction rather than specific clinical skills. The proportion of medical schools in the United Kingdom offering such courses rose from 10% to 40% between 1995 and 1997.25 A large number of US medical schools have elective classes and seminars on complementary medicine.26
|
Ongoing research studies
Comparative effectiveness of St John's Wort, sertraline, and placebo in depression (Duke University, North Carolina, United States) Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture versus educational intervention (control) for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee who are on standard drug treatment (University of Maryland, United States) Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of acupuncture versus no additional treatment for headache (Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, United Kingdom) Systematic review of spinal manipulation for back pain (Cochrane Collaboration review) Ginkgo biloba versus placebo for prevention of dementia in older people (University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA) |
|
Sources of additional information
Books Zollman C, Vickers A. ABC of complementary medicine. London: BMJ Publishing, 2000. Websites Acupuncture
Chiropractic
Cochrane resources
Herbal medicine
Homoeopathy
Hypnosis
Massage
Osteopathy
Universities
US National Institutes of Health
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Information on unusual complementary treatments
|
| |
Attitudes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Complementary medicine and conventional medicine have not always
coexisted easily. Each has attacked the other. Practitioners of
conventional medicine have used legal sanctions to harass and even jail
practitioners of complementary medicine.27 Recently there
has been a change in the attitude of those practising conventional medicine towards complementary medicine. This is perhaps best characterised by two articles on complementary medicine published in
the BMJ in 1980 and 1999.
28 29
The first
editorial was entitled "The flight from science." It suggested that
some aspects of chiropractic "ought to be as extinct as divination of
the future by examination of a bird's entrails"; acupuncturists'
beliefs were described as irrational.28 In contrast, the
Editor's choice that was published alongside a specially commissioned
series of articles on complementary medicine, described "a new
dawn" and stated that complementary medicine is not "unproved";
the article continued: "increasing evidence shows the effectiveness
of some treatments in some conditions."29 A key element
in this change has been the rise of evidence based medicine, which
emphasises empirical data over theory. Accordingly, what matters is
whether a treatment does more good than harm and not how it happens to
be categorised.
30 31
| |
Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given the increasing amount of data available in some areas of complementary medicine, research is shifting from efficacy trials to more pragmatic studies.32 Acupuncture is a good example of this changing agenda. In a classic trial performed in the mid-80s, patients with migraines referred to secondary care were randomly allocated to treatment with acupuncture or a sham technique to see whether acupuncture was more effective than placebo in relieving pain.33 In a trial now in progress patients with chronic headaches seen in primary care are randomly allocated to the usual care offered by a general practitioner or to the general practitioner's care plus acupuncture; this trial was designed to answer the practical question of whether a general practitioner should refer patients with chronic headache to an acupuncturist.34
As it becomes accepted that some complementary medicine can work, the question arises "why does it work?" The popularity of complementary medicine, and at least part of its effectiveness, has been ascribed to the therapeutic relationship. Accordingly, there have been calls for research into the clinical effects of "caring, communication . . . patient empowerment [and the] meaning [of illness]."35 Another area for further basic research is botanical medicines. This area raises important questions about the current emphasis on single compounds in pharmacological treatment. For example, why is St John's wort effective in treating depression? Is its effectiveness due to a single active ingredient, or is there an additive or synergistic interaction between some of its many constituent compounds? Can we design a drug based on St John's wort which works better than the raw botanical?
Discussing St John's wort
recently shown to reduce concentrations of
the HIV-1 protease inhibitor indinavir3
raises the issue
of safety. As more people use complementary medicine and it comes under
increasing scrutiny, safety issues are likely to cause serious concerns
because systematic means of gathering, collating, and disseminating
reports of adverse effects are not fully developed.
The use of St John's wort illustrates another key question in
complementary medicine: how much evidence is enough evidence? And
regardless of how much evidence is published, will any complementary medicine become standard, first line treatment? In patients with mild
or moderate depression, St John's wort has been shown to be more
effective than placebo,2 to have similar efficacy to and
fewer adverse effects than tricyclic antidepressants,2 and
to have possibly greater efficacy and certainly fewer adverse effects
than fluoxetine.36 Yet St John's wort is not licensed in
the United Kingdom and is not widely prescribed. Is it plausible to
think that it ever will be?
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Competing interests: No direct competing interests declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Vickers AJ. Bibliometric analysis of randomised controlled trials in complementary medicine. Complementary Ther Med 1998; 6: 185-189. |
| 2. | Linde K, Mulrow CD. St John's wort for depression. In: Cochrane Collaboration,ed. Cochrane Library. Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2000. |
| 3. | Piscitelli SC, Burstein AH, Chaitt D, Alfaro RM, Falloon J. Indinavir concentrations and St John's wort. Lancet 2000; 355: 547-548[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Wilt T, Ishani A, Stark G, MacDonald R, Mulrow C, Lau J. Serenoa repens for benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Cochrane Collaboration,ed. Cochrane Library. Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2000. |
| 5. | Melchart D, Linde K, Fischer P, White A, Allais G, Vickers A, Berman B. Acupuncture for recurrent headaches: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Cephalalgia 1999; 19: 779-786[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Ernst E, Pittler MH. The effectiveness of acupuncture in treating acute dental pain: a systematic review. Br Dent J 1998; 184: 443-447[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Vickers AJ. Can acupuncture have specific effects on health? A systematic review of acupuncture antiemesis trials. J R Soc Med 1996; 89: 303-311[Abstract]. |
| 8. | White AR, Rampes H, Ernst E. Acupuncture for smoking cessation. In: Cochrane Collaboration,ed. Cochrane Library. Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2000. |
| 9. |
Vickers A, Zollman C.
