Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
New agents reduce insulin resistance but need long term clinical trials
Insulin resistance, or more appropriately the reduced
action of insulin, is a prominent defect in type 2 diabetes.1 It is commonly present in people before
diabetes has developed and has even been observed in euglycaemic
relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes.2 It has been
proposed that the reduced action of insulin is fundamental to the
cardiovascular risk factors that are part of the syndrome of insulin
resistance.3 Avoidance of obesity and adequate levels of
physical activity are non-pharmacological cornerstones of the fight
against insulin resistance. Before the introduction of troglitazone in
1997 metformin was the only drug able to sensitise target tissues
(skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and the liver) to insulin.
Troglitazone was the first of a new class of drugs with direct insulin
sensitising actions Thiazolidinediones activate nuclear peroxisome proliferator activated
receptor Troglitazone was available in Britain for a few weeks in 1997 before
its distributor (GlaxoWellcome) withdrew the drug in response to
reports from Japan and the United States of severe and unpredictable
hepatoxicity. In the United States troglitazone was withdrawn in March
2000, when the Food and Drug Administration had received reports of 61 deaths from hepatic failure and seven liver transplants associated with
the drug.7 Troglitazone remains available in Japan and
several other countries.
Last week saw the arrival of rosiglitazone in Europe. This drug,
together with pioglitazone, has been available in the United States
(and elsewhere) since 1999. Pioglitazone is expected to be launched in
Europe at the end of the year. Both drugs have been granted limited
indications in defined circumstances: in combination with metformin in
obese patients with insufficient glycaemic control and in combination
with sulphonylureas if metformin is either not tolerated or
contraindicated (such as in renal impairment).8 These
stipulations contrast with the situation in the United States, where
both drugs are licensed for use as monotherapy (when
non-pharmacological measures have failed). Clinical trials show that
combination therapy using a thiazolidinedione with metformin (the main
action of which is to reduce glucose production by the liver) or a
sulphonylurea (to increase endogenous insulin secretion) is
particularly effective in lowering glucose
concentrations.4 Substantial reductions in insulin doses
have been reported when thiazolidinediones are used in combination
with insulin.4 However, an increased incidence of cardiac
failure was seen in clinical trials in which rosiglitazone was
used in combination with insulin.9 Combination therapy of
rosiglitazone with insulin is therefore contraindicated (although pioglitazone is approved for use in combination with insulin treatment in the United States).
Reassuringly, extensive use of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone has
produced little evidence that it has caused hepatic impairment. However, caution dictates that these drugs are contraindicated in
patients with hepatic impairment or if pretreatment concentrations of
alanine aminotransferase are raised more than 2.5 times the upper limit
of normal.9 Cardiac failure of any degree (past or
present) is a contraindication, and patients with reduced cardiac reserve should be monitored closely.9 There is also a risk of pregnancy in anovulatory women with insulin resistance.
Pioglitazone induces cytochrome P450 isoform CYP3A4, raising the
possibility of drug interactions, such as with oral contraceptives.
The United Kingdom prospective diabetes study shows that better
glycaemic control reduces the risk of microvascular
complications.10 In addition, the trial exposes the need
for additional drugs that are effective against
diabetes.11 The thiazolidinediones have had a faltering
start. An appraisal by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence
(NICE) in the United Kingdom is planned. However, over a million
patients have now been given these drugs, and the continuing paucity of
publications in peer reviewed journals is a concern.12 The
rising global incidence of type 2 diabetes13 suggests that
these drugs could have an important impact on diabetes care.
Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD
(a.j.krentz{at}soton.ac.uk) Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Aston,
Birmingham B4 7ET (c.j.bailey{at}aston.ac.uk) Medical Research Centre, Malmö University Hospital SE-205 02, Sweden (arne.melander{at}nepi.net)
the thiazolidinediones (also known as
glitazones).4 Troglitazone has now been superseded by more
potent agents, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone.
(PPAR-
), which is expressed predominantly in adipose
tissue.
4 5
Insulin action is improved through the
increased transcription of genes in adipocyte differentiation and lipid
and glucose metabolism. Insulin resistance is reduced when assessed
with techniques such as the glucose clamp.1 Blood glucose
concentrations are reduced in concert with a fall in circulating insulin concentration. In addition, thiazolidinediones maintain the
insulin content of
cells of the pancreas in animal
models.4 Improvements in glucose metabolism may be partly
attributable to a reduction in the concentrations of circulating
non-esterified fatty acids and reduced activity of the glucose-fatty
acid (Randle) cycle.4 Patients with insulin resistance
often have elevated serum concentrations of triglyceride with low
concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and this
dyslipidaemia contributes to their increased risk of atherosclerotic
cardiovascular disease.3 Thiazolidinediones increase
the concentration of high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and
rosiglitazone protects against endothelial dysfunction and lowers blood
pressure in insulin resistant and hypertensive rats.4
Although weight gain is common with thiazolidinediones, reports in
humans of a redistribution away from visceral adiposity with
troglitazone are of interest; this depot is closely linked with the
syndrome of insulin resistance.6
Thus, thiazolidinediones might reduce cardiovascular risk.
Clifford J Bailey
Arne Melander
Competing interests: AJK has provided ac hoc consultancy to GlaxoWellcome and Takeda (distributors of troglitazone and pioglitazone, respectively). CJB has provided ad hoc consultancy for SmithKline Beecham (distributor of rosiglitazone) and GlaxoWellcome.
| 1. |
Krentz AJ.
Insulin resistance.
BMJ
1996;
313:
1385-1389 |
| 2. | Ericksson J, Farnssila-Kallunki A, Ekstrand A, Saloranta C, Widen E, Schalin C, et al. Early metabolic defects in persons at increased risk for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 337-341[Abstract]. |
| 3. | Reaven GM. Insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988; 37: 1595-1607[Abstract]. |
| 4. | Day C. Thiazolidinediones: a new class of antidiabetic drugs. Diabet Med 1999; 16: 179-192[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Schoonjans K, Auwerx J. Thiazolidinediones: an update. Lancet 2000; 355: 1008-1010[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Montague CT, O'Rahilly S. The perils of portliness. Diabetes 2000; 49: 883-888[Abstract]. |
| 7. | Bailey CJ. The rise and fall of troglitazone. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 414[Medline]. |
| 8. | Sulkin T, Walker D, Krentz AJ. Contraindications to metformin therapy in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 925-928[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Avandia (rosiglitazone). Summary of product characteristics. Welwyn Garden City: SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 2000. |
| 10. | UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Bailey CJ. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: two new thiazolidinediones. Practical Diabetes Int 2000; 17: 1-3. |
| 12. | Wolfe SM, Lurie P, Sasich LD, Barbehenn E. Information on thiazolidinediones [letter]. Lancet 2000; 356: 254-255[Medline]. |
| 13. |
Orchard T.
Diabetes: a time for excitement and concern.
BMJ
1998;
317:
691-692 |
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.