Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rebekah Schiff Care of the Elderly, Imperial College School of
Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN
Correspondence to: R Schiff rebekah{at}rspscomp.demon.co.uk
Living wills or advance statements record people's
healthcare wishes in case they are unable to contribute to a decision
concerning their health care in the future, either because of mental
incapacity or because physical disability prevents
communication.1 Elderly people are often in this position
owing to illnesses such as dementia and strokes that cause dysphasia.
The views of elderly North Americans on this subject are well
documented, but there are no reports of the views of older people in
England.
2 3
This study aimed to determine the knowledge
of elderly inpatients in the United Kingdom on living wills and their
healthcare choices should they write such a will.
Seventy four out of 76 medical inpatients approached answered a
questionnaire administered by one interviewer (RS) at two hospitals in
London. All participants were aged over 65 and had a normal score on
the abbreviated mental test. Ethical approval had been obtained.
The participants' mean age was 81 (range 66-97) years; 73 participants
were white and one was Asian (lack of fluency in English precluded
other eligible people). Most lived in independent housing (69;
93%), either alone (44; 64%) or with family members (25; 36%).
One participant was wheelchair dependent; others could walk: 25 (34%)
independently, 26 (35%) with sticks, 22 (30%) with a frame. Half
received home help. Of 69 participants who completed the BASDEC
depression profile, 11 had a score of 7 or above,4 suggesting depression.
Sixty one participants (82%; 95% confidence interval 72% to 90%)
had not heard of living wills, advance directives, or advance statements. Of the 13 people who said they had heard of living wills,
only four correctly defined them; most, as previously
noted,3 thought that the term applied to financial
arrangements after death.
Most people chose relatives as a healthcare proxy:12 (17%; 9% to
27%) chose their spouse and 45 (63%; 50% to 73%) chose
other relatives; friends (n=4 (6%; 2% to 13%) and doctors (n=16
(22%; 13% to 34%) were also nominated. People were specific as to
which family member they would wish consulted. Five of 17 people living with their spouse (29%; 10% to 56%) did not choose them as a
healthcare proxy. They stated it was not fair to expect them to make
these types of decisions; they would be too emotional to be rational and they would not make the decision the participant would have wanted.
Seventeen (24%; 14% to 35%) had discussed issues surrounding medical
care with their proposed healthcare proxies.
Our elderly participants found many disabilities unacceptable, stating
that they preferred "comfort only" care, even if they might die, to
active treatment (table). The single condition most feared was advanced
dementia (n=56 (78%; 66% to 87%), and this became even less
acceptable when combined with other disabilities. Least feared was
being in a wheelchair (n=17 (24%; 14% to 35%). Women were less
likely than men to request active treatment options: geometric mean
(out of 27 disabilities) 3.2 for women, 6.5 for men; ratio
difference=2.0 (1.1 to 3.8; P=0.04) after adjustment for
age.
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
At the end stage of a terminal disease, 68 people (94%) said they would refuse surgery, 67 (93%) artificial feeding, 66 (92%) ventilation, 65 (90%) cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 62 (86%) subcutaneous or intravenous fluids, and 59 (82%) antibiotics.
Fifty participants (74%) expressed interest in writing a living will,
most commonly because their views would be known (25; 34%) and to
relieve the burden of decisions on their family (22; 30%). Women and
men were equally interested in writing a living will.
| |
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite little previous knowledge of living wills, many older
people were interested in the concept. Most elderly people have clear
views on the issues raised in living wills, and 92% indicated when
they would no longer wish their lives to be prolonged by medical
interventions. A living will specially designed for elderly people may
be appropriate and is being prepared.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Pete Sacares for the statistical analysis and help with manuscript revision, and the consultants in care of the elderly at Northwick Park hospital for allowing RS to interview their patients.
Contributors: RS had the original idea for the study and will act as guarantor; RS, CB and CR designed the questionnaire; RS conducted the interviews. RS wrote the first draft of the paper, CB and CR revised the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Sommerville A. Advance statements about medical treatment. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1995. |
| 2. |
Gamble E, McDonald P, Lichstein P.
Knowledge attitudes, and behaviour of elderly persons regarding living wills.
Arch Intern Med
1991;
151:
277-280 |
| 3. | Elder NC, Schneider FD, Zweig SC, Peters Jr PG, Ely JW. Community attitudes and knowledge about advance care directives. J Am Board Family Practice 1992; 5: 565-572. |
| 4. | Adshead F, Day Cody D, Pitt B. BASDEC: a novel screening instrument for depression in elderly medical inpatients. BMJ 1992; 305: 397. |
(Accepted 15 March 2000)
Read all Rapid Responses