BMJ 2000;320:1563-1566 ( 10 June )

Papers

Eating disorders in adolescent females with and without type 1 diabetes: cross sectional study

Jennifer M Jones, research fellow a,  Margaret L Lawson, head b,  Denis Daneman, chief c,  Marion P Olmsted, director d,  Gary Rodin, psychiatrist in chief e. 

a Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2CA, b Division of Endocrinology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8LI, c Division of Endocrinology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2CA, d Ambulatory Care for Eating Disorders, University Health Network, e Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network

Correspondence to: G Rodin gary.rodin{at}uhn.on.ca

    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Objective: To determine the prevalence of eating disorders in adolescent females with type 1 diabetes mellitus compared with that in their non-diabetic peers.
Design: Cross sectional case-control led study.
Setting: Diabetes clinics and schools in three Canadian cities.
Subjects: 356 females aged 12-19 with type 1 diabetes and 1098 age matched non-diabetic controls.
Main outcome measure: Eating disorders meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria.
Results: Eating disorders that met DSM-IV criteria were more prevalent in diabetic subjects (36, 10%) than in non-diabetic controls (49, 4%) (odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 3.7; P<0.001). Subthreshold eating disorders were also more common in those with diabetes (49, 14%) than in controls (84, 8%) (odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.8; P<0.001). Mean haemoglobin A1c concentration was higher in diabetic subjects with an eating disorder (9.4% (1.8)) than in those without (8.6% (1.6)), P=0.04).
Conclusions: DSM-IV and subthreshold eating disorders are almost twice as common in adolescent females with type 1 diabetes as in their non-diabetic peers. In diabetic subjects, eating disorders are associated with insulin omission for weight loss and impaired metabolic control.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Eating disorders are common in late adolescent and young adult women in westernised countries.1-3 These conditions are of particular concern in young women with type 1 diabetes mellitus because of their association with impaired metabolic control and an earlier than expected onset of diabetes related complications.4-6 Aspects of type 1 diabetes and its treatment that have been postulated to increase the risk of eating disorders in young women include the cycle of weight loss at disease onset and subsequent weight gain with the initiation of insulin treatment, the trend towards higher body mass index,7 dietary restraint necessitated by diabetes management, and the availability of deliberate insulin underdosing or omission as a weight loss strategy.8 However, whether eating disorders occur more frequently in females with diabetes than their non-diabetic peers is controversial.

Five controlled, interview based prevalence studies of eating disorders in young women with type 1 diabetes have been reported in which the authors concluded that eating disorders were not more common than in similar non-diabetic populations.9-13 However, these negative findings were based on small sample sizes of young women in the age group at highest risk for eating disorders and consequently had low statistical power to detect significant differences in prevalence. We compared the prevalence of eating disorders in a large sample of adolescent girls with type 1 diabetes to that in a large age matched, non-diabetic female population to determine whether eating disorders are more common among those with diabetes.

    Participants and methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Females aged 12 to 19 years who had had type 1 diabetes for at least one year were identified from diabetes clinic lists at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa, and the Children's Hospital at Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation in Hamilton, Ontario. The subjects were approached by post and telephone call or during clinic appointments. All three diabetes clinics are the main primary treatment centres in their areas for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, providing care for about 70% of potential patients within their catchment areas.

A comparison group of 2494 female students without diabetes was identified at junior high and high schools in Toronto, Ottawa, and Hamilton. The study was described in the same way to both the students and the diabetic patients. The subjects were approached individually whereas the controls were approached as a group during a class. We obtained research ethics approval for each site and informed written consent from each participant and her parent, when required.

Study protocol
All participants completed a self report screening package that included the eating disorder inventory,14 the eating attitudes test (EAT-26),15 and the diagnostic survey for eating disorders (modified).16 Body mass index (weight (kg)/(height (m)2)) was calculated based on self reported height and weight. Participants who were considered to be at risk of an eating disorder because they scored above predetermined cut off levels (box) were asked to complete the eating disorder examination (version 11.5d-modified), which is a semistructured diagnostic interview.17 An additional 15% of the subjects who did not meet the screening cut off were randomly selected for the interview to ensure interviewer blindness. Interviewers could not be blind to diabetes status because the questionnaire contained questions relating to diabetes, which we included for the diabetes sample (for example, on insulin omission for weight loss). Blood was obtained by finger prick from each of the diabetic subjects to measure haemoglobin A1c concentrations. All samples were analysed at the Hospital for Sick Children with the BioRad variant high pressure liquid chromatography assay (normal range 4-6%).18


