Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Giles J Peek a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northern
General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AN, b Department of Radiology, Northern General
Hospital
Correspondence to: G J Peek, Division of Cardiac Surgery,
University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP ycq57{at}dial.pipex.com
Diseases of the pleural space are common. In this review we
discuss the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and empyema.
We searched Medline (1966 to 1999), standard textbooks of thoracic
surgery, and life support manuals for articles that answered questions
that in our experience non-specialists commonly ask of specialists in
the diagnosis and management of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and empyema.
The pleura is a thin serous layer, which covers the lungs
(visceral pleura) and is reflected, by way of the lung hila, on to the
chest wall and pericardium (parietal pleura). The pleural space thus
created extends from the root of the neck, 3 cm above the mid-point of
the clavicle, down behind the abdominal cavity, in the
costodiaphragmatic recess, to the 12th rib overlying the kidney.1 Only a thin layer of pleural fluid separates the
parietal and visceral pleura. The parietal layer secretes 2400 ml
of fluid daily, which is resorbed by the visceral layer.2
Maintenance of negative intrapleural pressure is necessary for respiration.
Pneumothorax describes air within the pleural cavity. Pneumothorax
may be spontaneous, secondary to an underlying disease such as
emphysema or asthma, traumatic, or iatrogenic. "Spontaneous" pneumothoraces usually arise from rupture of small subpleural blebs.3 After the first spontaneous pneumothorax there is
a 10% chance of recurrence,4 and after a second
pneumothorax this increases to 40%.5
Clinical presentation
Management
Summary points
After a second spontaneous pneumothorax there is a 40% chance of
recurrence; video assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy and pleurodesis is
the treatment of choice
Needle decompression (second interspace, mid-clavicular line) is the
best treatment for suspected tension pneumothorax
Ultrasonography is helpful in cases of pleural effusion
A chest drain should be inserted in cases of exudative (protein content
greater than 3 g/l) pleural effusion that recur after aspiration, or in
parapneumonic effusions when the pH is less than 7.2 or the glucose
concentration is less than 3.33 mmol/l
A chest drain should be inserted for early empyema
Late presenting empyema should be treated by decortication if the
patient is fit, but patients who are unfit for major surgery should
receive thrombolytic instillation or thoracostomy
![]()
Methods
Top
Methods
The pleural space
Pneumothorax
Pleural effusion
Empyema
References
![]()
The pleural space
Top
Methods
The pleural space
Pneumothorax
Pleural effusion
Empyema
References
![]()
Pneumothorax
Top
Methods
The pleural space
Pneumothorax
Pleural effusion
Empyema
References
Patients with pneumothorax present with pleuritic pain or
breathlessness, or both, which can be life threatening especially if
the pneumothorax is under tension. On examination, expansion and breath
sounds are reduced and the percussion note is hyperresonant. Tracheal
shift away from the affected side indicates tension. Plain chest
radiography shows lung collapse and air in the pleural space. There may
be concomitant haemothorax caused by bleeding from adhesions between
visceral and parietal pleura, which tear when the lung
deflates.6
Tension pneumothorax should be immediately decompressed by needle
thoracocentesis through the second interspace in the mid-clavicular
line.7 It is dangerous to await confirmation by
radiography if tension is suspected.
Inserting chest drains
The insertion of chest drains has been discussed in many
texts,
7 9 10
but the importance of the insertion site
and the blunt dissection and non-trocar technique merit emphasis. Insertion should be within the "triangle of safety" through the fifth interspace (fig 1). This is level with the nipple in a man, and
the root of the breast in a woman. Insertion through lower spaces
carries the risk of entering the abdomen. Insertion with sharp
instruments carries a serious risk of injuring intrathoracic or
abdominal viscera.
|
Management of chest drains
If management of chest drains is optimal, 87%-91% of
spontaneous pneumothoraces can be managed without
surgery.
