BMJ 2000;321:252-253 ( 29 July )

Editorials

Thiazolidinediones for type 2 diabetes

New agents reduce insulin resistance but need long term clinical trials

Insulin resistance, or more appropriately the reduced action of insulin, is a prominent defect in type 2 diabetes.1 It is commonly present in people before diabetes has developed and has even been observed in euglycaemic relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes.2 It has been proposed that the reduced action of insulin is fundamental to the cardiovascular risk factors that are part of the syndrome of insulin resistance.3 Avoidance of obesity and adequate levels of physical activity are non-pharmacological cornerstones of the fight against insulin resistance. Before the introduction of troglitazone in 1997 metformin was the only drug able to sensitise target tissues (skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and the liver) to insulin. Troglitazone was the first of a new class of drugs with direct insulin sensitising actions---the thiazolidinediones (also known as glitazones).4 Troglitazone has now been superseded by more potent agents, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone.

Thiazolidinediones activate nuclear peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma  (PPAR-gamma ), which is expressed predominantly in adipose tissue. 4 5 Insulin action is improved through the increased transcription of genes in adipocyte differentiation and lipid and glucose metabolism. Insulin resistance is reduced when assessed with techniques such as the glucose clamp.1 Blood glucose concentrations are reduced in concert with a fall in circulating insulin concentration. In addition, thiazolidinediones maintain the insulin content of beta  cells of the pancreas in animal models.4 Improvements in glucose metabolism may be partly attributable to a reduction in the concentrations of circulating non-esterified fatty acids and reduced activity of the glucose-fatty acid (Randle) cycle.4 Patients with insulin resistance often have elevated serum concentrations of triglyceride with low concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and this dyslipidaemia contributes to their increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.3 Thiazolidinediones increase the concentration of high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and rosiglitazone protects against endothelial dysfunction and lowers blood pressure in insulin resistant and hypertensive rats.4 Although weight gain is common with thiazolidinediones, reports in humans of a redistribution away from visceral adiposity with troglitazone are of interest; this depot is closely linked with the syndrome of insulin resistance.6 Thus, thiazolidinediones might reduce cardiovascular risk.

Troglitazone was available in Britain for a few weeks in 1997 before its distributor (GlaxoWellcome) withdrew the drug in response to reports from Japan and the United States of severe and unpredictable hepatoxicity. In the United States troglitazone was withdrawn in March 2000, when the Food and Drug Administration had received reports of 61 deaths from hepatic failure and seven liver transplants associated with the drug.7 Troglitazone remains available in Japan and several other countries.

Last week saw the arrival of rosiglitazone in Europe. This drug, together with pioglitazone, has been available in the United States (and elsewhere) since 1999. Pioglitazone is expected to be launched in Europe at the end of the year. Both drugs have been granted limited indications in defined circumstances: in combination with metformin in obese patients with insufficient glycaemic control and in combination with sulphonylureas if metformin is either not tolerated or contraindicated (such as in renal impairment).8 These stipulations contrast with the situation in the United States, where both drugs are licensed for use as monotherapy (when non-pharmacological measures have failed). Clinical trials show that combination therapy using a thiazolidinedione with metformin (the main action of which is to reduce glucose production by the liver) or a sulphonylurea (to increase endogenous insulin secretion) is particularly effective in lowering glucose concentrations.4 Substantial reductions in insulin doses have been reported when thiazolidinediones are used in combination with insulin.4 However, an increased incidence of cardiac failure was seen in clinical trials in which rosiglitazone was used in combination with insulin.9 Combination therapy of rosiglitazone with insulin is therefore contraindicated (although pioglitazone is approved for use in combination with insulin treatment in the United States).

Reassuringly, extensive use of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone has produced little evidence that it has caused hepatic impairment. However, caution dictates that these drugs are contraindicated in patients with hepatic impairment or if pretreatment concentrations of alanine aminotransferase are raised more than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal.9 Cardiac failure of any degree (past or present) is a contraindication, and patients with reduced cardiac reserve should be monitored closely.9 There is also a risk of pregnancy in anovulatory women with insulin resistance. Pioglitazone induces cytochrome P450 isoform CYP3A4, raising the possibility of drug interactions, such as with oral contraceptives.

The United Kingdom prospective diabetes study shows that better glycaemic control reduces the risk of microvascular complications.10 In addition, the trial exposes the need for additional drugs that are effective against diabetes.11 The thiazolidinediones have had a faltering start. An appraisal by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom is planned. However, over a million patients have now been given these drugs, and the continuing paucity of publications in peer reviewed journals is a concern.12 The rising global incidence of type 2 diabetes13 suggests that these drugs could have an important impact on diabetes care.