Screening cut off criteria for interviews

1. Score of >= 15 on drive for thinness subscale of the eating disorder inventory (corresponds to 88th percentile for girls aged 11 to 18 years and 47th percentile for patients with clinically diagnosed eating disorder14)

2. Score of >= 5 on bulimia subscale of the eating disorder inventory (86th percentile for 11 to 18 year old girls and 21st percentile for patients with eating disorder14)

3. Score of >= 20 on body dissatisfaction subscale of the eating disorder inventory (87th percentile for 11 to 18 year old girls and 60th percentile for eating disorder patients14)

4. Total score of >= 20 on the eating attitudes test (recommended cut off score for screening purposes15)

5. Current or past history of binge eating, self induced vomiting, use of laxatives or diuretics, insulin omission for weight loss, or current dietary restriction as assessed by the diagnostic survey for eating disorders

6. History of eating disorder diagnosis or treatment reported in diagnostic survey for eating disorders

7. =<5th percentile of body mass index for age matched females19

Screening measures
The eating disorders inventory and eating attitudes test are self administered questionnaires shown to be reliable and valid screening measures for eating disorders in both diabetic and non-diabetic populations. 14 15 20 21 The eating disorders inventory provides quantitative assessments of specific eating attitudes and behaviours, and the eating attitudes test provides a total score for disturbed eating attitudes and behaviour. Scores on both questionnaires were corrected to discount items that may be scored positively because of diabetes and its treatment (such as "Aware of the calorie content of foods that I eat"). The diagnostic survey for eating disorders is a self administered questionnaire that allows the frequency of disturbed behaviour to be quantified.16 We modified this measure to include diabetes related items such as intentional insulin omission for weight loss. 4 22 The eating disorders examination is a semistructured diagnostic interview that quantifies the symptoms, behaviour, and psychopathology of eating disorders and allows eating disorders to be diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV).23 This interview has good reliability and validity and is currently considered the gold standard for the standardised assessment of eating disorders. 17 24-26 We used a modified version to evaluate diabetes specific behaviour related to eating disorders and to determine if eating behaviour was motivated by diabetes management or weight and shape reasons.

Classification of eating disorders
The classification of eating disorders was based on data from the eating disorder examination interview. Subjects were classified as having a full syndrome eating disorder based on DSM-IV criteria (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or "eating disorder not otherwise specified")23; a subthreshold eating disorder; or no eating disorder. These three categories were mutually exclusive (see BMJ 's website for details of diagnostic criteria).

Based on DSM-IV criteria a minimum of four clinical symptoms over the past three months were necessary for the diagnosis of anorexia or bulimia nervosa. DSM-IV provides broad suggestions for diagnosis of eating disorders not otherwise specified. We operationalised the diagnosis of these disorders more precisely based on DSM-IV criteria and criteria used in previous controlled prevalence studies. 10 11 Subthreshold eating disorders were considered to be milder eating disturbances with a lower frequency or severity of symptoms over the past three months than those specified in DSM-IV.

Statistical analysis
We used chi 2 analyses with Yates's correction for continuity to test the prevalence of clinical and subthreshold eating disorders between the three cities and in the combined samples. Fisher's exact test was used to test the proportions for bulimia. We compared normally distributed continuous variables using Student's t tests and analysis of variance. Scheffe's method for post-hoc comparisons was used to deal with inflated type I error rates when significant effects were found by analysis of variance. Non-normal data were transformed logarithmically and independent t tests were used for comparisons between two groups. Odds ratios and corresponding confidence intervals were calculated to measure the main effect of diabetes on eating disorders. P values <0.05 were considered significant. All P values are two tailed.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Participants and non-participants
In total, 361 of 430 eligible females with type 1 diabetes (84%) agreed to participate in the study. Of the 2494 eligible school girls without diabetes, 1840 (74%) returned signed consent forms and agreed to take part in the study, and an additional 151 (8%) subjects were absent or could not participate because of school tests on the day of the survey. Screening data were collected on 1689 subjects without diabetes. Based on projected numbers of diabetic subjects at each site, we randomly selected a subsample of 1114 age and site matched control subjects (roughly 3:1 ratio).