11 12
Upon insertion the drain should be
connected to a one-way valve system. An underwater seal is most
commonly used, but the Heimlich valve is useful outside the hospital or
during transport. An underwater seal will swing with respiration. It is
common practice to apply 2.5 to 5 kPa of suction to the outlet from the
underwater seal bottle. This is only essential if the lung does not
re-expand immediately or if there is an incompletely drained
haemopneumothorax. In the presence of a noticeable air leak it is
important to ensure that any suction apparatus can remove the volume of
air leaked. If not it will prevent resolution of the
pneumothorax and may place it under tension. Similarly, a drain
with an air leak should never be clamped. The underwater seal may not
swing when suction is used, but the difference between the height
of the water in the bottle and the tube indicates the negative
pressure being applied to the pleural cavity. Figure 2 shows the
subsequent management of a chest drain.
|
|
| |
Pleural effusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pleural effusion describes fluid (transudative or exudative) within the pleural space. Transudates (protein concentration less than 3.0 g/dl) are secondary to underlying disease, such as heart failure, or medical disorders leading to hypoalbuminaemia (for example, cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome, protein losing enteropathy). Usually there is evidence of the primary diagnosis. Exudates (protein concentration greater than 3.0 g/dl) are usually caused by infection (bacterial or mycobacterial), malignancy, collagen vascular disease, pancreatitis, or pulmonary embolism.19
Clinical presentation
Pleural effusions may be asymptomatic but if large produce
breathlessness or pain, or both. Breath sounds are reduced on the
affected side, and the percussion note is stony dull. Chest
x ray film shows blunting of the lateral costophrenic angle
if more than 200-500 ml of fluid is present. As the volume of fluid
increases, the hemidiaphragm becomes obscured. The upper margin of the
opacity tends to be concave
that is, higher laterally.
Investigation and management
Having established radiologically that fluid is present, a sample
must be obtained for biochemical, microbiological, and cytological
analysis. If the patient is free of symptoms, a sample can be obtained
with a 21 gauge needle and a 20 ml syringe. The patient is positioned
sitting up and leaning forwards over a bed table. Under conditions of
strict asepsis the effusion is tapped posteriorly in the
mid-scapular line one interspace below the upper limit of the dullness
to percussion but above the diaphragmatic reflection of the pleura.
including acid fast bacilli
and cell content (three
samples). If the fluid appears chylous, more specialised analysis is
required.21 About 80% of the time, cytology (three samples) identifies a malignant effusion22; false
positives are rare.23
Closed needle biopsy of the pleura is best performed early in the
investigation of a pleural exudate, at the time of drainage of the
effusion.24 This identifies 75% of cases of
tuberculosis.25 The technique is also useful if malignancy
is suspected,26 and, combined with cytology, 90% of cases
will be diagnosed.27 If mesothelioma is suspected video
assisted thoracoscopic surgery may be a more useful
technique.28
If the effusion is a transudate secondary to systemic disease such as
heart failure or nephrotic syndrome, it will not resolve until the
disease is treated. It may be necessary to tap the effusion periodically to relieve symptoms; prolonged chest drainage results in
significant protein and fluid losses.
Indications for insertion of chest drain
Patients with exudates not secondary to an underlying systemic
disease that recur after aspiration, or parapneumonic effusions with a
pH of less than 7.2 and a glucose concentration of less than 3.33 mmol/l, require an intercostal drain.29 The same technique
and site is used as for pneumothorax.
