Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Powerful forces surge through this week's
BMJ (reproduction, scepticism, talking about illness, and
making mistakes) The conventional wisdom is that failure to seek contraceptive advice is
one factor behind Britain's high teenage pregnancy rate. But Dick
Churchill and colleagues show on p 486 that nearly all of the 240 pregnant teenagers they studied had consulted their general
practitioner in the year before pregnancy, and most of them had sought
contraceptive advice. Basil Donovan observes in an editorial that
simply having access to contraception may not be enough to contain
"our relentless drive to reproduce" (p 461).
Three previous trials have shown an effect of homoeopathy versus
placeobo in atopic allergies. In a fourth, on p 471, the same authors
further challenged the hypothesis that homoeopathy is simply acting as
a placebo by including an objective measure. They found that in 51 patients with allergic rhinitis the homoeopathic treatment
significantly improved nasal airflow. They conclude that homoeopathic
dilutions do differ from placebo, though Tim Lancaster and Andrew
Vickers comment that they need to do the large trials "that really
could change thinking" (p 476).
For a person with cancer telling anybody about it is difficult. How
much more difficult it is for a parent talking to her child is explored
by Josephine Barnes and colleagues (p 479). They asked 32 women with
breast cancer whether they had delayed telling their children and why.
Mothers avoided discussion to prevent their children's questions, to
prevent them from being distressed, and because they thought their
children would not understand. Those mothers who had discussed their
illness from an early stage did so because they wanted to keep their
children's trust and also to help alleviate their distress. In his
editorial Duncan Keeley argues that health professionals mustn't let a
perceived lack of expertise inhibit them from doing their best to
assist patients in helping their children to understand painful truths (p 462). He quotes Tisseron Our theme issue on medical error in March has produced many responses
(p 505). Among them is an anonymous writer's rather bitter
observation that blaming individuals is more emotionally satisfying
than targeting institutions (p 507).
The reason for our double issue is not because most people in Western
Europe seem to be on their holidays but simply because this year has 53 Saturdays. Nevertheless, for those who are on holiday now is a good
time to think up a sketch for our Christmas review (p 466).
which is perhaps as well because, being a double
issue, it will have to serve for two.
it is better to talk badly about such things than not to talk about them at all.
Footnotes
To receive Editor's choice by email each week subscribe via our website: www.bmj.com/cgi/customalert
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.