Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Further data are needed
EDITOR However, the threefold rise in carriage rates in the first four days of
term is unexpected. The initial carriage rate (6.9%), as Neal et al
acknowledge, is surprisingly low. In 16-24 year olds, carriage rates in
both outbreak and non-outbreak situations are usually 20% or
higher.
4 5
The sudden increase, in a cross sectional
study, to rates that would be normal for this age group suggests
potential confounding. Carriage has been clearly documented to vary
with age and sex,
2 4 5
yet no comparison of the age and
sex of the four groups is presented, nor are these variables included
in the regression analysis that examines risk factors for carriage.
The study shows that virulent C2a strains are acquired more
rapidly over the term than other strains. Rapid acquisition of disease
causing strains was also suggested in the outbreaks at Cardiff and
Southampton universities, where low carriage rates of serogroup C
outbreak organisms were documented along with very close clustering of
the cases in time.2 If a rapid increase in carriage does
occur at the start of term, and particularly if virulent C2a strains
are transmitted preferentially as the study suggests, one would expect
the rise in carriage to be accompanied by a dramatic peak in disease
incidence in the first one to two weeks of term. Yet the peak of cases
usually occurs after a delay of three to five weeks.1 The
alternative, albeit unlikely, explanation is that acquisition of
different strains varies over time, with acquisition of C2a strains
occurring later.
It would be useful if Neal et al could present further analysis to help
rule out confounding as an explanation for the study's unexpected
initial findings. Although variation in sensitivity of swabbing is
difficult to exclude, Neal et al have otherwise done their best to
validate the data. Nevertheless, a cohort study using sensitive
microbiological techniques would be required to confirm whether the
rapid rise in carriage at the start of term is the result of a true
rise in acquisition, whether differential acquisition of virulent and
non-virulent strains occurs, or whether alternative explanations
account for the findings.
The paper by Neal et al documenting risk factors for acquisition
of Neisseria meningitidis among university students helps
further our understanding of the aetiology of outbreaks of
meningococcal disease at universities.1 Several outbreaks have now been linked to bars and nightclubs.
2 3
By
showing that social factors such as attendance at bars influence
acquisition, the study helps substantiate evidence that social
behaviour is important in determining outbreak occurrence.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E
7HT anna.gilmore{at}lshtm.ac.uk
James Stuart
Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (South West), Public
Health Laboratory, Gloucester
| 1. |
Neal KR, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Jeffrey N, Slack RCB, Madeley RJ, Ait-Tahar K, et al.
Changing carriage rate of Neisseria meningitidis among university students during the first week of term: cross sectional study.
BMJ
2000;
320:
846-849 |
| 2. | Gilmore A, Jones G, Barker M, Soltanpoor N, Stuart JM. Meningococcal disease at the University of Southampton: outbreak investigation. Epidemiol Infect 1999; 123: 185-192[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Imrey PB, Jackson LA, Ludwinski PH, England III AC, Fella GA, Fox BC, et al. Meningococcal carriage, alcohol consumption and campus bar patronage in a serogroup C meningocccal disease outbreak. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 3133-3137[Abstract]. |
| 4. | Cartwright KAC, Stuart JM, Jones DM, Noah ND. The Stonehouse survey: nasopharyngeal carriage of meningocci and Neisseria lactamica. Epidemiol Infect 1987; 99: 591-601[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Caugant DA, Hoiby EA, Magnus P, Scheel O, Hoel T, Bjune G, et al.
Asymptomatic carriage of Neisseria meningitidis in a randomly sampled population.
J Clin Microbiol
1994;
32:
323-330 |
Authors' reply
EDITOR The threefold rise was unexpected, but, as mentioned in the
paper, we have repeated this work using a cohort of 229 students who
had swabs taken on their first day on arrival at university and again
eight or 10 days later; this cohort showed a similar increase in
carriage with overlapping confidence intervals. Given this finding,
confounding is an unlikely explanation for the rise. The low initial
carriage rate seen in both studies may reflect the effect of the
prolonged summer holidays when many students disperse from their
established social groups and go away. The increased carriage rates
seen with more social mixing and residence on campus also supports the
notion that the rise we described is real. Given local knowledge of how
students were recruited it is unlikely that confounding could produce
such a large effect.
Sex was controlled for in the analysis of carriage risk factors (table
2), although this was not mentioned. Most of the students were aged 18 or 19 (89.2%), and 97% were aged 21 or younger. Ages were evenly
distributed by day, except during the final day when the students were
slightly older, but restricting the analysis to those aged 18 and 19, or under 22, shows no significant changes in carriage rates. Age was
not associated with carriage, although 0/17 students aged 25 and over
were negative for meningococci.
Many of the isolates from Thursday and Friday towards the end of the
first swabbing round were likely to have been acquired at university,
and these are the rapidly transmitted strains. The general absence of
C2a in the first week and the much higher prevalence in November, when
cases of disease peak,2 suggests that this strain may
spread more slowly than others. The peak of C2a strains happened at the
same time as the peak in cases among university students. In addition,
one of the students who became ill while part of the study had carried
the pathogenic strain for at least seven weeks before becoming
ill,3 which implies that longer periods of carriage before
illness may contribute to the mid-term peak of disease.
Preferential treatment of pathogenic or non-pathogenic strains
could not be assessed as it is not possible to know whether a strain is
pathogenic as disease is rare and there are host organism interactions involved in illness. The final point made in the letter about a cohort study has already been addressed.
We agree with Gilmore and Stuart that social factors are
important in the epidemiology of meningococcal disease among university
students1 and that these contribute to the high rate of
disease seen in this group.2
Department of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology
keith.neal{at}nott.ac.uk
Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam
Department of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology
Nicholas Jeffrey
Department of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology
Richard C Slack
Meningococcal Research Group, Division of Microbiology
Richard J Madeley
Department of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology
Kamel Ait-Tahar
Meningococcal Research Group, Division of Microbiology
Katy Job
Department of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology
Martin C J Wale
Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre Trent
Dlawer A A Ala'Aldeen
Meningococcal Research Group, Division of Microbiology,
University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH
1.
Neal KR, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Jeffrey N, Slack RCB, Madeley RJ, Ait-Tahar K, et al.
Changing rate of Neisseria meningitidis among university students during the first week of term.
BMJ
2000;
320:
846-849. (25 March.)
2.
Neal KR, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Monk P, O'Brien SJ, Stuart J, Ramsay M.
Invasive meningococcal disease among university undergraduates: association with catered halls of residence.
Epidemiol Infect
1999;
122:
351-358[CrossRef][Medline].
3.
Neal KR, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Slack RCB, Kaczmarski EB, White A, Ala'Aldeen DAA.
Seven week interval between acquisition of a meningococcus and the onset of invasive disease. A case report.
Epidemiol Infect
1999;
123:
507-509[CrossRef][Medline].
© BMJ 2000
Read all Rapid Responses