Management of drain
Low suction (2.5-5 kPa) may be useful in the management of these
drains, but unlike a pneumothorax it can be interrupted to allow
mobilisation. The drain should remain in place until less than 100 ml
of fluid is being drained per day. At this point the drain can be
removed if the underlying cause has been treated. There is no need to
clamp the drain. If, however, there is an underlying malignancy that
has not been treated (or is untreatable) then chemical pleurodesis with
talc, bleomycin,30 or tetracycline through the chest drain
may be beneficial. The drain is removed when the lung is expanded and
less than 100 ml of fluid is being drained per day. In some patients it
takes many weeks for the drainage to settle, in which case the patient
can be discharged home with the drain connected to a flutter bag. If
the lung fails to expand (this may occur with mesothelioma or malignant
effusions) a pleuroperitoneal shunt may be necessary.31
| |
Empyema |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Empyema describes pus within the pleural space. Causes of empyema may be parapneumonic, occur after trauma or surgery, or be associated with malignancy. Anaerobic bacteria, usually streptococci or Gram negative rods, are responsible for 76% of cases.32
Clinical presentation
Presentation varies from fulminant sepsis to dull pain and
shortness of breath. Empyema often occurs after an episode of
pneumonia. Initial investigation by plain chest radiography may show
features suggestive of pleural fluid and underlying consolidation (fig
4). Radiography may also show an abscess cavity with fluid, which can
be confused with an intrapulmonary abscess. Computed tomography is
usually required to differentiate the two. Ultrasonography is helpful
in most cases of suspected empyema. It can confirm the presence of
pleural fluid and determine if the fluid is suitable for needle
aspiration or, if there is debris within the fluid, formal
drainage.
|
Management
Patients who present early, before the pus is loculated and a
fibrinous peel has formed on the lung, are treated by simple drainage.
Decortication is usually curative if the empyema is advanced beyond
this or if simple drainage fails. The fibrinous peel is removed from
the lung, allowing it to expand and obliterate the abscess cavity. This
is a major operation requiring single lung anaesthesia, and many
patients with cardiac or underlying lung disease will not tolerate it.
In many centres video assisted thoracoscopic surgery is used routinely
to accomplish decortication.33
Conclusion
Most patients with pneumothorax and pleural effusion can be
managed by non-specialists using simple techniques. Needle
thoracocentesis is the treatment of choice for tension pneumothorax.
All doctors should be aware of this as tension pneumothorax can present
anywhere
in the street, in patients' homes, or even at 36 000
feet.36
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank David Mitton for help with the illustrations.
Contributors: GJP had the idea for the review and wrote the paper. SM provided figure 4 and wrote the radiological sections of the paper. GC revised the paper and supervised GJP. GC will act as guarantor for the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Anon. Last's anatomy. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1990. |
| 2. | Wang N-S. Anatomy and physiology of the pleural space. Clin Chest Med 1985; 6: 3-16[Medline]. |
| 3. | Becker HP, Weidringer JW, Willy C, Hartel W, Blumel G. Light and scanning electron microscopy studies of the pleura. A contribution to the pathogenesis of spontaneous pneumothorax in young patients. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1991; 376: 295-301[Medline]. [In German.] |
| 4. | Athanassiadi K, Kalavrouziotis G, Loutsidis A, Hatzimichalis A, Bellenis I, Exarchos N. Surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: ten-year experience. World J Surg 1998; 22: 803-806[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Hart GJ, Stokes TC, Couch AH. Spontaneous pneumothorax in Norfolk. Br J Dis Chest 1983; 77: 164-170[Medline]. |
| 6. |
Alfageme I, Moreno L, Huertas C, Vargas A, Hernandez J, Beiztegui A.
Spontaneous pneumothorax. Long-term results with tetracycline pleurodesis.
Chest
1994;
106:
347-350 |
| 7. | Anon. Advanced trauma life support course for physicians. Chicago: American College of Surgeons, 1993. |
| 8. | Miller AC, Harvey JE. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Standards of Care Committee, British Thoracic Society [correction appears in BMJ 1993;307:308]. BMJ 1993; 307: 114-116. |
| 9. | Peek GJ, Firmin RK, Arsiwala S. Chest tube insertion in the ventilated patient. Injury 1995; 26: 425-426[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Hyde J, Sykes T, Graham T.
Reducing morbidity from chest drains.
BMJ
1997;
314:
914 |
| 11. |
Chee CB, Abisheganaden J, Yeo JK, Lee P, Huan PY, Poh SC, et al.
Persistent air-leak in spontaneous pneumothorax clinical course and outcome.