There were no significant differences between the three clinics or between the schools across the three cities. Therefore, all subsequent analyses were based on two groups---that is, combined diabetes and combined control samples. The mean body mass index was higher in the diabetes group (22.7 (SD 3.8) versus 20.6 (3.3), P<0.001), and the proportion of subjects from higher socioeconomic groups (IV, V, and VI) was slightly higher among control subjects (53% versus 61%, P=0.02) (table 1).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of study participants. Values are mean (SD) unless stated otherwise

Self reported data
Based on the diagnostic survey for eating disorders, diabetic subjects reported more binge eating and less dieting for the purpose of losing weight than controls (table 2). There were no significant differences between the two groups in frequency of self induced vomiting or misuse of laxatives, or on the eating disorder inventory subscales or eating attitudes test total score.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

Table 2. Self reported behaviours of diabetic and control groups based on diagnostic survey for eating disorders (modified)

A total of 48% of the control subjects (n=536) and 52% of the diabetic subjects (n=187) scored above the predetermined screening cut off and were asked to participate in the eating disorders examination diagnostic interview. Three per cent of both the controls (n=16) and the diabetic subjects (n=5) who met cut off criteria did not participate in the interview and were excluded from the prevalence analysis. In order to keep the interviewer blinded to screening status, an additional 98 control subjects (17%) and 38 diabetic subjects (19%) who did not meet cut off were randomly selected to participate in the interview. In total, 220 (61%) subjects with diabetes and 616 (55%) controls completed the eating disorder examination interview.

Frequency of DSM-IV and subthreshold eating disorders
Table 3 shows the frequency of eating disorders based on DSM-IV criteria. Subjects with diabetes were 2.4 times more likely than controls to have an eating disorder (95% confidence interval 1.5 to 3.7). In total, 36 (10%) of the 356 diabetic subjects who completed the study met DSM-IV criteria for eating disorders compared with 49 (4%) of the 1098 non-diabetic controls (P<0.001). Eating disorder not otherwise specified was the most frequent diagnosis, and there were no cases of anorexia nervosa in either group. Diabetic subjects were also 1.9 times (1.3 to 2.8) more likely to have a subthreshold eating disorder than control subjects (49 (14%) versus 84 (8%); P<0.001). There was no significant difference in socioeconomic status between eating disorder groups.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

Table 3. Frequency of DSM-IV and subthreshold eating disorders among diabetic subjects and matched controls

Insulin manipulation and haemoglobin A1c
In subjects with diabetes, deliberate insulin omission was the most common weight loss behaviour after dieting. At screening, 41 (11%) reported that they were currently taking less than their prescribed dose of insulin to lose weight. Fifteen (42%) of the 36 diabetic subjects with an eating disorder reported insulin misuse at the time of screening, which was significantly higher than the proportion in the subthreshold (9, 18%) and non-disordered groups (16, 6%; P<0.001). Diabetic subjects with eating disorders had significantly higher mean haemoglobin A1c concentrations (9.4% (SD 1.8)) compared with those without an eating disorder (8.6% (1.6), P=0.04). The mean haemoglobin A1c concentration for subjects with a subthreshold disorder (9.1% (1.8)) did not differ significantly from that in the DSM-IV or non-disordered groups.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References

This multisite case-controlled study has shown that eating disorders that meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria and their subthreshold variants are about twice as common in adolescent females with type 1 diabetes as in their non-diabetic peers. Among diabetic subjects, the mean haemoglobin A1c concentration was higher in those with an eating disorder than in those without an eating disorder. Such an association between eating disorders and impaired metabolic control may contribute to an increased risk of microvascular complications in young women with diabetes and eating disorders. 4 27

Insulin omission, which is recognised as a purging behaviour in the DSM-IV criteria, was the most common weight loss method after dieting among the diabetic subjects. The availability of this method of weight control, together with the dietary restrictions imposed by the diabetes regimen, may explain why the diabetes group reported less dieting to lose weight than the control group, even though they reported more binge eating.

Our study has some limitations. Although the participation rates of 84% in the diabetes group and 74% in the control group are high, the possibility of selection bias cannot be excluded. In addition, our diabetes sample is not truly population based, and a referral bias to the paediatric diabetes clinics may exist. Finally, a higher proportion of our control subjects were in the upper socioeconomic group than the diabetic subjects. However, we found no statistical relation between socioeconomic status and eating disorder.

Despite these limitations, our study overcomes the methodological difficulties of previous studies. The findings are both statistically and clinically meaningful, and the magnitude of the difference in prevalence is comparable with that found in previous studies with small sample sizes.9-13 The increased prevalence of eating disorders in adolescent females with type 1 diabetes may reflect an interaction between individual and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of eating disorders, similar to that observed in other high risk groups, such as competitive athletes,28 models,29 and ballet dancers.30 However, eating disorders in adolescent females with type 1 diabetes pose a particular health risk in that they are associated with impaired metabolic control and about a threefold increase in the risk of diabetic retinopathy.4 Preliminary research suggests that clinic based interventions may help to diminish disordered eating attitudes in these young women.31 Further study is needed to determine whether intensive diabetes treatment regimens contribute to the increased risk of eating disorders in this population.