ABC of Complementary Medicine: the manipulative therapies osteopathy and chiropractic.
BMJ
1999;
319:
1176-1179 |
| 10. | Board of Science and Education, British Medical Association. Acupuncture: efficacy, safety and practice. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic, 2000. |
| 11. | NIH Technology Assessment Panel on Integration of Behavioral and Relaxation Approaches into the Treatment of Chronic Pain and Insomnia. Integration of behavioral and relaxation approaches into the treatment of chronic pain and insomnia. JAMA 1996; 276: 313-318[Abstract]. |
| 12. |
NIH consensus conference. Acupuncture.
JAMA
1998;
280:
1518-1524 |
| 13. | Grossman SA, Benedetti C, Payne R, Syrjala K. NCCN practice guidelines for cancer pain. Oncology 1999; 13: 33-44[Medline]. |
| 14. | Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 1997; 350: 834-843[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Zollman C, Vickers A.
ABC of complementary medicine: complementary medicine in conventional practice.
BMJ
1999;
319:
901-904 |
| 16. | Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Mameren H, Essers AH, Verstegen GM, Hofhuizen DM, et al. Randomised clinical trial of manipulative therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints: results of one year follow up. BMJ 1992; 304: 601-605. |
| 17. | Smith WP, Compton WC, West WB. Meditation as an adjunct to a happiness enhancement program. J Clin Psychol 1995; 51: 269-273[Medline]. |
| 18. | Wood C. Mood change and perceptions of vitality: a comparison of the effects of relaxation, visualization and yoga. J R Soc Med 1993; 86: 254-258[Abstract]. |
| 19. | Fraser J, Kerr JR. Psychophysiological effects of back massage on elderly institutionalized patients. J Adv Nurs 1993; 18: 238-245[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Richards KC. Effect of a back massage and relaxation intervention on sleep in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care 1998; 7: 288-299. |
| 21. | Christensen BV, Iuhl IU, Vilbek H, Bulow HH, Dreijer NC, Rasmussen HF. Acupuncture treatment of severe knee osteoarthrosis. A long-term study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36: 519-525[Medline]. |
| 22. | Deluze C, Bosia L, Zirbs A, Chantraine A, Vischer TL. Electroacupuncture in fibromyalgia: results of a controlled trial. BMJ 1992; 305: 1249-1252. |
| 23. | Koch ME, Kain ZN, Ayoub C, Rosenbaum SH. The sedative and analgesic sparing effect of music. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 300-306[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Winter MJ, Paskin S, Baker T. Music reduces stress and anxiety of patients in the surgical holding area. J Post Anesth Nurs 1994; 9: 340-343[Medline]. |
| 25. |
Zollman C, Vickers A.
ABC of complementary medicine: what is complementary medicine?
BMJ
1999;
319:
693-696 |
| 26. | Bhattacharya B. M.D. programs in the United States with complementary and alternative medicine education opportunities: an ongoing listing. J Alternative Complementaary Med 2000; 6: 77-90. |
| 27. | Inglis B. Fringe medicine. London: Faber and Faber, 1965. |
| 28. | The flight from science. BMJ 1980; 280: 1-2. |
| 29. | An ABC of complementary medicine: a new dawn [Editor's choice]. BMJ 1999; 319(11 September): ii. |
| 30. | Haynes RB. A warning to complementary medicine practitioners: get empirical or else [Commentary]. BMJ 1999; 319: 1632. |
| 31. | Chalmers I. Evidence of the effects of health care. Complementary Ther Med 1998; 6: 211-215. |
| 32. |
Haynes B.
Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it?
BMJ
1999;
319:
652-653 |
| 33. | Vincent CA. A controlled trial of the treatment of migraine by acupuncture. Clin J Pain 1989; 5: 305-312[Medline]. |
| 34. | Vickers A, Rees R, Zollman C, Smith C, Ellis N. Acupuncture for migraine and headache in primary care: a protocol for a pragmatic, randomized trial. Complementary Ther Med 1999; 7: 3-18[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Moerman DE, Jonas WB. Toward a research agenda on placebo. Adv Mind Body Med 2000; 16: 33-46[Medline]. |
| 36. | Schrader E. Equivalence of St John's wort extract (Ze 117) and fluoxetine: a randomized, controlled study in mild-moderate depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2000; 15: 61-68[Medline]. |
Read all Rapid Responses