Resp Med
1998;
92:
757-761[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12. | Jain SK, Al-Kattan KM, Hamdy MG. Spontaneous pneumothorax: determinants of surgical intervention. J Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 39: 107-111[Medline]. |
| 13. | Rodriguez-Panadero F, Antony VB. Pleurodesis: state of the art. Eur Resp J 1997; 10: 1648-1654[Abstract]. |
| 14. | Cagirici U, Sahin B, Cakan A, Kayabas H, Buduneli T. Autologous blood patch pleurodesis in spontaneous pneumothorax with persistent air leak. Scand Cardiovasc J 1998; 32: 75-78[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Passlick B, Born C, Haussinger K, Thetter O.
Efficiency of video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax.
Ann Thorac Surg
1998;
65:
324-327 |
| 16. | Waller DA, Yoruk Y, Morritt GN, Forty J, Dark JH. Videothoracoscopy in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: an initial experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993; 75: 237-240[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Waller DA.
Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax a 7 year learning experience.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
1999;
81:
387-392[Medline].
|
| 18. | Graham AN, Cosgrove AP, Gibbons JR, McGuigan JA. Randomised clinical trial of chest drainage systems. Thorax 1992; 47: 461-462[Abstract]. |
| 19. |
Jay SJ.
Pleural effusions, 1: preliminary evaluation recognition of the transudate.
Postgrad Med
1986;
80:
164-167.
|
| 20. | McLoud TC, Flower CD. Imaging the pleura: sonography, CT, and MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 6: 1145-1153. |
| 21. | Jay SJ. Pleural effusions, 2: definitive evaluation of the exudate. Postgrad Med 1986; 80: 181-188. |
| 22. | Light RW, Erozan YS, Ball Jr WC. Cells in pleural fluid. Their value in differential diagnosis. Arch Intern Med 1973; 132: 854-860[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Dekker A, Bupp PA. Cytology of serous effusions. An investigation into the usefulness of cell blocks versus smears. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 70: 855-860[Medline]. |
| 24. |
Kirsch CM, Kroe DM, Jensen WA, Kagawa FT, Wehner JH, Campagna AC.
A modified Abrams needle biopsy technique.
Chest
1995;
108:
982-986 |
| 25. |
Salyer WR, Eggleston JC, Erozan YS.
Efficacy of pleural needle biopsy and pleural fluid cytopathology in the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm involving the pleura.
Chest
1975;
67:
536-539 |
| 26. |
McLean AN, Bicknell SR, McAlpine LG, Peacock AJ.
Investigation of pleural effusion: an evaluation of the new Olympus LTF semiflexible thoracofiberscope and comparison with Abram's needle biopsy.
Chest
1998;
114:
150-153 |
| 27. | Larsen K, Axelsen F. Closed pleural biopsy and fluid cytology in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary cancer with pleural involvement. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 16: 197-199[Medline]. |
| 28. | Boutin C, Rey F. Thoracoscopy in pleural malignant mesothelioma: a prospective study of 188 consecutive patients. Part 1: diagnosis. Cancer 1993; 72: 389-393[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. | Light RW, Rodriguez RM. Management of parapneumonic effusions. Clin Chest Med 1998; 19: 373-382[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. | Noppen M, Degreve J, Mignolet M, Vincken W. A prospective, randomised study comparing the efficacy of talc slurry and bleomycin in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions. Acta Clinica Belgica 1997; 52: 258-262[Medline]. |
| 31. | Petrou M, Kaplan D, Goldstraw P. Management of recurrent malignant pleural effusions. The complementary role of talc pleurodesis and pleuroperitoneal shunting. Cancer 1995; 75: 801-805[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | Varkey B. Pleural effusions caused by infection. Postgrad Med 1921; 80: 213-216. |
| 33. |
Cassina PC, Hauser M, Hillejan L, Greschuchna D, Stamatis G.
Video-assisted thoracoscopy in the treatment of pleural empyema: stage-based management and outcome.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1999;
117:
234-238 |
| 34. |
Chin NK, Lim TK.
Controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase in the treatment of pleural empyema and complicated parapneumonic effusions.
Chest
1997;
111:
275-279 |
| 35. | Anon. Glenn's thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1991. |
| 36. |
Wallace WA.
Managing in flight emergencies: a personal account.
BMJ
1995;
311:
374-375 |
Read all Rapid Responses