What is already known on this topic

Eating disorders in young diabetic women are associated with earlier onset of diabetic complications

Underdosing of insulin is a common method of weight loss among diabetic women

Small studies have found no difference in prevalence of eating disorders among adolescents with and without diabetes

What this study adds

The prevalence of eating disorders was about twice as high among diabetic females aged 12-19 as that among age matched controls

Diabetic subjects with eating disorders had higher haemoglobin A1c concentrations than those without eating disorders



    Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the time and effort of the young women who participated in our study. We also thank David Streiner and Gerald Devins for their statistical and methodological contributions and Susan Bennett and Anne Rydall for help with data collection. Finally, we thank the staff at the participating hospitals and schools, and in particular John Vadermeulen at Hamilton Health Services.

Contributors: The research was developed within the diabetes and eating disorders research group of the University Health Network, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, and the University of Toronto, of which GR, DD, and MPO are senior members. The research formed part of JMJ's PhD thesis at the Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, which was supervised by GR. JMJ conducted the data collection and statistical analysis and drafted the paper. MPO and MLL provided statistical guidance. All authors contributed to the revision and editing of the paper. GR and JMJ will act as guarantors for the paper.

    Footnotes

Funding: Medical Research Council of Canada (MA-12855), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (96/15S(E)), Genesis Foundation, and Toronto Hospital Psychiatry Research Fund.

Competing interests: None declared.

The diagnostic criteria used for eating disorders are given on the BMJ's website


    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Participants and methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Striegel-Moore RH. Etiology of binge eating: a developmental perspective. In: Fairburn C, Wilson GT, eds. Binge eating. New York: Guilford, 1993:144-172.
2. Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ. Studies of the epidemiology of bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147: 401-408[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Polivy J, Herman CP, Pliner P. Perception and evaluation of body image: The meaning of body shape and size. In: Olson JP, Zanna MP, eds. Self-inference process: the Ontario symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990:87-114.
4. Rydall AC, Rodin GM, Olmsted MP, Devenyi RG, Daneman D. Disordered eating behavior and microvascular complications in young women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1849-1854[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Steel JM, Young RJ, Lloyd GG, Clarke BF. Clinically apparent eating disorders in young diabetic women: associations with painful neuropathy and other complications. BMJ 1987; 294: 859-862.
6. Colas C, Mathieu P, Tehobroutsky G. Eating disorders and retinal lesions in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic women. Diabetologia, 1991; 34: 288[CrossRef][Medline].
7. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group. Weight gain associated with intensive therapy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care 1988; 11: 567-573[Abstract].
8. Rodin GM, Daneman D. Eating disorders and IDDM: a problematic association. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 1402-1412[Abstract].
9. Fairburn CG, Peveler RC, Davies B, Mann JI, Mayou RA. Eating disorders in young adults with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a controlled study. BMJ 1991; 303: 17-20.
10. Peveler RC, Fairburn CG, Boller I, Dunger DB. Eating disorders in adolescents with IDDM: a controlled study. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 1356-1360[Abstract].
11. Striegel-Moore RH, Nicholson TJ, Tamborlane WV. Prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in preadolescent and adolescent girls with IDDM. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 1361-1368[Abstract].
12. Vila G, Nollet-Clemencon C, Vera L, Crosnier H, Robert JJ, Mouren-Simeoni MC. Etude des troubles des conduites alimentaires dans une population d'adolescentes souffrant de diabete insulino-dependent. Can J Psychiatry 1993; 38: 606-610[Medline].
13. Mannucci E, Ricca V, Mezzani B, Di Bernardo M, Piani F, Vannini R, et al. Eating attitudes and behavior in IDDM patients: a case controlled study. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 1503-1504[Medline].
14. Garner DM, Olmsted MP. Eating disorder inventory (EDI) manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1984.
15. Garner DM, Olmsted MP, Bohr Y, Garfinkel PE. The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psych Med 1982; 12: 871-878.
16. Johnson C. Initial consultation for patients with bulimia and anorexia nervosa. In: Garner DM, Garfinkel PE, eds. Handbook of psychotherapy for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. New York: Guilford, 1985:19-51.
17. Cooper Z, Fairburn CG. The eating disorder examination: a semi-structured interview for the assessment of the specific psychopathology of eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 1987; 6: 1-8.
18. Gillery P, Labbe D, Dumont G, Vassault A. Glycohemoglobin assays evaluated in a large-scale quality-control survey. Clin Chem 1995; 41: 1644-1648[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Hammer LD, Kraemer HC, Crisp AH. Standardized percentile curves of body-mass index for children and adolescents. Am J Dis Child 1991; 145: 259-263[Abstract].
20. Williams RL, Schafer CA, Shisslak CM, Gronwaldt MA, Comerci GD. Eating attitudes and behaviours in adolescent women: Discrimination of normals, dieters, and suspected bulimics using the eating attitudes test and the eating disorder inventory. Int J Eat Disord 1986; 5: 879-894.
21. Steel JM, Young RJ, Lloyd GG, MacIntyre CC. Abnormal eating attitudes in young insulin-dependent diabetics. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 155: 515-521[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Rodin G, Craven J, Littlefield C, Murray M, Daneman D. Eating disorders and intentional insulin undertreatment in adolescent females with diabetes. Psychosomatics 1991; 32: 171-176[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 1994.
24. Cooper Z, Cooper PJ, Fairburn CG. The validity of the eating disorder examination and its subscales. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 154: 807-812[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Wilson GT, Smith D. Assessment of bulimia nervosa: an evaluation of the eating disorder examination. Int J Eat Disord 1989; 8: 173-179.
26. Rosen JC, Vara L, Wendt S, Leitenberg H. Validity studies of the eating disorder examination. Int J Eat Disord 1990; 9: 519-528.
27. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977-986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28. Davis C. Body image, dieting behaviours, and personality factors: a study of high performance female athletes. Int J Sports Psychology 1992; 23: 179-192.
29. Garner DM, Garfinkel PE. Sociocultural factors in the development of anorexia nervosa. Psych Med 1980; 10: 647-656.
30. Abraham S. Characteristics of eating disorders among young ballet dancers. Psychopathology 1996; 29: 223-229[Medline].
31. Olmsted MP, Rodin GM, Rydall AC, Lawson ML, Daneman D. Effect of psychoeducation on disordered eating attitudes and behaviors in young women with IDDM. Diabetes 1997; 46 (suppl 1): 88A.