Andrew J Krentz, consultant in diabetes and endocrinology

Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD (a.j.krentz{at}soton.ac.uk)

Clifford J Bailey, head of diabetes research

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Aston, Birmingham B4 7ET (c.j.bailey{at}aston.ac.uk)

Arne Melander, head of NEPI Foundation

Medical Research Centre, Malmö University Hospital SE-205 02, Sweden (arne.melander{at}nepi.net)

Acknowledgments

Competing interests: AJK has provided ac hoc consultancy to GlaxoWellcome and Takeda (distributors of troglitazone and pioglitazone, respectively). CJB has provided ad hoc consultancy for SmithKline Beecham (distributor of rosiglitazone) and GlaxoWellcome.



1. Krentz AJ. Insulin resistance. BMJ 1996; 313: 1385-1389[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Ericksson J, Farnssila-Kallunki A, Ekstrand A, Saloranta C, Widen E, Schalin C, et al. Early metabolic defects in persons at increased risk for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 337-341[Abstract].
3. Reaven GM. Insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988; 37: 1595-1607[Abstract].
4. Day C. Thiazolidinediones: a new class of antidiabetic drugs. Diabet Med 1999; 16: 179-192[CrossRef][Medline].
5. Schoonjans K, Auwerx J. Thiazolidinediones: an update. Lancet 2000; 355: 1008-1010[CrossRef][Medline].
6. Montague CT, O'Rahilly S. The perils of portliness. Diabetes 2000; 49: 883-888[Abstract].
7. Bailey CJ. The rise and fall of troglitazone. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 414[Medline].
8. Sulkin T, Walker D, Krentz AJ. Contraindications to metformin therapy in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 925-928[Abstract].
9. Avandia (rosiglitazone). Summary of product characteristics. Welwyn Garden City: SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 2000.
10. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853[CrossRef][Medline].
11. Bailey CJ. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: two new thiazolidinediones. Practical Diabetes Int 2000; 17: 1-3.
12. Wolfe SM, Lurie P, Sasich LD, Barbehenn E. Information on thiazolidinediones [letter]. Lancet 2000; 356: 254-255[Medline].
13. Orchard T. Diabetes: a time for excitement---and concern. BMJ 1998; 317: 691-692[Free Full Text].


© BMJ 2000

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Thiazolidinediones for type 2 diabetes
N Bradly Glazer, Wayman Wendell Cheatham, Alastair Benbow, Murray Stewart, and Guy Yeoman
BMJ 2001 322: 235. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Maru, S., Koch, G. G., Stender, M., Clark, D., Gibowski, L., Petri, H., White, A. D., Simpson, R. J. Jr. (2005). Antidiabetic Drugs and Heart Failure Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in the U.K. Primary Care Setting. Diabetes Care 28: 20-26 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cheng, A. Y., Fantus, I G. (2004). Thiazolidinedione-Induced Congestive Heart Failure. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: 817-820 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Agostini, M., Gurnell, M., Savage, D. B., Wood, E. M., Smith, A. G., Rajanayagam, O., Garnes, K. T., Levinson, S. H., Xu, H. E., Schwabe, J. W. R., Willson, T. M., O'Rahilly, S., Chatterjee, V. K. (2004). Tyrosine Agonists Reverse the Molecular Defects Associated with Dominant-Negative Mutations in Human Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}. Endocrinology 145: 1527-1538 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Way, J. M., Harrington, W. W., Brown, K. K., Gottschalk, W. K., Sundseth, S. S., Mansfield, T. A., Ramachandran, R. K., Willson, T. M., Kliewer, S. A. (2001). Comprehensive Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Profiling Reveals That Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {{gamma}} Activation Has Coordinate Effects on Gene Expression in Multiple Insulin-Sensitive Tissues. Endocrinology 142: 1269-1277 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Glazer, N B., Cheatham, W. W., Benbow, A., Stewart, M., Yeoman, G. (2001). Thiazolidinediones for type 2 diabetes. BMJ 322: 235-235 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Concerns over the NICE appraisal of the glitazones
Craig J Currie
bmj.com, 28 Jul 2000 [Full text]
Chinese whispers and pioglitazone
John Petrie
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2000 [Full text]
Pioglitazone does not induce cytochrome P450 isoform CYP3A4
N Bradly Glazer
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2000 [Full text]
Clarifications
Murray Stewart
bmj.com, 9 Aug 2000 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview