Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
An ancient cultural rite still blights the lives of millions of
women. Judy Jones reports on opposition to a practice that is illegal
in Britain but still continues
The UK crime writer Ruth Rendell and the consultant gynaecologist
Harry Gordon at first seem to have little in common. Baroness Rendell
is a distinguished writer and life peer; Mr Gordon is an experienced
surgeon, living and practising in west London. But they both share an
abhorrence of a 600 year old cultural rite which can not only induce
agonising pain during urination or sex but also cause serious injury,
infection, and death.
Female genital mutilation (commonly described as female circumcision)
is performed across all ages Most girls who undergo the ritual live in Africa and to a lesser extent
in Asia and the Middle East. Increasingly, however, genital mutilation
occurs among migrants from these countries who have settled in the
United States, Europe, and Australia.
Female genital mutilation comes in several forms, the most common being
"type II": excision of the clitoris with partial or total excision
of the labia minora. Some countries, including the United Kingdom,
outlaw the practice, but anecdotal evidence suggests that these laws
are flouted. Few women are prepared to talk about it outside their own
close circle. No one has been prosecuted under the United Kingdom's
Female Circumcision Act of 1985.
At the Central Middlesex Hospital, London, Mr Gordon runs a weekly NHS
walk-in clinic for African women seeking reversals of the mutilation.
Those who attend are mostly Somali women. Most of them have undergone
the type III procedure: excision of part or all of the external
genitalia and stitching of the vaginal opening in order to narrow or
tighten it (infibulation). Mr Gordon recently completed his 100th
reversal (opening up the scar tissue and repairing the labia) at the
clinic, and in 60% of cases all natural functions are restored.
Baroness Rendell visited Mr Gordon's clinic earlier this year. As
patron of the London Black Women's Health Action Project, and an
active campaigner against female circumcision, Baroness Rendell has
been keen to spread awareness of the practice and of the availability
and effectiveness of reversals.
"There's always plenty of fuss about cutting off people's hands in
Iran. But I don't think most people know of the full horror of female
genital mutilation," she told the BMJ. "It's an assault, and quite
as bad as the binding of women's feet in China.
Going through labour is terrible for these women; they mostly have to
deliver by caesarean section. When they menstruate, stale blood gets
left behind. It's a disgusting practice."
A cross party parliamentary inquiry on the practice, behind which
Baroness Rendell has been a prime mover, is due to report in November.
Convinced that some UK health professionals are still carrying out the
operation on request, Baroness Rendell would like to see some
prosecutions under the 1985 act.
She is also pressing for resources to be put into education and
awareness campaigns so that girls and women have a genuine, informed
choice about whether they submit to the procedure or not. "If it is
to be effective, then the approaches would best be made by health
professionals or social workers of their own ethnic group. They won't
talk about it to a white woman," she said.
The reasons most commonly given for female genital mutilation range
from the psycho-sexual and sociological to the mythical and religious.
It is said, for example, to heighten sexual pleasure in men and sexual
desire in women, to increase fertility, to promote hygiene, and to
strengthen social cohesiveness. The women who come to Mr Gordon's
clinic have doubts about the alleged benefits.
"Patients either arrive pregnant or they have just got married," he
said. "Mostly they live in London, but we have had women from Cardiff
and Liverpool. Female genital mutilation is not conventional child
abuse. The parents who put their children through this procedure honestly believe that they are doing the right thing, with 600 years of
tradition behind them. I would rather see it stamped out through
education than through prosecution."
Mr Gordon carried out many more reversals at Northwick Park Hospital,
in north west London, before moving to the Central Middlesex in June
1997. He has been appointed a technical adviser on the practice to the
WHO because of his experience and expertise on the subject. The
organisation has for some years been seeking the cooperation of member
countries to implement effective education and prevention strategies.
Recently, the WHO has expressed concerns that the practice may
contribute to the transmission of HIV through use of one instrument on
several girls.
Mr Gordon is encouraged by international developments but is depressed
by the attitude of many doctors in Britain and the fact that hospital
management sees reversals in terms of short term cost rather than long
term benefit to individuals and taxpayers.
"The sadness is that I had a flourishing clinic at Northwick Park
Hospital. After I left it was gradually downgraded. A lot of the time,
the attitude I come across among the British medical profession is one
of polite disinterest."
on tiny infants, young girls, teenagers,
and women. Up to 140 million girls and women are estimated by the World
Health Organization (WHO) to have undergone the procedure, and each
year a further two million are thought to be at risk of it.

Baroness Rendell: prime mover behind a cross-party parliamentary
inquiry into female genital mutilation
"There's always plenty of fuss about cutting off people's hands in Iran. I don't think most people know of the full horror of female genital mutilation"
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+