(Accepted 24 February 2000)

© BMJ 2000
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Young women with diabetes have raised risk of eating disorders
BMJ 2000 320: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Helgeson, V. S., Siminerio, L., Escobar, O., Becker, D. (2008). Predictors of Metabolic Control among Adolescents with Diabetes: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study. J Pediatr Psychol 0: jsn079v1-jsn079 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kichler, J. C., Foster, C., Opipari-Arrigan, L. (2008). The Relationship between Negative Communication and Body Image Dissatisfaction in Adolescent Females with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Health Psychol 13: 336-347 [Abstract]  
  • Goebel-Fabbri, A. E., Fikkan, J., Franko, D. L., Pearson, K., Anderson, B. J., Weinger, K. (2008). Insulin Restriction and Associated Morbidity and Mortality in Women with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 31: 415-419 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Puntis, J W L (2008). Specialist feeding clinics. Arch. Dis. Child. 93: 164-167 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Colton, P. A., Olmsted, M. P., Daneman, D., Rydall, A. C., Rodin, G. M. (2007). Five-Year Prevalence and Persistence of Disturbed Eating Behavior and Eating Disorders in Girls With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 30: 2861-2862 [Full text]  
  • Cameron, F. J., Northam, E. A., Ambler, G. R., Daneman, D. (2007). Routine Psychological Screening in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents: A notion whose time has come?. Diabetes Care 30: 2716-2724 [Full text]  
  • Helgeson, V. S., Snyder, P. R., Escobar, O., Siminerio, L., Becker, D. (2007). Comparison of Adolescents with and without Diabetes on Indices of Psychosocial Functioning for Three Years. J Pediatr Psychol 32: 794-806 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Pereira, R. F., Alvarenga, M. (2007). Disordered Eating: Identifying, Treating, Preventing, and Differentiating It From Eating Disorders. Diabetes Spectr. 20: 141-148 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Helgeson, V. S., Escobar, O., Siminerio, L., Becker, D. (2007). Unmitigated Communion and Health Among Adolescents With and Without Diabetes: The Mediating Role of Eating Disturbances. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33: 519-536 [Abstract]  
  • Morse, S. A., Ciechanowski, P. S., Katon, W. J., Hirsch, I. B. (2006). Isn't This Just Bedtime Snacking?: The potential adverse effects of night-eating symptoms on treatment adherence and outcomes in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 29: 1800-1804 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Battaglia, M. R., Alemzadeh, R., Katte, H., Hall, P. L., Perlmuter, L. C. (2006). Brief Report: Disordered Eating and Psychosocial Factors in Adolescent Females with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Pediatr Psychol 31: 552-556 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Grylli, V., Hafferl-Gattermayer, A., Wagner, G., Schober, E., Karwautz, A. (2005). Eating Disorders and Eating Problems Among Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Exploring Relationships With Temperament and Character. J Pediatr Psychol 30: 197-206 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Peveler, R. C., Bryden, K. S., Neil, H. A. W., Fairburn, C. G., Mayou, R. A., Dunger, D. B., Turner, H. M. (2005). The Relationship of Disordered Eating Habits and Attitudes to Clinical Outcomes in Young Adult Females With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 28: 84-88 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Silverstein, J., Klingensmith, G., Copeland, K., Plotnick, L., Kaufman, F., Laffel, L., Deeb, L., Grey, M., Anderson, B., Holzmeister, L. A., Clark, N. (2005). Care of Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 28: 186-212 [Full text]  
  • Colton, P., Olmsted, M., Daneman, D., Rydall, A., Rodin, G. (2004). Disturbed Eating Behavior and Eating Disorders in Preteen and Early Teenage Girls With Type 1 Diabetes: A case-controlled study. Diabetes Care 27: 1654-1659 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Maharaj, S., Daneman, D., Olmsted, M., Rodin, G. (2004). Metabolic Control in Adolescent Girls: Links to relationality and the female sense of self. Diabetes Care 27: 709-715 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Garcia-Reyna, N., Gussinyer, S., Gussinyer, M., Raich, R., Tomas, J., Carrascosa, A. (2003). Eating Disorders in 12- to 16-Year-Old Diabetic and Nondiabetic Adolescents From Barcelona, Spain. Diabetes Care 26: 2695-2695 [Full text]  
  • Berlin, K. S., Sass, D. A., Davies, W. H., Hains, A. A. (2002). Impact of Diabetes Disclosure on Perceptions of Eating and Self-Care Behaviors. The Diabetes Educator 28: 809-816 [Abstract]  
  • Neumark-Sztainer, D., Patterson, J., Mellin, A., Ackard, D. M., Utter, J., Story, M., Sockalosky, J. (2002). Weight Control Practices and Disordered Eating Behaviors Among Adolescent Females and Males With Type 1 Diabetes: Associations with sociodemographics, weight concerns, familial factors, and metabolic outcomes. Diabetes Care 25: 1289-1296 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Franzese, A., Valerio, G., Buono, P., Mozzillo, E., Gritti, A., Lucariello, M. A. (2002). Comorbidity of Type 1 Diabetes and Anorexia Nervosa in a 6-Year-Old Girl. Diabetes Care 25: 800-801 [Full text]  
  • Daneman, D., Rodin, G., Jones, J., Colton, P., Rydall, A., Maharaj, S., Olmsted, M. (2002). Eating Disorders in Adolescent Girls and Young Adult Women With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. 15: 83-105 [Full text]  
  • Nielsen, S., Emborg, C., Molbak, A.-G. (2002). Mortality in Concurrent Type 1 Diabetes and Anorexia Nervosa. Diabetes Care 25: 309-312 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Delamater, A. M., Jacobson, A. M., Anderson, B., Cox, D., Fisher, L., Lustman, P., Rubin, R., Wysocki, T. (2001). Psychosocial Therapies in Diabetes: Report of the Psychosocial Therapies Working Group. Diabetes Care 24: 1286-1292 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rodin, G. (2001). Review: behavioural interventions have a small to medium beneficial effect on diabetes management in adolescents with type 1 diabetesCommentary. Evid. Based Ment. Health 4: 46-46 [Full text]  
  • (2000). Eating Disorders Are More Common in Diabetic Adolescents. JWatch Psychiatry 2000: 11-11 [Full text]  
  • (2000). Eating Disorders: More Common in Young Women with Type 1 Diabetes. JWatch Women's Health 2000: 14-14 [Full text]  
  • (2000). Eating Disorders Are More Common in Diabetic Adolescents. JWatch General 2000: 4-4 [Full text]  

Student BMJ

Sepsis

The latest guidlines will affect how we practice medicine

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview