Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR We used the Yorkshire Cancer Registry (now part of the Northern and
Yorkshire Cancer Registration and Information Service) to investigate
the uptake of chemotherapy in this group of patients over the 15 years
from 1980 to 1994 and determine its effect on survival.
Only 304 (19.8%) of the 1534 patients under 35 received adjuvant
chemotherapy. Their overall five year survival rate was 60% (95%
confidence interval 54.8 to 65.8) compared with 63% (60.6 to 66.0) in
those who did not receive chemotherapy. When 41 patients who presented
with overt metastatic disease were excluded from the analysis the five
year survival rates increased to 63% and 64% respectively. The paper
from Denmark does not give five year survival rates, so we cannot
compare data.
We found no significant improvement in survival for those receiving
chemotherapy in either the individual time cohorts or the group as a
whole. A Wilcoxon (Breslow) test for equality of survivor functions
showed no significant differences between the groups receiving
chemotherapy and those who did not (P=0.31). The rate of chemotherapy
use in this age group increased from 8% in 1980-4 to 17% in 1985-9 and 32% in 1990-4.
Reasons for the lower use of chemotherapy in Yorkshire over this time
may be related to the comparative lack of surgical specialisation and
lack of non-surgical oncology. The Danish patients were all included in
trials in which chemotherapy was used. We previously found large
variations in the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in
Yorkshire,2 all patients with breast cancer population
receiving suboptimal treatment.3 Chemotherapy may have
been given only to those under 35 with conventionally poor prognostic
features, so no overall effect of treatment would be seen.
With the end of high dose chemotherapy as an evidence based option the
optimum type of chemotherapy for this group of patients needs defining.
The paper by Kroman et al on factors influencing the effect of
age on prognosis in breast cancer has important implications for
service delivery,1 increased amounts of chemotherapy being required for young women. The authors imply that only women at high
risk received adjuvant chemotherapy. In all, 36.3% of their 867 patients under 35 were in the low risk group, an excess mortality being
associated with not receiving chemotherapy.
Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield HD3 3EA
jrcs{at}compuserve.com
Bob Haward
University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
| 1. |
Kroman N, Jensen M-B, Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen HT, Andersen PK, Melbye M, et al.
Factors influencing the effect of age on prognosis in breast cancer: a population based study.
BMJ
2000;
320:
474-479 |
| 2. | Sainsbury JRC, Johnston C, Rider L, MacAdam WFA. Does it matter where you live? Treatment variation for breast cancer in Yorkshire. Br J Cancer 1995; 71: 1275-1278[Medline]. |
| 3. | Sainsbury JRC, Haward R, Rider L, Johnston C, Round C. Survival from breast cancer. Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on outcome. Lancet 1995; 345: 1265-1270[CrossRef][Medline]. |
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.