Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Ropinirole may improve function, while minimising involuntary movements
Parkinson's disease, a progressive neurodegenerative
disorder, affects about 1% of the population over the age of 50. While it has no cure, it is the only neurodegenerative disorder with a range
of medical and neurosurgical treatments that substantially reduce
clinical symptoms.1 However, medical management of early Parkinson's disease is controversial because of the potential risks
and benefits to patients. Some clinicians prefer to use levodopa, a
dopamine precursor, since it promptly relieves symptoms. Others
prescribe dopamine agonists and withhold levodopa because of its long
term complications, namely abnormal involuntary movements and potential
neurotoxicity. Inevitably, managing the side effects of
antiparkinsonian drugs becomes a therapeutic focus along with treating
the primary motor abnormalities.1 Extended controlled clinical trials are the only means of obtaining evidence based guidance
on the use of dopamine agonists or levodopa for the management of early
Parkinson's disease.
The results of a recent multisite, five year, randomised, double
blind study comparing the incidence of dyskinesia with levodopa or
ropinirole, a dopamine D2 receptor agonist,2
should sway practitioners towards initial treatment with agonists for
early Parkinson's disease. In contrast to the hypokinesis that
characterises Parkinson's disease, dyskinesias related to
antiparkinsonian drugs involve hyperkinetic choreoathetoid,
lurching, and jerky movements. These movements are thought to be
related to the underlying severity of the disease and alterations in
postsynaptic receptors, as well as pulsatile stimulation of dopamine
receptors resulting from the shorter half life of
levodopa.3 For many patients, these abnormal involuntary
movements are unsightly if not distracting, disfiguring, exhausting,
painful, or frankly disabling. They tend to coincide with peak effects
of each levodopa dose, which is often when the desired relief of the
motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (tremor, rigidity, gait
disturbances, bradykinesia, and akinesia) occurs. Accordingly,
antiparkinsonian treatments that avoid or delay the onset of motor
complications are needed.
Of 268 patients with mild to moderately severe Parkinson's
disease (Hoehn and Yahr stages I-III) in the trial, 179 took ropinirole up to 24 mg/day and 89 took levodopa up to 1200 mg/day.2
If motor symptoms were not adequately controlled, participants were given supplemental, open label levodopa (51% of patients receiving ropinirole and 35% of those receiving levodopa). At the end of five
years, motor deficits were slightly but significantly greater in the
patients given ropinirole, but functional abilities were similar in the
two groups. However, the length of time until dyskinesia developed in
the 25% of patients remaining in the study was 214 weeks for those
given ropinirole and 104 weeks for those given levodopa alone.
Further, dyskinesias developed at a rate nearly three times slower in
the ropinirole treated patients compared with the levodopa only group.
Moreover, the dyskinesias were disabling in 23% of the levodopa
treated patients compared with 8% of ropinirole treated patients.
Before addition of supplementary levodopa, only 5% of patients
receiving ropinirole had dyskinesia compared with 36% of those
receiving levodopa. Thus, although levodopa remains the optimal
treatment for Parkinson's disease, associated dyskinesia is a serious concern.
The results for those patients who completed the five year trial
indicate that initial treatment with ropinirole in early Parkinson's
disease adequately controls symptoms (based on functional abilities)
and delays onset of problematic motor complications. However, since
about half of each group withdrew during the study, neither ropinirole
nor levodopa is an ideal treatment for many patients. Many adverse
effects not involving dyskinesia occurred, causing nearly a third of
participants to withdraw from the trial. Nausea, a leading reason why
patients in our practice stop taking ropinirole, was reported by almost
half of the participants in both groups. However, domperidone, used to
counteract nausea, presumably allowed all but about 5% of participants
who were affected by nausea to finish the trial. Hallucinations were a
more serious complication of ropinirole (17% affected, causing 4% to
quit the study) compared with levodopa alone (6% affected, causing 2%
to quit the study). Other adverse events and variables were similar in
the two groups.
Several other issues warrant consideration in interpreting and applying
the results from this study. Firstly, initial treatment for early
Parkinson's disease is not restricted to levodopa or dopamine
agonists. Amantadine, anticholinergic drugs, selegiline, and
non-pharmacological treatments (such as physical therapy) provide
symptomatic relief in mildly affected patients. Thus, use of levodopa
and dopamine agonists can be delayed until symptoms are clinically
disabling.4 Whether initial treatment with these alternative agents influences subsequent development of motor complications is unknown.
Secondly, the study did not examine the effects of disease severity or
duration on the incidence of dyskinesia and other adverse effects. Such
information would influence treatment, since the six month interim
analysis of the study patients showed that levodopa was associated with
significantly better motor function compared with ropinirole in
patients with more advanced disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage >II) but
that motor function was similar with either drug among less affected
patients.5
Finally, the role of concurrent psychiatric illnesses was not
addressed. Depressive and anxiety disorders affect at least half of
patients with Parkinson's disease but are underrecognised and
inadequately treated.6 Thus, they potentially contribute to the perceived inefficacy of antiparkinsonian drugs and heighten the
risk of premature withdrawal of the drug or the development of
dyskinesias with increases in drug dose.
Despite the remaining unanswered questions, ropinirole seems to be an
effective treatment for early Parkinson's disease. Although levodopa
remains the optimal treatment for Parkinson's disease, ropinirole
provides similar improvements in functional abilities while minimising
abnormal involuntary movements.
Morris K Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of
Excellence, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe
Street, Carnegie 2-214, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
(tdawson{at}jhmi.edu)
Ted M Dawson
TMD and LM are supported by the Morris K Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence (NIH-P50-NS38377) and TMD is supported by the Edward O and Anna Mitchell Family Foundation. LM has received funding from Eli Lilly to conduct clinical trials in Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia and from Zeneca Pharmaceuticals for speaking on psychiatric aspects of Parkinson's disease. Under an agreement between Johns Hopkins University and Guilford Pharmaceuticals, TMD is entitled to a share of sales royalty received by the university from Guilford. TMD and the university also own Guilford stock, and the university stock is subject to certain restrictions under university policy. The terms of this arrangement are being managed by the university in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.
Footnotes
Ropinirole is made by SmithKline Beecham.
| 1. | Olanow CW, Koller WC. An algorithm (decision tree) for the management of Parkinson's disease: treatment guidelines. Neurology 1998; 50(suppl 3): S1-57[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, De Deyn P, Clarke CE, Lang AE, for the 056 Study Group.
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
N Engl J Med
2000;
342:
1484-1491 |
| 3. | Chase TN. Levodopa therapy: consequences of nonphysiologic replacement of dopamine. Neurology 1998; 50(suppl 5): S17-S25[Abstract]. |
| 4. | Poewe W. Should treatment of Parkinson's disease be started with a dopamine agonist? Neurology 1998; 51(suppl 2): S21-S24. |
| 5. | Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, Poewe WH, Stocchi F. Ropinirole in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a 6-month interim report of a 5-year L-dopa controlled study. Mov Disord 1998; 13: 39-45[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Marsh L.
Neuropsychiatric aspects of Parkinson's disease.
Psychosomatics
2000;
41:
15-23 |
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care