Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
A few weeks ago my senior partner presented the results
of a paper published in the Lancet1 comparing
the standard Yuzpe method for postcoital contraception (combined
oestrogen and progesterone) with two doses of progesterone only
(levonorgestrel 0.75 mg). Until now the latter has required women to
take large numbers of tablets, but a formulation in two single tablets
has become available in the United Kingdom (Levonelle-2). A large
number of women requesting emergency contraception were studied, 1998 enrolled, and the outcomes were known for 1955 of these. The results seemed to be quite clear cut: fewer pregnancies following the progesterone only regimen and also fewer adverse effects.
The overall pregnancy rate was found to be 3.2% of women given Yuzpe
but only 1.1% of those randomised to levonorgestrel. This represents a
relative risk of 0.36, and the size of the trial meant that the 95%
confidence interval of 0.18 to 0.70 was narrow enough to exclude the
null hypothesis of no difference between treatments. Vomiting was also
significantly less common, occurring in 19% of women given the Yuzpe
regimen and 6% given levonorgestrel (p<0.01).
A single study may be contradicted by other trials, so I decided to
check this out further in the Cochrane Library and found a review
covering emergency contraception which was updated in March
1999.2 The review found two randomised controlled trials which compared levonorgestrel and Yuzpe (including the World Health Organization study in the Lancet). The results of the two
studies were similar, and the pooled relative risk of pregnancy with
levonorgestrel was 0.51 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.84) when compared with
Yuzpe. The pooled risk of pregnancy with the Yuzpe regimen is 3.2%
across the two trials, so the number needed to treat with
levonorgestrel rather than Yuzpe to prevent one pregnancy is 63 (95%
CI 45-193). Similarly, since levonorgestrel induces fewer side effects,
only seven patients need to be given this rather than Yuzpe (95% CI
7-8) to prevent one from vomiting.
Although the new treatment is more expensive, we estimated that
switching to levonorgestrel from Yuzpe would cost about £200 per extra
pregnancy prevented. This compares favourably with the cost and
inconvenience of a termination of pregnancy which would otherwise be
needed after failed postcoital contraception. We have changed our practice.
1 Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet 1998;352:428-33. 2 Cheng L, Gülmezoglu AM, Ezcurra E, Van Look PFA. Interventions for emergency contraception. (Cochrane Review). In: Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2000.
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+