Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
They must be given accurate information about their job prospects
The United Kingdom has a long tradition of
training overseas doctors Doctors have travelled to other countries for training for many years.
Doctors who travel overseas for postgraduate training represent only
one feature of "medical migration," which can be temporary or
permanent and is a phenomenon that occurs worldwide for a variety of
reasons. This migration is influenced by a number of factors, including
a lack of training facilities and opportunities in the doctor's home
country, high unemployment among health professionals in the home
country, the shortage of doctors in some developed countries where
there may be many posts that are hard to fill, and the availability of
training placements in developed countries.3 "Medical
migrants" make up a considerable proportion of the medical workforce
in many developed countries, accounting for 30% of NHS staff. The
number of overseas doctors in the training grades has been increasing
over the past 10 years; in England, 29% (4257) of senior house
officers and 27% (3208) of specialist registrars are from
overseas.
2 4
The number of medical graduates from the
European Economic Area who did not qualify in the United Kingdom but
are being trained in the NHS is increasing slowly and accounts for 9%
(1335) of senior house officers and 7% (795) of specialist registrars.4 The NHS is providing training to and
benefiting from the services provided by a substantial number of
overseas doctors.
The finite number of training posts for senior house officers and
specialist registrars are filled by open competition, although a small
number of doctors from overseas are placed directly into posts through
the sponsorship of the Overseas Doctors Training Scheme, which is run
by the medical royal colleges. Direct placement causes particular
concern since it reduces the number of posts that are available through
open competition. The NHS Executive has recently established a panel to
make recommendations on this issue. It will take into account the
service contribution provided by the doctors within structured training
programmes, guidance from the Department of Health on the
recruitment of doctors, equal opportunities legislation and policy, the
arrangements for registration with the General Medical Council, and
current immigration regulations. Options to be considered by the panel
include a wholesale revision of the Overseas Doctors Training Scheme
and the criteria for direct placement and possibly limiting direct
placement to certain specific training placements or stopping it completely.
There is anecdotal evidence that a number of overseas doctors
successfully complete the examination of the professional and linguistic assessment board but find it difficult to get training grade
posts afterwards. In some cases doctors have waited for more than a
year despite applying for many jobs. The supply of training placements
for overseas doctors has been outstripped by the demand. Training
opportunities in the NHS can meet the needs of overseas doctors, which
include basic and higher specialist training and preparation for
examinations. Improvements in managing and delivering training are
needed to maximise the training opportunities; these improvements
could include offering an induction course about the NHS and specific
training placements and assessing the doctor's training needs and
agreeing objectives. Immigration regulations allow overseas doctors to
stay in the United Kingdom to complete postgraduate training to the
standard of the Certificate of Completion of Satisfactory Training.
This certificate is granted by the Specialist Training Authority of the
Medical Royal Colleges and confirms that the doctor has completed
specialist training.
While we await the recommendations of the review panel, overseas
doctors who are considering travelling to the United Kingdom for
training must be given appropriate information from British embassies
and consulates, from the British Council, and from the GMC. The
information must clearly state that success in the professional and
linguistic assessment board examination does not guarantee employment
in the NHS, and that there is competition for placements in training
grades. Overseas doctors should be warned, as those who train in the
United Kingdom should also be, that in certain specialties gaining a
training post at a higher specialist level is intensely competitive.
NHS Executive Trent, Sheffield S10 3TH
(chris.welsh{at}doh.gsi.gov.uk)
that is, doctors who gained their primary
qualification outside the European Economic Area. In this week's
BMJ, Sridhar argues that the United Kingdom should
radically revise its practices in relation to overseas doctors seeking
training posts (p 307).1 Similar issues were raised in
1994.2
| 1. | Sridhar MK. What is the future for overseas graduates? BMJ 2000; 320: 307. |
| 2. |
Richards T.
The Overseas Doctors Training Scheme: failing expectations.
BMJ
1994;
308:
1627-1631 |
| 3. | Mick SS, Pfalher MN. Review and synthesis of the literature on foreign medical graduates/international medical graduates, 1980-1994: report to the Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Rockville, MD: DHSS, 1995. |
| 4. | Department of Health. NHS hospital, public health medicine and community health service medical and dental workforce census: England at 30 September 1999. London: DoH, 1999. |
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+