Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Gavin Yamey Manufacturers of infant food are lobbying the World Health
Organization (WHO) to delay any change to its recommendations on the
optimal length of exclusive breast feeding.
The current WHO guidelines advocate complementary feeding at "4-6
months." But many nutrition specialists believe that these guidelines
lead to complementary foods being offered from the age of 3 months, or
even earlier, and that the WHO should change its recommendations to
"about 6 months" (20 May, p 1362). Some member states of the WHO,
together with advocacy groups on breast feeding, hope that a resolution
will be made to adopt this change at the World Health Assembly in May 2001.
A document passed to the BMJ shows that the International Association
of Infant Food Manufacturers is lobbying the WHO at its six regional
committee meetings this year, at the WHO's executive board meeting in
January 2001, and at the World Health Assembly in May 2001.
The lobby message states: "Any action dealing with Infant and Young
Child Nutrition should be delayed until the World Health Assembly 2002."
The document contains "supporting facts" to justify the message,
discussing the importance of an international study on infant growth
being carried out by the WHO, which should be finished by 2002. The
document says: "The current pressure to push through a Resolution on
Infant and Young Child Nutrition at the 2001 World Health Assembly does
not allow sufficient time to conduct the kind of reasoned,
science-based study that WHO had planned."
But many nutrition specialists believe that the scientific evidence
already exists to support a change in the WHO's policy, and that the
growth study was not set up to determine the optimal length of
exclusive breast feeding.
Nancy-Jo Peck, scientific adviser to the Geneva Infant Feeding
Association, the European coordinating centre of the International Baby
Food Action Network, said: "The growth study is not designed to
answer the question about the appropriate age for exclusive breast
feeding or the age to introduce complementary foods."
James Akré, technical officer in nutrition at the WHO, agreed that
the primary aim of the study was not to answer this question, but he
said that passing a resolution on breast feeding in 2001 would be "a
distraction" from the "cyclical mandate to go to the [World Health
Assembly] every two years, on even years, to report on infant and
young child nutrition."
In addition to the growth study that would, he said, "contribute to
an improved understanding of the optimal duration of exclusive breast
feeding," the WHO is conducting a systematic review of the scientific
literature on this optimal duration, which it will submit to the
Cochrane Library in 2001.
Dr David Nabarro, executive director at the WHO, said in a letter to
the BMJ: "WHO seeks to facilitate informed debate [about the optimal
duration] in ways that best respond to the interests of its member
states and their citizens. This may not always reflect the interests of
individuals and organisations who are keen for WHO to be associated
with a specific public health policy recommendation and are impatient
with the structured process of scientific analysis that WHO is expected
to pursue."
The secretary general of the International Association of Infant Food
Manufacturers, Dr Andrée Bronner, said: "Our position is to say
`wait until the international [WHO] recommendations are made.'
Member states belong to the WHO because they believe in its authority."
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+